A Calculus of Singularity

A Calculus of Singularity
(A philosophy of cosmology as general stereonometry in scientific phenomenology)
This page will be revised over the next few days for explict descriptions of the principles)

L. Edgar Otto Principle (for say a Calculus of Singularity) Anomalies may arise just at that point where an isolated interval may distinguish itself from a totality of infinite or indefinite extent as if such a poking the balloon. In a general sense a selection or evolving model of galaxies or such analogies as universes is not necessarily the total picture where we cannot find a more general model with initial origins or endings. We may of course only be part of a small focused general anomaly at such a pin prick and that is our limitation choice. Note the standard view on the unique reading of the gene code has been changed by experiment to a wider view where such initiators and terminators are part of a wider space where nature in analogy to DNA is a wider theory. So our evolutionary models are rather simplistic also.   ‎5/‎25/‎2014

The Philosophic Interpretation of Gravitational Wave Evidence of the Cosmic Background Data

L. Edgar Otto                                       05/22/2014

*1 An indirect intention meets an indirect observation, indicators and the reading of data.

*2 At the "present" if a beginning would superentanglement superdetermine the state of becoming in the here and now?

*3 Would this suggest a more spacious range of what is meant by our ideas of evidence?

*4 Otherwise, as if physically described by Heisenberg matrices in the scope of that of them but philosophic interpretation, in pulsar systems be indirect evidence?

*5 Or direct evidence of evidently hidden energy (by our indirect mathematical methods apparently) of the changes in proximity of two stellar objects conserving fixed scale changes as apparent motion of all parameters and ultimately nothing further.

*6 So in a particular system as a physical pattern such hidden parameters (such as the 15 in 3D to 4D or 28 in 4D to 5D and so on) explicitly determined as "s, super" or "b, boring evidence from some shifting solution, casual or causal, or the method as well as instruments by the search for such evidence that which guarantees observation of the evidence?

*7 Extraordinary claims do not necessarily need such superordinary evidence.

* * *      * * * *

On the Cosmic Heartbeat

Blog is active again after a long winter

L. Edgar Otto (The PeSla)  21 May, 2014

Social Gravity, Scientific Phenomenology, and the Cosmic Heartbeat
                                         L. Edgar Otto  04.11.14

How would we design a universe with all the possibilities most general? The question is not one of the universe here rather than not here. It is not that we can say from the nothingness it arises spontaneously. But what else can we imagine it to be if in the singular state at the deepest level nature in being itself so is a reference frame indifferent to our question on existence by which we build our philosophy and models?

Time Machines and Echo Wobbles

L. Edgar Otto    December 07, 2013

Alone on the front porch Olney unfolded his time machine.  It was made of cardboard with numbered dials and pictures of rocket ships and the solar system.  This was the year zero which he could not find on the dial of years and he tried for awhile to figure out just how old he was, or was he a year older he thought to himself.  Nevertheless, be began to think about his future life and how long until Haley's comet would return again.

In our dream land such machines obey the truth of their own inner laws much as in the world of the awake where we still wonder if such machines can be real.  In this space of dreams Olney found he could go back close to but not before the year zero of his unfolding.

Time seems still a little fuzzy from his flight back to childhood, to decades past from the present day. We try to fill the gaps between the finite mortal paths as we mold the clay of memories.  He could not say back then that he could see into some future, but he could see rare dreams of who would be born or died, what the constellation of his family would be, even as if at a birthday party being the first born from a glimpsed distant past before some zero point he said goodbye to his siblings with sorrow although he knew he would see them again.

Even rarer the few times he knew the old shawled lady had moved on and between his dream and awaken falling in a sea or scroll of silver stars on blue she called to him.  But childhood can contain fearful dreams where children know enough that the cartoon coyote will fall even if he does not know he ran past the clif. Or when in playing cowboys or soldiers those who fall are only is pretend in play.  So Olney woke up a little frightened of his dream.

