Variegated Calculus and Alternative Interpretations of Wildcard Non-necessity of Physical Uncertainty

Variegated Calculus and Alternative Interpretations of
Wildcard Non-necessity of Physical Uncertainty

L.  Edgar  Otto         17 July, 2013


Coast to Coast last night had a show on Tesla which was unusually clear as to the claims of his place in history and theories contrary to the usual stance toward the paranormal and conspiracy speculations. I find it remarkable that in the debate between quantum field theory and zero point energy as to how they apply the logic involving the discrete and the absolute in the calculus of variations I reached some of the same conclusions to which I find it amazing our top physicists and engineers do not know the solid history and literature. Let us not underestimate the saints of American Inventors for many of the principles of one or the other of these core views are devices you now use more than a century later. But as to why some of Tesla's inventions did not work that needs a new physics, a calculus of variegation's more than one of variation. The solution goes back to the wildcard paradoxical logic involved as to what is zero or one, one or many, and less than a wider vision the ideas of chaos can be harnessed to support contradictory views as to the universes fundamental nature, the idea of an aether or vibrating field vacuum or not... the charging docks and smartphones and way to make profit from them were imagined long ago by Tesla. But why cannot Higgs-like entities break into eight gluon-like ones of broken super-symmetry?


L. Edgar Otto This idea of causation implied by relativity viewed as continuous time from one end of this conceptual spectrum or a totally discrete corpuscular view is not enough to explain our concepts of least action as physics. I can show that the parity of adjacent orthogonal cells is represented truly by the quasic binary base physics of the plane (brane) or the dimension in question and the shifting between these is transitive or conserved over n-space representations. (I post this here (facebook now here on blogspot)  for the moment as some have taken up the issue of Tesla and such thoughts in new papers like arXiv that I read as if his theory or what we may think of as a bias for the reductionism of quantum bases in the Feynman tradition.)


* * * * * * * *

Is Quantum Mechanics as Dead as Classical Theory

Is Quantum Mechanics as Dead as Classical Theory

L. Edgar Otto   July 15, 2013

 Lubos Motl does not seem to realize that quantum mechanics is also dead (actually like classical before it transformed) into a greater generalization where a reasonably sane person may conclude after seeing clearly with effort beyond issues of top down or bottom up mental state logic.  This overall structure of models persists and is mulled over in the collective wisdom of the unknown as if such processes being scientific self-falsifies and has a natural time-like direction even in general for that essential difference in local and non-local symmetries.

How do we determine if Tesla's views are used as some claim covertly by the worlds hidden powers so as to say control the weather or build electrostatic principled aircraft?  Is the logic of the contrails in parallel sound to shift the weather by the fact of introduction (in a hierarchy of atmosphere levels including at the ocean) not that of matter changing and interacting with a field, one moreover a generalization of the reductionist simplicity of Feynman diagrams?  That an atom introduced can from behind the scenes not be just a neutral entity but from some dimensional representation a dynamic one  with real effects in the chaotic turbulence (like said of the plankton today in the science magazines for a crude mere 3D analogy).

But a better example (with of course the quasic and projection view of a 2D brane into nD with a sense of momenta restrained or conserved and further understanding of atoms and the projection plane real and complex) would be this comment to Sabine Hossenfelder I posted today on the cosmic rays (I understood this for a long time now before someone suggested some were of quasar or further out origins):

L. Edgar Otto This data looks promising... as muons are catalysts for fusion we can certainly (in this natural but vertical collider...extend the concept (of chirality and reintegration) to similar particles in the generation (electrons...tauons... more) to which we should find evidence of a surplus and local excess of matter beyond the standard monster group 4 natural dimensional case of 120 elements thus higher symmetry of "super-nuclei" breaking as in the case of elements that cannot be explained from supernova but by some other physical process. In the reintegration we do not claim something beyond Lorentz or relativity but a deeper generalization of it...not all such material relations are compressed when there are two solutions for such integration's.

comment to Sabine Hossenfelder on facebook july 15th 2013

* * * *

Next day on fb:  L. Edgar Otto This set of artificial objects (much like Higgs as particles if we must have a sense of the tangible) in color combinatioric interlacing algebras describe physics as sub-matrices from a quasic quasifinite view of a hierarchy of Hessian polytope n-dimensional symmetry. The simplest of them perhaps. These algebras can generalize to multiple embedding depending on what we desire to describe and in what direction of a linear but more general law of matter-gravity quasi-condensation.

