New Principle of Super-Recursion fractal of the prime 13 distinguishing bosons and fermions on the main and quasic diagonals up to 8 natural dimensions.
***
I am not a fan of artificial chess programs. It is fun when it happens to make the program seem to become desperate and lose going haywire. Today, I found a powerful new physics concept which I never would have found had I not tried to analyze the game for an edge for our chess club. I found logically extended nD chess.
*
AK this is how it goes with parallel models, hauntingly close similarities. So we discover the fourth dimension and Kant enters again by similarity to computers through the back door that required Einstein to generalize further. Or we throw in thermodynamics at the modern physics frontier as if we are unaware our metabolism is measured as a fourth power compared to volume. 10 classical dimensions to the fourth power warp ten faster than light as an absolute value? What of five powers, that is what dodecahedra and four space is all about as we seem to feel comfortable at some level of residual continuity ignoring descending dimensional symmetry. Horgan's quantum tetrahedra reaching deeper as scientific should come to mind here too.
*
A flat honeycomb of one infinite plane (brane) is not a complete (Euclidean or curved) description that fills or divides into crystalline unit elements all of general space. A local point and its connections removed (edges) to other points does leave a finite polyhedron from a flat infinite polyhedron. You are asking why 136 (triangles) rather than 144. Think about this. It is rather abstract and we can have too many triangles left over as hidden ones by half again. I cannot say I understand the debate here other than any theoretician worth his salt makes progress after core models crumble. On the other hand I know of no one on earth who has yet answered Dirac's (or Eddington's) deep question, why 136?\
Think about this. It is rather abstract and we can have too many triangles left over as hidden ones by half again. I cannot say I understand the debate here other than any theoretician worth his salt makes progress after core models crumble.
*
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/
*
The natural dimensions can be thought of as recursive lattices. 5n for 2D, 7n for 3D, 9n for 4D, 11n for 5D...in the dynamic animation where the natural and hidden dimension foundation difference is calculating by arithmetic at null points of a precession space wherein Fabonacci ratios apply as the product of such dimensional differences in a finite group theory and implied superpositing up to the quasic dimension where the visualization by algorithm super reflections is a natural coherent Kover simulation. (See lesson 2 in progress) but this hypothesis to test may have other restraints to our percieved generalities as analog continuous groups. It may be we have reached the limits of experimental theory then theory itself as so limited as well. - or not, as Sabine says of publication "just do it" in all its profound conceptual simplicity (which Lubos does not get in his long artical lashing out incoherently even for string theory in that bizarre interval where we should not publish anything after 1929 quantum relativity up to the last 40 years at the beginning of string theory if we accept what pseudoscience and what is not.
In reply to our fine new thinkers and Lubos not worth reading anymore.
*
*
Dear Jes,
Of course there is a conductor for this symphony of the universe. Director for the dawn chorus on he moors and other wild places left across the world where the songbirds greet the morning sun . Or come the evening this winged cloud with finer eyes and ears than we have yet known, sing as loud again at the evening twilight. The in the silence of the day there are surprises, great events, an eclipse that disturbs the cycles of their continuum and they make such a fuss of their territory and warnings. But in the silence thru the night as much a part of the song that we see it in relief, those like you and I, mockingbirds, the peer review of all songs and with a song ourselves, sing all through the night.
May you hear them as much as dream you have dreamed of hearing them one day,
Young Nietzsche looking for his contact lenses or bifocal Franklin glasses on his hands and knees searching randomly in the grass below the lamplight.
*
The contradiction in the article is the statement on law that the declaration of independence is the law of the land. Do they understand what they write in a general or even assumed historical context? The most narrow minded position is when militant materialist science and militant religious fanatics is imposed as progress and said not an impediment to civil transcending beyond morality and freedom of inquiry to pursue security as sustainable wealth beyond equal opportunity in what amounts to a starcrossed but meaningless Marriage. Krauss does a service in popular communication promoting science even among those who disagree in their tragic first and true love in the balance. That two not even wrongs may make a right is more an issue of honesty in both camps of this debate. As such it addresses within our concerns of the people and those of expertise with the responsibility of leadership as a frontier scientific question. Krauss says 'should ' and not 'must ' as the article's title baits us, evidently in a world of no necessary realities where we strive to find sane exceptions. In reply to Don Lincoln on NY Times article.
