Nature's Desire for Symmetric Balance

Nature's Desire for Symmetric Balance

(A recapitulation on parallel notions in the quasic take on the new physics)
( or The Naked Singularity) (or Time as the Eighth Dimension)

[Note: I was going to complete the 24 cube alternate and general rotation colors but left my little cube home that would have made it fast and easy. I made that cube yesterday after finding 3 x 5 index cards and a glue stick. I wish I did not have to do so much computations or other work over and over again.]

Clearly, as we strive to make clearer what we mean by dimensions and other terms of physics and philosophy, we encounter notions that seem to get mathematically more complex. But in this complexity we find the higher degrees of configuration freedom in the parallel where nature and our visions strive to achieve, logically and intelligibly, a balance of its symmetries. A sort of "magic squaring" of higher abstract (wildcard) structures that accumulate and distinguishes atoms.

From this same general idea living systems express themselves in such differentiation and integrations of balances which, while a quantum chemical description is fundamental the relevance of the quasic view is as much fundamental.

The naked singularities of the wildcard coordinates are a grounding to understand where some of the phenomena we have named in nature has their effects- mass and gravity come to mind. But the expression of these beyond the topology and arithmetic, beyond uncertainty as a tool, is a general pattern of potentials that builds on and seeks general balance in the depths and span of matter and energy, light and dark.

No one seems to take seriously my early comments (once on a university radio between music sets) that there is a limit to the atomic number (120) on mathematical grounds that are becoming clearer and clearer as the decades of this notion goes by. Lately there seems to be a problem in the building up of atoms beyond Iron in the super novas- most likely around half the possible (four dimensional elements).

In an orthogon of squares (designated as branes connected at their zero or infinite boundaries) in any dimension these have a certain symmetry. In what dimensions then to systems of 24 apply? They apply in two space and four space (which by some string representation is 6 space or 2^6.
The notation in yesterdays post of 8 cubes and 4 x 4 informational coordinate bit patterns also shows up in 8 dimensions. Again we try to relate the octonians and quaternions here from one view. In particular, we imagine cubes with faces of a higher n x n value. For the eight cubes in yesterday illustration can be colored black and white depending on if viewed from the inside or outside of one of the 8 cubes. These I called the Zebra or Piano dice as a puzzle pastime. But we can clearly see the case extends up to higher dimensions.

Such considerations imply three particle generations at six dimension and four at eight dimensions. By such notation the intelligibility and logic of this is built in. So are the higher freedoms when we limit patterns to certain discrete global connectivity. For we see that there are only 15 of the 16 as one is the singularity (or better yet associated with a central concrete singularity.) Thus we exclude 15 of them technically and independently for 15 x 16 = 240 which is the number of 8spheres around a central one. In a philosophic sense the 8 added for 248 which seems to have taken a group of mathematicians very long to enumerate is in a sense the notion that time is the eight dimension as said of 4."

This suggests to me a range of notations based on Soma cubes or unfolding hypercubes. It also suggests that at a certain threshold new symbols and name designations are a natural part of general growth- but this too eventually has it limits of the magic number and square sort of balance of the symmetry and purposes of our living consciousness.

Of course some of the terms are humorous, whistling in the dark, (my artist roommate seems to have entered his blue ball period and I hesitate to host them). Now, the debaters here seem to be saying- in the formal "black holes have hair" that the only such hair is either kinky and curly or straight. In my case maybe the notions reflect that that I descend from the strait and bald to see lines over the twists and turns- and a little of the gray code over the blue and red- and that I grow bald! Oh well, I thought of some formal terms- quasium for that perhaps higher computational new thing element.

It took me awhile to see why some theoreticians would limit things to the ten dimensions when we so define dimensions that way- but this happens when stuff in the universe balances as another explanation also, a parallel if not the same one. The situation can still become more complicated but the simple ideas when expanded are already in our body of symbols and notions of number theory.

All this evokes the terms magic and magical, magic numbers, magic squares- but it is really but a new reductionist magic in the new physics. What sort of idea of multiverses would it be if in some of those parallel we can have even further complexities of the configuration of elements (the nuclei in our own system may be analogs of this electron configuration- so I mean can our notions exceed that ?) When can our theoreticians reach the threshold where they can understand and even ask this question- intuitively I asked it of the possible creativity and grounding by quasars early on and what laws may be more complex within them.

* * *

facebook status:
L. Edgar Otto
The first tool of manufacturing and production is a flat surface. It is a limitation really to flare and round edges off that limits the possibilities in the long run. "Man's achievement in architecture", says Santayana, "was the taking of the Euclidean plane as we imagine the surface of a lake, and standing it on edge". In the new physics this plane is everywhere.

* * *