L. Edgar Otto Sabine...thanks for the link to the video on the Higgs discovery... I found it half entertaining and informative yet very much a product of the way history is interpreted as self serving yet rather ineffective as a promotion of the enterprise. The simple experiment with the magnets to illustrate forces arising in symmetry breaking was very clear yet did not cost billions of dollars and thousands of engineers. I was disappointed with the ending that just did not seem to ask the right questions. Part of it is the way the data is analyzed and the way physicists are developed in the University of Wisconsin in Madison. While the recent era does seem to accelerate the history of discoveries how can they not see such eras may accelerate even faster from the view of the next generation? The Higgs is more about new principles than if it is a physicality as field or particle and supersymmetry should be too obvious to question as well higher dimensions. It is at least a reduced neutral superparticle but the breaking of symmetry is not just a binary tree of some origin of which (save for the magnet design to sort such debris) we cannot say if its influence is just top down or bottom up in the structural design of influence via vacua. I hold it as untruth the remark by the lecturer that we "we cannot put such laws into a simple formula" quantum theory does not reach into what is going on at the extremes, even with dark matter ideas. The simple diagrams (Feynman's simplicity belong to an earlier age of too much simplicity even in the algebra of closed loops in the binary decay that cannot really explain generations.) One can judge the lecture by its humor as deep or shallow say in regard to the big bang as a sit come or no longer the theory yet "was a good idea" at the time.

L. Edgar Otto "you get Sally, I'll take Sue... doesnt matter much either one will do... Cocaine going round in my brain..." is the SUSY song that comes to mind here... and E.O. Wison and Einstein and IBM founders on Imagination. Can we not have a more general theory unifying the string and qm-gravity viewpoints? What was found in the colliders could have been models before hand by geometric and algebraic roles and constraints provided we state with the simple higher polytopes (of which I imagine the Higgy things may be in their self interaction) all this can be put into rather simple matrix theory here these Hessian (polytopes or cosmic rays) fit logically together.

I did not mention this idea of a generalization dimensionally of my Calyptic cube puzzle where we use color coding to show the design structure of the 36 face 6 cubes 4 at a time color matching externally or internally in opposition on the half shell mirrors... these Calyptons if we have to give them a physical name like a particle do make a fractal like open quasic hierarcy and may be extended to even higher sets of super symmetry.

* * * 
Are the gluons not such an eight cornered orthogon in its partial symmetric conception of mirrors and half mirrors they the fulcrum?

The Military Industrial Complex Plane

The Military Industrial Complex Plane

(Cosmic Landscaping by Material I-stamp Inflation by Real and Virtual Post-Economic Hidden I-bits in Free Energy or Dark Matter Toxicity of Beliefs Generalizing Feynman Contrails)

L. Edgar Otto             July 14, 2013

Outside systems of advertising and unsustainable cycles of growth where does theory and applications of open or hidden wisdom distinguish actual and social quantum gravity from the atmosphere and weather in the inventions or synthetic thought experiments of Tesla as if crackpot magic or that we can interpret as the sanity reduced by consensus, power centers, making concrete some arbitrary rule of law debated by statistics or disinformation, science as the placebo or opiates for the masses appearing as peer reviewed formal but irrelevant papers of half truths before a wider theory that contains a wider span of predictability and understanding of deeper symmetries and dimensions akin to nature's living systems self-inflicted like lines and scars on cutters begging for release or attention in the risk or gamble and the hedges of insurance as if in reality the world is so limited and fixed there can be in closed minds scientific guarantees?

But can we see the light of new physics while in the transition, or perhaps in reflection only as the grid shifts beyond its span and speed of light and enlightenment to which
a closed system and its products, its shock value at the fronts and frontiers come to tranquil rest and not compressed and growing fires of fusion in branching space and lightning as our age always relatively a golden age and dawn cannot understand the ghost writers of greater hidden wisdom have moved on far from the understanding in the public some think new when they so retro-engineer rumors of gold or report a view of history that civilization reached a peak and only blind pathways of tradition chain us to their creeping impotency as if the scorched earth may fill the cosmos?

