Sunday, September 30, 2012
Lost Earth and Vector Landscapes
L. Edgar Otto September 30, 2012
From the foundational view much of the mathematical in mathematical physics can can be understood beneath the identities involved in applying matrices and linear algebra which has in the working theoretical world extensive shared terminology.
As for a picture of how this works, at least in the low dimensions, the grasp of it with the slightest hint of the mechanics and possibility of interpreting the mechanism is an achievement that brings us close to ourselves and that identity and what of the subjective and objective grounds the world.
Lost Earth is a game I imagined which as a knot or maze in a wooden box that the path cannot be seen from the outside. A small blue marble can enter it from two sides and the idea is to turn the cube in its positions to get the marble out of the other side thru the right angle turns of which the chances in general are determined for solving by the geometry (or stereonomety) alone. In a more sophisticated path we can of course have a laybrinth wherein entry and exit points can have different difficulties to negotiate and begin solutions from one opening to the other.
Research on very small mazes is being developed so that these principles allow the slow release of medicines over a wider period of time. I can image the mazes within mazes for a more accurate relationship of levels of action, release of chemicals physically, much like the range of Japanese ink in beads of glass with beads of glass within them.
So a simple mechanical device can achieve the realization of what on the face of it seems a complex case of organic structure and uncertainty in the quantum considerations. But I suggest, at the foundational assessment of the matrices the same general stereonometry applies subjectively to arranging say 15 objects placed in a triangle to see how these are related symbolically as to the interpretation or solution to the puzzle of arrangement as if there is a unique one or of all solutions the totality may have a clear pattern.
It is not enough to merely relate the identities of the twists and turns of coordinates in a matrix by the general statement of trigonometry identities to grasp the view of foundations. For as with our present mathematics in the unity, in one, we have the singularities arise between infinity and nothingness of which we tend to work outside the limits for what we explain. These principles certainly apply to our unique ambiance or bonds of belief and the general mechanisms of learning real or ideal objects such as numbers not committed necessarily to their independent reality.
Experience as experiment may not be enough for we determine what is a given pattern or matrix in a particular arbitrary case of a structure. In the Lost Earth it is cleat that if we pay attention to the sound as we turn things, that is probe the cube with a sense of touch, this would be a clue in a maze to the sequence of directions needed to solve the maze. Of course we can X-ray the box or any such applying physical objects to see by frequencies passing through it what is the state of the blue marble. Of course we can also saw through the box, open it to access the state of things if that does not change or destroy the pattern by doing it. In this sense the direction and idea of gravity has a stereonomic effect by which it seems independent of all other forces quite beside the issue of what in such forces are continuous or discrete.
In this sense a base of numbers, such as that of ten digits, works well on any tenth power of some value such that with a general relationship we can summarize in small tables any tenth power say of how to assign the radio spectrum waves.
Thus the arithmetic has a general, floating coherent basis or pattern. This ability of nine or ten things justifies not only the duplication of counted structures reasoned by the idea of shadows of structures as complex spaces but of the tenfold applications derived ultimately from four space and golden lengths in it when focused to some central coordinate.
Nothing forbids the table of numbers times numbers nor that we may not distinguish in a topological pattern a point of vast divide between one and two sided surfaces. But it is not quite enough for our understanding of how symmetry and dimension, how patterns are available to form and how the action works. Nor enough that we try to contain such vast changes in pattern by algebra alone or by just finite numbers. After the identity of algebra and geometry comes a more foundational relation that grounds them beyond the idea of the frontiers of new mathematics especially if we just apply the idea of logarithms and natural bases that ultimately define this identity of our two evolved procedures.
Without making a statement on eschatology as the interpretation of the number 153 as the maximum number of fish held in a net (from the New Testament) I ask what sort of frame or net can catch the maximum number of prime fish. We can say for example in the Bible, most likely formalized by the Greeks, there is a lot of number theory for 153 if the digits are cubes sum to 153. What then does the literally taking of the permutation of those digits mean as a number pattern say multiplied by 100 - or are they just a trivial property of numbers moved around as if a pointless exercise of computation in search of a wider theory? But can we not ask the same thing of the sentience or subjectivity of our system of symbols as to the grounding of what is certain in a pattern as meaning?
For the golden ratio times ten squared minus 153 is nine, and in the illustration we find the pattern foundational principlles multiples of 81 or twice that. The one or two thirds of things as if on a parallel diagonal of a matrix of decreasing elements less than 17 times 81 of four space as if again in this top matrix of beastly primes these act as prime though composite - in particular their products are combinations of 153 and the relation of such combinations tend to be compliments or co-compliments in the directionality of the realization of the assumed action from the state or stereonometry of these prime class like numbers.