In this era, in the small universe of the old house on Derby road, how close were theses events?  The microscope he when saw the transparent beating of hearts of snails in the jelly egg cases on the side of a jar of pond water and rotting leaves and a snow of barely visible cyclops.  Or when the first Echo satellites were launched from Langley and they wobbled in the sunlight. Or sputnik on the hour on the larger than he stood shortwave radio.  Earlier he did understand why no one was excited when he thought he discovered the morning star, something so bright and out of place.  He combined rubbing alcohol with water and like magic thought he found a new element Olnium. Or in the fuzzy time with magnets, matches, plastic and iron filings he made sparklers and aluminum foil rockets. Or glued swizzle sticks together to discover the ten triangle deltahedron.

In any case that infinity that forbids division by zero into the first blush unity of it all Olney saw as a dynamic division as if the unfolding of dimensions evolving ever higher from the first zero point. Through these doors he peeked thru a keyhole into world of vibrant radiating colors to the cold geometry of his pencil scribbles to an adult's eyes. He tried to open locks in combinations of the numbers as well back when watching the numbers change on the gasoline pumps the dynamic division by which he could add columns of five digit telephone numbers in his head the adults took hours to decide if Oln had done it right. The world to Olney seemed much more magic than just the Old lady's skeleton keys, such skeletons were full of motion and of meat like when he could see the higher colors in the craters and caves in the mountains of the moon.  Alas, all the apple and oranges games in grade school stopped such addition that took years to see numbers this way of a deeper way to add things too. That and by the simple trick of adding zeros like on the abbacus place holders the teacher and students were amazed with such large numbers.

There are a lot of normal dreams lately as if in the going back we trace such many armed levels of a few finite life paths, a resolution or understanding of some lesser things and a little bit of new sensitivity to how others felt toward their lives in retrospect as many as the raindrops. Only one dream was the key to this testament today, for Olney kept many turtles and pets and on his explorations thru the little ditch and mudflats around the teeming life in the brackish tide waters. Old Red Eyes in the shed half hibernating thru the winter, growing hollow eyed and all the turtles put back or escaping with the spring rains. Olney had freed them or allowed them to leave yet visited them again that together they find the passion of the first of springs.

* * * * *
Now, can any of you geniuses out there design an app for me so I can test the fish?  Something on our smart phones that could be in the hands of everybody?  I did enter a Geiger counter into the science fair but did not win... you see I could not disclose where I hid my (safe) radiation source so they thought it just picking up background radiation.

Returning to Blog Posting Soon

Returning to Blog Posting Soon

L. Edgar Otto   November 2013

* * *

Trans-generational Analogs of Higgs Fields In Quasic SUSY Q Theory

Trans-generational Analogs of Higgs Fields In Quasic SUSY Q Theory

L. Edgar Otto  October 29, 2013

Intuitive simplification in cosmology while excessive but replete in potential, by the nonnecessity of human imagination, may ground. Standard theory via quasic trans-generational analogs as supersymmetric Higgs fields defining quantum gravity. SUSY - Q.

I.  The quasic structure describes the particles of the standard theory with that of general cosmological and biological entities...  As Penrose suggested about the QM theory as equivalent descriptions, the idea of an emerging time implies the idea of consciousness as a dynamic influence as creative.

II. Current ideas relating to black holes, equivalence principles, dark matter, and properties of linear or plane lattices of what happens on the nano-scale for magnetism is not only a fractal energy but that of holographic solutions with proper information algorithmic and particle physical structure.  In this formulation the natural ideas of antimatter-matter, hidden or dark (calyptic) matter, and leptons as a fourth level and Higgs as a 17 particle and so on... is the natural SUSYQ idea of symmetry.

III. The contributions of inertia as in the form of mass or gravity obeys this general structure where the measures of the specific cases should be worked out.

IV. In relation to quasifinite momentum of light substance to the dark influence of black holes as a plane of limited extent (as if a disc or complex number field) we suggest the explanation as to why our galaxy oscillated up and down to the disc as well as general objects move in one direction... and that in the totality or Omnium of the Planck map view we may have differences of value in preferred entangled chiral directions
This akin to the solar cycle.