1956 licking Green stamps... or Monopoly is back at McDonald's

* * * * *

Through Time's Discontinuities

Through Time's Discontinuities

L. Edgar Otto   Tuesday, 09 July, 2013

The unity of our spirit and soul embedded in time over the span of a lifetime depends on the presence of all past events that can survive structures of discontinuity or at least allow that these pass by us in influence as if a careful walk over thin ice over a chasm.  Simply, to be a whole person in relation to the universe one has to acknowledge or accept what events still present form the special development of our psyches.  This is not a measure in itself of some absolute given or fact of natural law, reduced to the dynamics of the general flow of time as if at some level the dynamics of a star.  

For although the balance or mirror of our actions may not be seen or accessible in walls of memory or physical media of its storage in our depth and color within an adaptable private range of shifing variables and dimensionless constants we can have different eras between the discontinuity and the sum totals to which our comprehension and understanding of the world may seem from some level or span of views that some of us in what can be seen or gleaned of our existence over time, are failed stars. 

The sun is alive as we are and we do not just store its light... we amplify it.

Yet by default we may navigate the colors and shadows of this world, style uniquely its creative force as the origin of mysterious words or the possibilities within ourselves that we may guide the landscape of our navigation.  So to find wholeness thru quasifinite time in the quasi-finite universe of our selves, others, and what of direction we imagine as life's purpose both as sacred or profound.  Our time can only be measured or extended by our sense of the depth and span of our creative efforts.  Not our illusions of limits or fears in this world of the concepts of immortality that keeps our earthy souls half chained and our painting of our days half truths as if that is what it takes to face the immensity or our sense of the meaningless mundane.

Our minds in our era, in its complexity, both privately and collectively, resembles the evolution and structure of galaxies more so than the idea of a planet, star or simple particle in its simplicity as nature finds its focus in the now thru portals source and sinks of the creative quasars.

*  *  *

Somewhat relevant article appeared this afternoon:

Another:

Unified Systems as the TeslaScope

Unified Systems as the TeslaScope

L. Edgar Otto     Sunday, 07 July, 2013

We learn from nature the structures of nature's intelligible design, a point Tesla made and was an inspiration from his general views and discoveries in electricity.

I propose a series of simple experiments now hinted at by the new possibilities applying in thought our new theories.  From the view of Tesla fields around his coils, the complexity but similarity of direct or inductive electric laws, his field that may be an indicator of deeper structures, thus joining our probes of nature as if a micro or telescope, the holographic view as well presumed hidden symmetries fractally read - that which in its own contraints of theory matches that of strings in abstract and organic chemistry in the concrete to which geometry among the ideas of mathematics can measure.

Of a central light in such a field we may transfer the power to other places far from the filed.  Is this not the hint of what we observe as if an organization of space itself as if ball lightning?  So what happens if around the surrounding lights they have surrounding lights...do they also take from the central whole? Is this situation not a question of the reality or existence of higher dimensions in the usual sense as well that from a view of our reasoning on super symmetries?

What beyond the confines of three space would an array of gyroscopes do in spin, react, be still to all right angles to the higher dimension- that the nonlinear idea defining conservation of momentum so expressed in angles?

Yet if the information is carried in a deeper form like the DNA or RNA that finds the nodes and focus at a distance within an organism so to physically travel and stand on its point combinational superposition's and local sense of specific paths and directions- would the light not travel to specific paths so as to change the amount of light, perhaps encoded as to its colors like the stars?  The asymmetry of such distinctions of our grounding views that is the half illusion of forces that moves things over chirality and time and in the end defines what the unified view regards as mass and gravity as constants change and vary over innate time.

Our minds, its expression and development of consciousness, plasticity of growth or pausing in growth, the general flow or counter flow of theories and civilization can be seen as such a holographic teslascope at least to that beginning of complexity, that half contained yet reaching out of where such information goes.  Clock time does not save us from the differences of relativity as deeper mirrors of fissures in the landscape debate our ideas of ancient motion or of rest, nor does the relativity saves us from the discrete steps of the march of time.