The of course add up to the 'Beast' or 666 in the lore - and while 777 or 888 is the metaphor for the Christ we find here the significant 999 as the beginning, without zero, of what happens starting with 9 dimensional space.
Intuitively it is clear that of what we are seeing here is the digits as not just power cubed but rather as a relation of geometrical cubes in space. As three space moreover the permutations certainly mean that we may find significance in the idea of 3+1 or 2+1 (that is 2x2 from one view or even 6x6) in the presumed equal grounding of the quantum realm.
* * * * * *
Friday, September 28, 2012
Vectons (or Vectorions)
L. Edgar Otto 28 September, 2012
There are extended patterns up to a level of mechanical dimensions determined by primes that are unified by the accumulation of past facts that make a quasifinite chain of what beyond that level may be endlessly random insofar as what is the unique choices imagined as discovery somewhere along the sequence which in general may be said to encode or thought to encode all informational possibilities, the vecton structurally in the space beyond these lower dimensions and finite sets of primes as well the vecton (or vectorion) of the pattern itself. This formalizes the fixed and freedom of the dynamic omnium itself.
In particular the question of what happens at nine dimensions and beyond, or where nine previous digits in hexadecimal may show the next nine in the decimal part of pi is a projective plane and quasic brane question where the pattern of quasicity begins combining these vectors deeper and doubled than simple orthogons. This in primitive terms is the quasic grounding for the distinction of the view of three plus one things in concert with two times two things in the formalism. Thus the digits as dimensions may have a pattern where these as dimensional directions may shift in an internal pattern or may be a general matter of probabilities that has fixed a past pattern or directed the range of a future pattern to narrowing or expanding possibilities.
Within these first few digits and the general differences that are adding one, or of counting from zero we find the pattern of primes and natural numbers, binary bases, the corresponding nature of phi (tau or the golden ratio) and other simple relations such as those parts of a squaring of a matrix to contain elements of sixteen spaces with six or seven (that is subtract one) empty but complimentary. Can such a pattern really be expanded beyond nine space physically? The we imagine a possibility but from our condensed limited view of which the question is can reality ultimately be limited like that herself?
But within this limitation and the shifts in dimension of the intelligible multiplicity of axes as phi-tau distinguished in differentiation of a set of independent vectons seemingly at a natural distance we of course have further division possibilities in the binary powers in the projective quasic planes in planes where the representation of Riemann plane equivalence to a sphere is a smooth transition in some imagined evolving multiply quasic brane space.
* * * * * * *
footnote: this is a rather difficult posting for those readers interested in this blog for the art or philosophy's sake. It did not come come from a dream, perhaps from the leaking minds in dream-space in the collective consciousness (so to speak) of the closest bloggers I follow here- anyway it was another day of total emptiness as if this really was a stretch to unify ideas. It amounts, I think, to at least an exotic brane theory (see Lubos today ) and clears up that difficult posting by those with no inkling of what these higher ideas are. I see that Pitkanen discusses similar foundational issues from his TGD viewpoint and concerns.
In any case, from the higher view, one that still holds open the question of uniqueness determined by low prime dimensions or not in a context (lower than the current concerns of structures in these more advanced new physics speculations, by that I mean more foundational) as if to make such models they can only be tested in real time as with the weather and building cathedrals... exotic of course in we understand in the higher spaces the recursive and not necessarily proven patterns apply to our universe as this is a vecton point of view as philosophy also, that the question of the reality of alternate histories or deterministic ones imposed is still an open question.
Our spirit in this sense, or a culture that begins anew as with the once great expanse of New France, as with the people of the Great Lakes are visitors- and yet for those still there who go into the woods to fast, to meditate, the hard life is of course in their hints and dreams a good life where in a gathering by some chance shore several generations before and after them seem to hold council in deep prophesy or in just the collecting of berries. (obviously PBS shows, especially from the Wisconsin channel I find inspiring lately)
But it seems at the moment to me to state that there is a directionality of sorts wherein while wider spans of alternative universes and realities are possible as these build upon their past histories the foundational vectons as places of singularity point-like entities (as if there are no more than the first few prime numbers that are fixed in this scheme)- this akin to what is magnetism such that while it and electric fields correspond at the ground level the former is derived from the other one sided and beyond the flatland of Euclid when such unity or zero if found their existence itself as part of the electromagnetic (thus shadow quasifinite primes) is relative.
* * * * * * * *
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Metric of the Romantic Bond
L. Edgar Otto 27 September, 2012
We imagine in our intuitions that we have shadow selves, perhaps a special other, a match of souls under unique stars which love projected contains the universe, timeless beyond
Everlasting & justification the bond consumes the interfering petty dreams of others never reached the heights, lesser existences.