V. May we not expect higher field and particles of the Higgs like variety at least to four or five generations and that the symmetry breaking is not necessarily spontaneous

VI. The general idea is that in the 3+1 formalism the mediators represent the three of four dimensions of an Euclidean orthogon in question.  Complimentarity of such supermirrors exists also up to octonions.  The quasic ordering 00 01 10 11 (in a plane) comes up in matrices and determinant theory

* * * * *

Big Baby Bounce or Inflation and Other Unnecessary Ghost Force Assumptions

Big Baby Bounce or Inflation and Other Unnecessary Ghost Force Assumptions

L. Edgar Otto   24 October, 2013

I cannot find the comment I posted, the realization that at some point an idea was foundation enough that it led me to follow many other things... sometimes the telling of something to someone in a social context awakens in oneself a clearer and more detailed comprehension of what one is more deeply trying to say.  I thought it was casually said on Sabine's facebook page.

Casually, that in a sense as far as dark matter the universe itself is a gravitational lens... but that is not a new idea other than seeing the cosmos as if an analog to our collider... that is to see the  idea of light from a beginning as a dynamic system, a combination of some of our physics debates and ideas.  So I read a report that in a cyclic universe the inflation concept is not needed to account for isometry (and that from previous cycles of the universe the small close regions of new structures is shown possible by the usual modern physics)  I think as computer simulation thought experiments...  I will find all the links and post them here one day.

I did not post this "We ultimately cannot distinguish the cyclic universe from those of a more intrinsically linear model, that is the wave particle duality can have dimensionless scaling to which in an open or partly open universe renders this a principle that seeks unity as does our search for a unified physics.

I said that if we go to the beginning or as far as we can see into the sky maps, what may be the sort of math or physics as if beneath the Planck scale that as a statistics and continuity is in the main a ubiquitous universal law, a sort of isometry... How we in fact resolve things like Cantors transfinite numbers at least in the lower levels of such applied to structures of dimensions.  That is with finer data we could see from any such beginning in a sea of continuous or discrete (geometric points such as orthogons and in them orthogons and so on... we would find the hot and cold spot more an more like a lattice of which in the dynamics we observe the general diversity of structures and guarantees the isometry of this intelligible universe in general.

As quasi-finite or contiguous the "atmosphere" is observed on many levels of which it seems the new results of things like superconductivity, graphene, magnetism and the study of the fluid forms of small layers as in Sabine's recent posts from her time in Sweden, as a third way a sort of quantum foam level in flatland that we view out from the middle scales and does relate to the influence of the Casmir and dark effects... and somehow what we mean by inertia as if a measure of mass or gravity.

If as we may imagine the points of such structures, and the deeper laws for particle generations not just flavor changes of neutrinos by quantum ideas, moreover the hierarchy of broken symmetry not spontaneous only but as a given including other structures, lines, curves and so on then this foundation of things is a given, and while it can explain ghost forces it does not need such a force in itself necessarily short of the usual assumed unlimited ideas of a Deity and those philosophic issues... (the Theotericontinuum).  the assumption of the lesser ghosts as a defect of the inflation idea that some assume has to have an explanation, perhaps casual, something to explain the source of such light is not needed but as a working idea for this foundational given.

Of course the quasic idea does not distinguish at  the singularity level, where we face the questions like why the world rather than not the world, the idea of nothingness absolutely and as quiet instead of sucking things out from a container or vacuum when a vacuum can exist in a pure form with no such higher vibrations or equations only blowing up out from finer foam.  For we answser in the general distinguishing of superimposition, issues of locality, the many and one of things like he universe, the direction and imbalances of  pairs of material, anti-material or neutral things that are somehow chiral-parity but cancelling out. one or many universes the same thing.  Yet we may in knowing his foundational physics actually create physical models such as the ideas of super-partners for these are not foundational. in the deepest sense- that is while we may create stars from scratch it is not clear it is possible to create a universe in the vague sense of it.