More than what accelerates and what does not in our twin paradoxes we do not always match the deeper mirrors of what in the same description of vectors exists between objects as forces or from one object to another.  In effect although we rather than nature abhor an empty vacuum more so do not wanting to see or resolving to but one breath our single photon once know so half fear, we ask the wrong question as to how long or what measure in us and the universe our own lifetime.  Time so understood will be radically different from our historical speculations.

Of course we could use the quasic field as flat space or branes to indicate, decode the three space, weigh the differences from the neutral photons of light.  This I proposed at the beginnings of this blog.  But how may we in the natural dimensions of three space observe the more hidden particles directly, ghostly infered the neutrino momenta or its change of generations.  If we may conclude our sun will not explode thereby do we not also show the earth a dynamic system to which its changes shift and are complex as with that distinction of planets and question of the origin of life we find still levels of greater complexity?

* * * * *

As I have been saying, as we see what natures design tells us, and on my viXra comments.

* * * *
a little later, perhaps this is a major understanding of fields from the electron symmetry perspective- for can we not see the sun as a dynamic Tesla system...is not the difference in fission and fusion of  the elements a rise to less or more stability as to what materially predominates?  Now, by what twist of logic of which the current logic seems the contradiction can we measure such centers or nodes of stability such that we can have clear graphs to plot this innate matter antimatter difference in more general logic that must seem the far out logic- especially one asks the structural energy questions in terms of macro and mico physics?

Again, Kikergaard, "to the corkscrew the knife is crooked"  How then does nature distinguish them and which is favored or primary?  We experience time as if it is a confetti of explosions or if it is at absolute rest when it is to such dynamic systems we find abstract quasi-singularity centering... If our minds and consciousness work like this and deviations rather rare we can ask in still a higher paradox of indiscernment and indistinguishibility why the world moves in a direction or if our thoughts are so moving into these theoretical matters do they have any substance, quasi-purpose, limitedly defining conscousness at all?

* * * *

Facebook status inspired by NPR posts --- I was thinking of applying to go to school again just to have some credentials that in dialog lack of them is not held against me as I see in the mean spirited and narrow way the chaos of virtual action, the social gravity of it, leads to a marginalization of the people- save those in arbitrary elite power who deny an open access to our collective history and wisdom in the sciences including access to one's own original work.  I press the button to post the following with only the regret that I probably could have said it better.  In my day it was unthinkable we would spy on our own citizens and if we are to believe our leaders then is not the war officially over as well the suspension on that count in this paradox in our constitution Einstein pointed out?  I am not saying in this rant like post that the situation is hopeless or unmanageable... some could see tattoos for example as evidence of commitment in a world were one is not allowed to be neutral on many issues...but what is left save the arming of the people or the awakening to the fact that in the chaos the observers can be observed too, and just like our hibernation by the peaceful law abiding, these are blind to how they can be manipulated while they are asleep.  I doubt they will ever let me into school, not to find perhaps what is not there but to give back what good given to me and to posterity, to make it perhaps a little better at least suggest it do more than give lip service in its mask of ideals:

In and open society we should approach the differences of real life and virtual life interactions.  NPR just posted along these lines which is an issue of privacy needing exploration.  The difference was one of regrets for actions (statements, thoughts, statuses) in virtual postings and in real life regrets for inaction - what we did not disclose to others about our states of mind.  Since when does a virtual medium justify judgement from our thoughts and not our actions.  Where is the body evidence in a crime?  Can we profile people for what they may think then do and does that justify a social intervention before the facts.  How good was the security system anyway in the prevention of individual acts of violence.
In real life there is no difference if say we regret (or in sociology 40% regret) tattoos for these seem permanent or difficult to change, remove.  But is it any less virtual that branded by a physical action the police amplifying the right by minor charges photograph your tattoos for a data base of identification?  Our watchers or public media such as NPR cannot distinguish what sorts of action their own postings may come to haunt them (or their funding) with regret.  Sociology like this is not science but data collection for questionable interpretations by people with hidden identities if any, the formality that tries to justify the hangman's duty or evil thoughts behind a mask.
One publication by NPR links to the common myths some so easily or publicly accept that our constitution just does not fit nor the founders could foresee the needs of a more modern era.  But it seems clear in science as well what we understand that real and virtual system of our brain development that among the chaos of fragmented decorations that we can only see into the future to the extent we can see into our past. If our identities or reality exist because some sentient being sooner or later in time sees but one spark of our light then God is said to ground our reality... but those who understand this idea of God cannot by universal observation establish the reality of themselves as if to invent an all powerful, omnipresent, all knowing deity.  At least it cannot stand fooling all the people all of the time.