*
Jaya Redefine 'curl', shift colors in sequence including hidden ones in simply connected irrotational centers, add other general and local escape angles that set measure for entropy as information, and take a more skeptical view of the limited fundamental theorem of calculus applied with quasifinite super-reflections.
*
I just read but cannot find to reply to an article titled: Will quantum decoherence be the downfall of American democracy? This analogy cannot hold for any state. The partitioning of a state is more predictable than QM formalism. Given 34 states they will split or become one higher union. What is the determinism that dispassionately drives a people to civil war? Empires rise and empires fall periodically. Unity could be achieved by a confederation if it seeks to expand its frontiers. The declaration of independence was not the law of the land but imposed from a leader who had the advantage of rapid communication yet even that has limitations for how many messages can be sent and received at the same time. The only perfect 'democracy' is when in industrial trench warfare there is no one left to play the game. We know also that in the case of religious sects the diversity of their dividing actually promotes the general trend of that religion's hegemony. Electrification although a quantum leap has failed to solve this modern mysticism as well.
*
I can imagine that could be done and many have tried to do it. (a string assumed physical could be defined by an angle up to minimum quantization not just its spin - if I now ask myself what you are asking me. The angle from an imagined particle center.) But we can see this as a measure of quality as well, more of a loop theory approach. But can we measure either on the level we are one with a measure? There is a third way as the difference in these invisible thereby views time or cause animated or not, teleology. I call 'quasicity', but there are more 3&4D such angles involved.) All these stances are in development with new assumptions and principles as well as rather complex systems that depend on denial of some assumptions or principles that hides development. That the universe at default like a quantum cat exists or not yet persists is not necessarily a question of quantity or quality such as the role of conscious in logic design systems models.
*
Does God create nothing? Beyond timeless space and spaceless time He is the final frontier. But only half of either universe can be measurable or rationally infinitely indivisible. The universe (or the abstract God) exists and not exists thus persist at some horizon where the center (singularity) and circumference (time and space) are both everywhere and nowhere.
*
Marni deserves a lot more than this. She is one of the greats of our age. We have not understood the full cost of our marginalizing such physicists... the issues is priceless.
*
If prejudice is the child of ignorance can conviction be the child of wisdom?You said "I don't know". That point mentioned in Sabine's paper
There is a much deeper issue here thinking about this that influences my thinking because of the lucid advice of which this essay is the perfect example. It is the Wagner in the background of some Hawking slowly evaporating desiring to run yet deep into the contemplation of problems of our existing, lost useful thought to which we now regret what was a time for effort. In this post-alphanumeric age whom is to blame? Academia? Those who set themselves up as judges of another's work? Perhaps the drive on the surface to turn last century's light into renewable but ever expensive text books for the sake of industry? Some of us, if not all of us are outside the bell curve like said by Jung of a few prophets. Or the whole process that extracts tribute by a token salute to a long list of names implied in a conspiracy research, Fermi escaped, and Einstein slipped through. In refuge some are wounded looking back at the evil miasma tied quite irrationally to some patch of soil its existence in world consensus so are driven to imagine some evil that would diminish their perfect pearls, shells or walls in walls that they focus the light within the light to achieve some ultimate fusion that save for such a fear science as we know it would not now exist. Maybe what Nietzsche said in Zarathustra, in his down-going, eternal return, trial by fire of etheral spirits against the indignity of the empty sky and its murder of carrion crows - we petition the prophet who responds one should not ask him lest he takes from them what little they already know. I do not exist myself as beyond a few friends it made a difference for that I am not part of a university. It does not matter because I as human have seen something of an original truth - but I regret the volumes of work so vanished or the time spent that such a wound in festering will undermine the positive awakening of our shared and private lives. If we were worthy and could confirm it then the ideal should be free to do inquiry or at least our scientists exempt from war. How little of great work may not have gotten through. Let us find a new way to teach, to acknowledge our youthful and ancient contributions of what may be the best of illustrations of those lost in the margins. But friend, I am not telling you something your own sensitivity to the human condition is not aware of on some level, of what you already know of that, don't you?
****
|
No comments:
Post a Comment