Now, having achieved this level of theory comprehension let us not sit on our laurels for there may be deeper surprised yet and a civilization should not fossilize against new foundational breakthroughs for time itself is a unity in the quasifinite sense...physics will remain, at least for now, something at the frontier forever interesting and something intimate to our thoughts, experiments, and observations. If we declare some things as impossible or this or that an illusion let us make sure that the limitations are not a defect in our thinking itself, a sense of certainty too soon.

* * * * *
By way of review:

When it rains it pours. relevant articles beneath insulation topologically sideways in the quantum foam...

relevant tech 1  science daily articles

relevant tech2

relevant tech 3

relevant tech 4

relevant tech 5

TGD comments

viXra blog comments

More Lubosity   I quote:  "This seems really necessary because one may at least formally calculate the speed of sound in the environment as
v2soundc2=∣∣∣∂p∂ρ∣∣∣
and if |w|>1, we would get a sound speed that is greater than the speed of light! Alternatively, if the component Tzz were negative and greater than T00 in its magnitude, you could go to a highly boosted frame in which you would have T0′0′<0 .="" a="" allowed="" along="" also="" bad="" be="" blame="" constant="" cosmological="" could="" created="" density="" energy="" equations="" especially="" for="" global="" have="" if="" in="" is="" localized="" marginally="" modifications="" momentum="" negative="" non-object="" nothing="" objects="" of="" on="" out="" p="" positive-energy="" regardless="" seems="" similar="" so="" some="" the="" their="" they="" this="" unstable.="" vacuum="" well-behaved="" with="" would="" you="">


My casual remark that within these rather geometric higher dimensional symmetries of physics that we could perhaps build a sun from scratch I really did think in the realm of philosophy and is found sometimes in science fiction... are objects related to the field or not as in Einstein's cosmic background concept?

synchronicity again - this after seeing this photo on facebook:

Lubosity2  Firewalls I find it interesting... in this brave attempt of resolving such paradoxes using the last swan song of quantum framework written as it was toward the favorable by Lubos... It accepts casually several of the demeaned intuitions of some of our alternative as well as professional theory physicists.  Welcome to pushing the paradoxes into a higher level of physical reality as if the issue is solved by such a balanced in method but isolate hierarchy of Chinese dolls... it will not allow in itself the extension of the uncertainty principle (outside this wall of ghostly ignorance to which it seems to smugly set with the usual resolutions of paradoxes just touching on thing like Hilbert space embedded and vaguely defined mirrors. I mean do we trade the question of naked singularity into a wide field of geometric naked non-singularity and what of conservation laws that even string theory does not dare to answer, nor the idea of a naked non-singularity as an arbitrary choice?)  This has me wondering just how much the gods and disciples of theorists really know what they believe.  Especially how this related to say dark substance ideas.  Where is the same  idea... that is after all the realization of just how dynamic the universe is or has to be in such models, entropy better grounded and so on...  So the information on the outside is that on the inside? what then describes these ghostly dynamic emergent differences in idea such as holography.  Where in particular is the wider idea that we could use to extend the ideas of string and brane theory in these binary ideas of continuity?  Do I conclude in this narrow focus, after all not so much a wave equation as some reason the matrices of Hissenberg sift thru what can be the closed span of physical reality, dynamic, deeper or otherwise, that our humble correspondent has switched sides to the Loop Quantum Camp so as to guarantee that paradox such that he maintains the quantum formalism and seems to shore up its scope to nothing deeper we can know of the various descriptions of but one form of black holes.  Still there seems to be a general awakening in the wind as strange perhaps as we imagined evolving to new layers of consciousness as dark atoms in the work on such wormhole ideas and p-adics already considered by Pitaken in TGD.  The paper was not bad work and it was difficult work but we have not resolved the paradoxes at the greater unity or intelligibly of the foundations...  What do we lose by holding to this sort of theory that it stays around?  We lose the predictability of some technical effects and biological understanding now focusing to new levels by vague guesses as the technical access goes - but ever so slowly.  I get the feeling that Lubos thinks we will deficate our pants as we are not potty trained and that the only purpose of this report of a novel and exciting if not advanced enough idea when he seems to need to change his diaperohedron.