"If my thought dreams could be seen they would probably put my head in a guillotine..."   Bob Dylan

* * *

I should add on viXra Phil started and new thread on the the open access to science publication debate and this is also an important issue to me as to what of virtual books we have access to in the public library.  On top of all this what good is the technology if our intellectual work can vanish from the virtual cloud?  You see, social gravity is as difficult to do without better physics and mathematics as is what we feel is physical gravity to expand or explain.  Action and Inaction in both the virtual and real worlds needs a deeper level of unification and comprehension.  It is at least a multidimensional and developing set of dialectics.

"When I hear the world "culture"  I reach for my gun..."  A. Hitler
"Communism is soviets and electrification."  V. Lenin

How remarkable the internet has given new life to the old age of ideologies!

**

The Structure of an Evolving Galaxy as Super-Vortex Description

The Structure of an Evolving Galaxy as Super-Vortex Description

L. Edgar Otto      Saturday, 06 July, 2013

From a unified view of the new physics not reduced to questions of chirality only as an organizing holofractal supersymmetric system of field and force to the level of metaphysics of grounding existence or not as physicality alowing due consideration for multiplicity of styles of vacua and multi-dimensions, the innate structure of spiral type galaxies is obvious in their potential and concrete development.

* * *

nD Printing and the Sacred or Profane Quasifinite View

nD Printing and the Sacred or Profane Quasifinite View

L. Edgar Otto    July 4th, 2013

Happy Independence Day  a point of social gravity for a new era of understanding the general arithmetical stereonometry of Turing Machines, exotic and one sided surfaces not possible to make by conventional methods, as we enter a new era of theory and technology of substance and mind as we debate what is overt and hidden in nature's codes and symmetry.

* * *

Facebook status today:

We can see the universe as frozen fireworks or burning stone. Nine tenths of physics or government is under water. Like the inventors and robber barons in the days of steel, electricity and oil the social commons and hidden observers change and sometimes manipulate what they see or are changed by the observation held down contained orbits of self made destiny. But the threat of a tyranny to then is one on steroids to this now.

Think about our constitution and give it a passing thought at least as not a bad model to inspire but not impose upon the world. Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Franklin and the boys got it right and as old been remarked on the sun and horizon carved on the chairs of congress - It is not clear that this speaks of sunrise or sunset- we have a republic if we can keep it."

The year anniversary of the "discovery" of the Higgs particle does not tell us to chose by our costly primitive experiments if the world is stable or unstable. Like people's hearts and social gravity of governments real and virtual it tells us the universe is quasi-stable. We should give good weight to our passionate sides of current debates for a more open yet unified new era of wisdom. Lockean inquiry is not a bad way to think about the problems as we climb up from another swing of the pendulum with wings in oversight looking down at a wider new worlds of fertile wealth or the same worn out mud.

* * *

This wider view stays with me like a friend and gives me the ability to picture states and questions from a more general view so as to discern what is the actual or probable truth of a social or physics model and moreover the debates on what level consciousness may consist as in its underlying physics - the simple count or intelligibility for example even by those who feel or insert mystery in hidden dimensions and symmerty to which it forms some basis that seems to connect to what some imagine with assertions of tangible facts of number systems and ancient civilizations in designs.  Each as science or pseudoscience can be understood from the viewpoint of those who take these positions if we intellectually reduce the competing models to a physical fulcrum of zero yet not to lose it in the process from an overview.

If we do not have a more general physics we may not be able to know the truth of what something done or made such as chemicals supposedly harmless or not in the symmetry of gene modification for example.  From one side of this current debate the effects are zero - from the other side the truth of it speaks more of the magic of partially known facts carrying imagination.  But the general quasifinite needs not be in such a narrow and simple balance nor necessarily connected in the raw effects multi-see-saw.