We think in the main we are programmed to love our children and that is true to a degree for love born of clocks and motion. Yet we know there is more than that code of love's dream if programmed or of broken bonds love self repairs.
A mother reports a special bond with the child she carries who shares the blood and the blood brain barrier while we see it as a romantic thing, a nice dream to believe, no ground in the arts and science beyond the facts of living in the flesh, memories ill or good stored and shared over time
Reports now in the popular press of our times powerful awakening of secrets, of our selves and of the starry sky
The child's cells as surely as that secret language not forgotten between twins of the same womb as if they are almost connected in reading each others pain and minds
The cells that stay in the body from the child after it born
acting to help the mother fight the even rouges that may arise as if these in stealth betray her, undermine immunity
provoke mutiny as if a mortal revolution, or failed immortal rebellion. So too in her dreams her other souls vie to rule.
Inside her too, perhaps in the neutral passing through the code of her offspring left in her brain- amazed and suspected this the cause on a higher space of fading memory, brittle bones- all the higher genome that cannot light up the spiral chains nor act upon what such higher bonds can read. But who knows at some distance close by the link is there that tunnels through such higher space, sharing fate and sentience? How far back the chain of ghosts, ancestors?
Love has bonds still higher yet it metric in the magic we still do not understand or believe, never in the flesh to touch to share the waters or exude the sour bitter lipstick aftertaste in the testing of the salts, in the seduction into stealth of disease.
Dark is the magic of such potions that reach to you and read of you in the distance, pass through you without touching, jump the bones and jumping genes the world and soul barrier by which our heart decays or recycles in the building
at least in dreams where we in the higher place walk hand in hand and can hardly tell what by the shores is you or me or love or light or salt and see in the spiral born or broken shells and the sand.
There we have known the truth of things and held dialog past the beginnings and ends of dance and time no matter what the animal in struggle tells itself in struggle, in the sunlight, or with eyes and neck held high daydreams while the old tired gray mare cheated of her golden wings or cone of a unicorn just looks upward rather than tired and down, love once the consumed melting comet ice star grazer as if to have a cloak to make the superstitious think there is passion and wisdom the constellations of a thousand suns, she the stargazer.
We are more than stardust, you who only know whom I really loved...
* * * * *
Particle Physics and Transparent Invisibility
L. Edgar Otto 27 September, 2012
In a condenser quasifinite model the internal and hidden symmetries are more than the coming together and breaking apart of physical properties in diagrams of loops and node or even loops of loops and nodes of nodes.
Our face value flatland description, while true in the conversion of bases and bits of information that in a general theory will prove a possibility after all, is not that simple anymore than how we describe what is the antiparticle such as a neutron to its mirrors in terms of symmetries and parts. Thus the idea of invisibility and cloaking, of transparency and other familiar phenomena of light merge into the hint of a more general physics and philosophical stance to material and other influences in the darkness.
In particular the technical achievement of making an object invisible to some wavelength- or even to the possible series of constants of action in a hierarchy seems to ask from the viewpoint of that invisible the cloak around it would see but the face or mirror of itself as with any such quasic condenser system topology (although for these to be a reality on different levels we may find subtle connection or leakages as if something can be discerned through the translucent light- in which case the division of color into primaries is the idea in physicality that we in effect see nine rather than three dimensions either three at a time or at the joint merger).
These ideas if grasped seem to suggest that researchers and theoreticians throughout the world have and aura or cloak of depth to which they have a deeper understanding and the general population assumes of itself that it cannot understand the level of such wisdom or those who are in the transparent simplicity of unified and solved knowledge think the popular world are not able to understand at the moment.
But certainly the general masses should not assume that those maintaining the research know everything or cannot be wrong in what they are doing and saying. So which in the average case as to what moves the worlds awakening to wisdom adheres to honesty, objectivity and transparency in the ideals and goals of science?
After all, at different velocities we can imagine, if we read Einstein and Leibniz at the same time- that if we flew fast enough like the man of steel we can pass through walls and not touch that within it or of what it may be made, not break through the spherical rim of a four dimensional volcano at some speed so as to fall into the paradoxes and closure of horizons below potential wells.
In keeping with the theme of turtle vision asking of what benefit it is to these creatures to see at least four dimensions if these aware of a more general structure of the environment or just in a relation to it hidden or not so able to navigate mysteriously as most of the birds and other creatures that are one with the earth we might ask if within their shell as far as dimension beyond three or four these would be invisible to themselves or in self reflection as if a pale copy of awareness, a history of survival by behavior as well as physical structure within themselves but not lost within themselves as sentient things have this possibility as degrees of freedom in the ocean to which in this simple models we try to force the physics of molecules blind to the higher symmetries and dimensions by sight if not touch of the dark matter and energy as a concept of wider space.
* * * * * * *