* * *  addenum on Oct.25, 2013  * * * * then late Oct. 25 :

I keep thinking about what I think I saw in a shared link on fb from Sabine...  namely a  physical experiment that is a hardware form of my unresolved teleoscoping information theory in my manuscripts of 1995 trying to recall what I had seen in 74.  Book:  Instruction and Being.   It seemed all to easy to work the problems out in a plane instead of a line to see what preceded by what can follow what and where loops would fall out of the determinism (which lately I see proves an advantage)  I think it was the way I set up the information in the thematic dial...  still, this suggests that after such "super?determinism" there are still issues or concepts to be resolved.  What would the technology effects on the nano scale be if we made a fiber or lattice plane of these linear things as to how they act between them and to each other...?  Can this effect  be coupled to particle data such that we can, if we limit the direction of the apparatus, to see them as in cosmic rays?  Quasi holographic and quasi fractal models can have a part in all this.   A C D B as linear...

* * * * *

Lubos Implodes into Quantum Stringy Foam

Lubos Implodes into Quantum Stringy Foam

L. Edgar Otto    October 22, 2013

I almost did not bother to read anymore of our humble correspondent's blogspot but hoping there was some meat in the initial title relating to the idea that some claim a string (now how we get from that to M theory without just more confusion and complication is the same issue or problem) it has zero dimensions - and we accept that it is unreachable... obviously the quantum view as time the thermodynamic summing as an arrow as if a string (despite its contribution in theory, even if not a complete one for physics) which in fact are still not effective for problems of symmetry that does not go far into what are the solid laws of thermodynamics and not tentative speculations.  He bans all the so called quantum theory detractors, citing history on one hand as a settled situation and on the other hand space as a wide landscape that can reach the same sort of geometric solutions for a given space.  But this is not a principle to which he divides theory into the quantitative and qualitative as if there cannot be more subtle third or more terms or physics (this is after all not just an appeal to a unified physics in a sort of Marxian synthesis (a Greek idea really from the position of characters in a play to which string theory by itself cannot be the God in the Machine to solve the plot- while there is humor in that some who watch the play in the amphitheater of public debate just have not evolved their understanding to be aware of the irony.  I would imagine Lubos at a crossroad where it was hoped his contributions, of which there are some as reporting on historical figures, has walled himself off from the dialog to which we may have to give up the hope that his freedom found in the wider possibilities of physics that QM seems to give him would not constrain him into a narrow domed firewall of introspection.

Yes, dear Lubos, it is your blog and my offense that you demean the likes of Baez or Sabine after what seems a long thought out discussion is about as mediocre as my reporting it on my personal blog to which we should agree not to waste each others time.  Would the logic not follow from your assertions that time may not be so solid a concept and space in structure (the so called amplitudohedron and so on) the source of rational physics? Is your concept of time so linear... yes, a great metaphor that we do not feel the train moving while we are in it... but time itself if it does indeed violate Lorentz (yet the vase and broken vase then it coming together again is not foreign to the idea that what appears illusion cannot find a final synthesis) then reading your take on history seems concerned with different eras and ideologies such that the coherence and consistency of your view stands well as far as it goes but is a mystery of hidden values that is unlikely to appear even with great sigmas of data and intelligence close to the best of possible general theories.

Clearly, even if the secret to our minds and body is reduced to the quality of our DNA (after all is chemistry not about quantum theory as a foundation?) we have the violation of symmetry in the universe of ones multi-cellular flesh that as recently suggested going to the nuts and bolts of the chemicals involved regardless of issues of locality... the cells of  a hierarchy of tissue (and perhaps our thoughts) age differently.  Yes, to the baboon our lifespan is longer and we are wiser due to a more coherent brain by superior sperm (as you say look for these articles in "Nude Scientist")  But how dare you think your wisdom is more advanced and contemporary than any of our lady scientists whose boobs have aged much faster than you and have had a much longer experience with the nature of gravity?

* * * * *