* * * 

Response to Aldus on facebook and to the next generation of physicists in general:

Альбус К. Клиффорд

Happy 4th of July everyone!!! HiggsDependence day after the past year!!!!!!XD

L. Edgar Otto So we discovered is quasi-stable (metastable the usual term)- in a sense we can ask what gives the Higg-like entities a mass? Moreover, what would give it some form of dark matter properties? The bulk of physics is like and iceberg 9 tenths under water. Where would the universe go anyway if it fell apart? What did you have in mind with that profile drawing if not a sense of some sort of entities way beyond the Higgs idea?

L. Edgar Otto Keep up your keen interest in physics. It is priceless and promising and one day when our world view is more open yet unified we will understand the mind and society too including what some keep in stealth of their wisdom and observation as our world awakens to a new era.

* * * *

After writing this I found this wonderful page on Google Plus not knowing the 3D technology has come so far so rapidly nor that such general stereonometry can make our understanding of the world simpler and easier even for our more human methods of pattern perception and design -  a multversal turing project is part of the picture of counting and structures as well in our quasi-unstable and half predictable projects of and to understand the omnium, the universe.

* *

To Aldus a little later on facebook as he is excited about this article on a New force on dark matter which of course should be a structural or quasic one:  not in the usual sense of force or particles at all.

The appeal to a fifth force or dimension comes up from time to time- what does this paper say other than things are more complicated than the seem?   From my view this article speaks of a long line of doing physics with half a deck and part of a brain that old dark matter the cannot see in their minds.  It does not even begin to be a radical new theory but the same old division in physics unsolved now for a century.  It is simple minded crapola and a dead end and breeds a generation of zombies.  Be careful in whom you admire and what you read for in your caring there are forces that merely feed off and steal you dreams.  Heck, and I am nobody and untrained but I can see the obvious.  The wild cards in nature can pivot = zero so the physics of it all begins to see enough to become aware there is a vast future and intelligence in the darkness in themselves hinted now of what they do not know.  Invisible wild card trivially but one.

*=0

* * * * *
Comment to SH on facebook next day:  on this article linked to her clear understanding of possible deeper theory that is suggested and more scientifically sound in our analysis of superconductivity.

The description can be mirrored information wise with the string like phenomenon on the surface and the quantum theory in the volume. Let us call it fractal duality in a holofractal geometry that varies in time (consequently so called dark like laws) as a simple structural frame or pivot for variations and precipitation into the physicality at boundaries.  The problem is simply we have not defined the idea of dimensions well, especially if like black holes in total systems at rest at quasifinite singularity.  I will post this (to this current page if anyone is here) see the diagram (of my previous posting- or the notations I call Quasic laws of motion)  Not in the next two years a wider theory but a view already a long time here.  Surface and volume are ultimately equivalent information wise considering simple space structures.

In the concrete it can be a matter of perceptual choice if we are to describe a system of singularities as having an origin in time so inflates as a model or with the proposed hierarchy of black hole like entities a total picture if anywhere is a span over time to which all such multiplicty centers in the multiverse go beyond scales or forces to find a baffling but diffuse unity again. Let us recall the continuum hypothesis and the axiom of choice are considered independent of the rest of arithmetical ZF axioms.

*

I have referred in past posts to Jokers, Grand Jokers and the like in terms of musical and color theory symmetry in relation to structures sacred and profane from the informational intuitive view.  This of course poetic terms...the general theory above of course suggests the DNA as part of the explanation for our fluid and more general idea of consciousness akin to these treated as if interior strings and the illusion of emergence or consciousness or it an undefiend give as a give a hologram of neuroscience nerve complexity which for a long time now goes beyond multilevel ideas of connectionism in holographic development and modeling alone.  Again, I too imagined finally the conclusion of the above cited articles in that there can be some evidence by theory and thought for the aspects of string theory and other ideas.  Pinker in his books suggest we can orient things in three dimensions as well as two when we consider the vague boundaries of peripheral vision of things seen - we can also orient things in higher but condensed down dimensions.  If we deny this aspect of an unobservable materiality say in the glorious view of quantum gravity alone and the string-brane ideas set to zero we can imagine at once a very wide multidimensional field that would contain the stars and galaxies in that description of evolution as merging or being created at once or in real time in the theories requiring the ideas of pairs and chirality (albeit in a reduced condensed picture that nevertheless does not lose the information, that is the understanding that the universe does exist.)  I was toying and trying to revise the following drawing with numerically adjusted to spectral and shadow colors last night for the use of music properties as well the implied count of the stars in the 48 star flag.

*****
July 5

More on this encountered in the social media:

The problem is we have not learned to see the world from a higher perspective- not evolved our
educated our minds so to speak without a struggle thru interpretative chaos.  Such articles would suggest that attraction or repulsion is ultimately an equivalent state in matters of what is gravity or what is the description of force between charged particles and all this mirrored in the higher state of view to which we fight with bias toward part of it we regard as real. It is no more true to say two gallaxies we observe are flying apart than coming together as to what time is and how it generates asymmetry.  Maybe it is low current crap, maybe true in fact as well as theory but in any case it seems diverse despite our mental resistance (or should I say Mhosistene?  Einstein was right on the importance of imagination over this schizophrenic or autistic era of a century of failed physics or as leave the bounds of earth into our sense of the mystical unknown.  But I blame the universities who sell disinformation as education and credentials for the elite who now find they are no longer viable as such.

Let us occupy the future as this although too simple a theory is in the right direction- rather than take the usual adolescent stance of negativity and skepticism as if this justifies in a moral clubbing our own failed existences while we feel bound to an era where expectations for at least a decent job are not only thwarted but raise the debt slavery in all people including those thought to be the best and brightest in our day. Transparency can go over our heads when it comes to a dialog for discerning ignorance as we illy define what is our ideas of democracy...investment in science with wisdom is essential for our birthrights and futures.

*  *  *  *

Next day after viewing Tesla's Ambassadors and other YouTube videos on his inventions and those who emulate him.

Tesla ...  his alternatives at the dawn of electrification of which there is little doubt much of his engineering could be useful- for example a method of computer development from a one sided simpler view if we had gone down that alternative history for development- but how do we show where it different from the quantum computer development?  A lot of mystical claims are also made for this positive and negative natural balancing, the yin and yang of it as well inventors with claims of limitless energy.  This dialectical principle if Ingles was heeded would have advanced electronic theory 50 years as well this yin yang principle by Tesla.  Without the new physics it is hard to reason out the claims... so many respected theorists and publications now present us as science views now as outrageously speculative not knowing they are still in the old physics paradigm of which the narrow view of how the universe works is the same old mysticism of partial understanding. Future progress cannot endure on half truths with Utopian promises... each has to supply the effort for as in the Tesla field we have limited and made unreliable our assumption that power is a trade off from a center when it is not clear at all our sensible intuitions are so limited by our faith in the false scarcity of a narrow imagination for such physics or rumors that play with interpretations of truth.  As for equality, peace and love, and the like between all people- that is common sense nor an issue of free will or a balance of good and evil... not a product of science only but the imbalance where we choose beyond our wildest speculations as to what the world will soon give us for new toys into the next century to direct human effort.

* * * *
July 6th
for Kris on facebook on Tesla   The understanding of these core principles given depth historically in the stated list  Ld Kristoffer J Martin would you say that He fusion is a byproduct as some imagine linked to the theme mindset of this paper?  We do not need to imagine such physics channeled or given us by some ancient aliens or done in a level of a priesthood of secrecy by humans gods among us who have the power.  We have some choices as to how to influence the direction of the world.  The next social gravity era, having to adjust to the post-economic era, can be a dynamic and peaceful place but it is not a necessary reality anymore than the present state of things persisting is necessary.  The freedom to so choose also allows the concentration of power.  If in our imaginations some process where aliens are among us what would you say to them?  I would say "Are you talking to me?" as in the movie Taxi.  Tesla like all prophets generate followers who sometimes get it wrong in the legend and do things in his name he never advocated nor said.  This sorting out in the virtual world is also subject to such new physics laws- as wide at least as your vision of Regulus theory that encompasses wider intelligible geometric structures- but as technical as my comments here seem- the next era is simple to understand at least for a while and should be for the world soundly hopeful.

There is a difference in the need to know vs the want to know. In this climate of change (I mean we cannot authenticate the message but not the messenger nor the messenger but not the message- what is a leak and what is disinformation hedged to glean money from those who like a mass social movement taking on a life of its own? We need to better define what is information principle and not just where does it go in the black hole of secrecy.) if Tesla's papers were released no one would be able to understand or apply them as principles evidently.


* * *
Reply to my comment on Matti Pitkanen's blogspot this morning.