To Aldus a little later on facebook as he is excited about this article on a New force on dark matter which of course should be a structural or quasic one: not in the usual sense of force or particles at all.
The appeal to a fifth force or dimension comes up from time to time- what does this paper say other than things are more complicated than the seem? From my view this article speaks of a long line of doing physics with half a deck and part of a brain that old dark matter the cannot see in their minds. It does not even begin to be a radical new theory but the same old division in physics unsolved now for a century. It is simple minded crapola and a dead end and breeds a generation of zombies. Be careful in whom you admire and what you read for in your caring there are forces that merely feed off and steal you dreams. Heck, and I am nobody and untrained but I can see the obvious. The wild cards in nature can pivot = zero so the physics of it all begins to see enough to become aware there is a vast future and intelligence in the darkness in themselves hinted now of what they do not know. Invisible wild card trivially but one.
* * * * *
Comment to SH on facebook next day: on this article linked to her clear understanding of possible deeper theory that is suggested and more scientifically sound in our analysis of superconductivity.
The description can be mirrored information wise with the string like phenomenon on the surface and the quantum theory in the volume. Let us call it fractal duality in a holofractal geometry that varies in time (consequently so called dark like laws) as a simple structural frame or pivot for variations and precipitation into the physicality at boundaries. The problem is simply we have not defined the idea of dimensions well, especially if like black holes in total systems at rest at quasifinite singularity. I will post this (to this current page if anyone is here) see the diagram (of my previous posting- or the notations I call Quasic laws of motion) Not in the next two years a wider theory but a view already a long time here. Surface and volume are ultimately equivalent information wise considering simple space structures.
In the concrete it can be a matter of perceptual choice if we are to describe a system of singularities as having an origin in time so inflates as a model or with the proposed hierarchy of black hole like entities a total picture if anywhere is a span over time to which all such multiplicty centers in the multiverse go beyond scales or forces to find a baffling but diffuse unity again. Let us recall the continuum hypothesis and the axiom of choice are considered independent of the rest of arithmetical ZF axioms.
I have referred in past posts to Jokers, Grand Jokers and the like in terms of musical and color theory symmetry in relation to structures sacred and profane from the informational intuitive view. This of course poetic terms...the general theory above of course suggests the DNA as part of the explanation for our fluid and more general idea of consciousness akin to these treated as if interior strings and the illusion of emergence or consciousness or it an undefiend give as a give a hologram of neuroscience nerve complexity which for a long time now goes beyond multilevel ideas of connectionism in holographic development and modeling alone. Again, I too imagined finally the conclusion of the above cited articles in that there can be some evidence by theory and thought for the aspects of string theory and other ideas. Pinker in his books suggest we can orient things in three dimensions as well as two when we consider the vague boundaries of peripheral vision of things seen - we can also orient things in higher but condensed down dimensions. If we deny this aspect of an unobservable materiality say in the glorious view of quantum gravity alone and the string-brane ideas set to zero we can imagine at once a very wide multidimensional field that would contain the stars and galaxies in that description of evolution as merging or being created at once or in real time in the theories requiring the ideas of pairs and chirality (albeit in a reduced condensed picture that nevertheless does not lose the information, that is the understanding that the universe does exist.) I was toying and trying to revise the following drawing with numerically adjusted to spectral and shadow colors last night for the use of music properties as well the implied count of the stars in the 48 star flag.
More on this encountered in the social media:
The problem is we have not learned to see the world from a higher perspective- not evolved our
educated our minds so to speak without a struggle thru interpretative chaos. Such articles would suggest that attraction or repulsion is ultimately an equivalent state in matters of what is gravity or what is the description of force between charged particles and all this mirrored in the higher state of view to which we fight with bias toward part of it we regard as real. It is no more true to say two gallaxies we observe are flying apart than coming together as to what time is and how it generates asymmetry. Maybe it is low current crap, maybe true in fact as well as theory but in any case it seems diverse despite our mental resistance (or should I say Mhosistene? Einstein was right on the importance of imagination over this schizophrenic or autistic era of a century of failed physics or as leave the bounds of earth into our sense of the mystical unknown. But I blame the universities who sell disinformation as education and credentials for the elite who now find they are no longer viable as such.
Let us occupy the future as this although too simple a theory is in the right direction- rather than take the usual adolescent stance of negativity and skepticism as if this justifies in a moral clubbing our own failed existences while we feel bound to an era where expectations for at least a decent job are not only thwarted but raise the debt slavery in all people including those thought to be the best and brightest in our day. Transparency can go over our heads when it comes to a dialog for discerning ignorance as we illy define what is our ideas of democracy...investment in science with wisdom is essential for our birthrights and futures.
* * * *
Next day after viewing Tesla's Ambassadors and other YouTube videos on his inventions and those who emulate him.
Tesla ... his alternatives at the dawn of electrification of which there is little doubt much of his engineering could be useful- for example a method of computer development from a one sided simpler view if we had gone down that alternative history for development- but how do we show where it different from the quantum computer development? A lot of mystical claims are also made for this positive and negative natural balancing, the yin and yang of it as well inventors with claims of limitless energy. This dialectical principle if Ingles was heeded would have advanced electronic theory 50 years as well this yin yang principle by Tesla. Without the new physics it is hard to reason out the claims... so many respected theorists and publications now present us as science views now as outrageously speculative not knowing they are still in the old physics paradigm of which the narrow view of how the universe works is the same old mysticism of partial understanding. Future progress cannot endure on half truths with Utopian promises... each has to supply the effort for as in the Tesla field we have limited and made unreliable our assumption that power is a trade off from a center when it is not clear at all our sensible intuitions are so limited by our faith in the false scarcity of a narrow imagination for such physics or rumors that play with interpretations of truth. As for equality, peace and love, and the like between all people- that is common sense nor an issue of free will or a balance of good and evil... not a product of science only but the imbalance where we choose beyond our wildest speculations as to what the world will soon give us for new toys into the next century to direct human effort.
* * * *
for Kris on facebook on Tesla The understanding of these core principles given depth historically in the stated list Ld Kristoffer J Martin would you say that He fusion is a byproduct as some imagine linked to the theme mindset of this paper? We do not need to imagine such physics channeled or given us by some ancient aliens or done in a level of a priesthood of secrecy by humans gods among us who have the power. We have some choices as to how to influence the direction of the world. The next social gravity era, having to adjust to the post-economic era, can be a dynamic and peaceful place but it is not a necessary reality anymore than the present state of things persisting is necessary. The freedom to so choose also allows the concentration of power. If in our imaginations some process where aliens are among us what would you say to them? I would say "Are you talking to me?" as in the movie Taxi. Tesla like all prophets generate followers who sometimes get it wrong in the legend and do things in his name he never advocated nor said. This sorting out in the virtual world is also subject to such new physics laws- as wide at least as your vision of Regulus theory that encompasses wider intelligible geometric structures- but as technical as my comments here seem- the next era is simple to understand at least for a while and should be for the world soundly hopeful.
There is a difference in the need to know vs the want to know. In this climate of change (I mean we cannot authenticate the message but not the messenger nor the messenger but not the message- what is a leak and what is disinformation hedged to glean money from those who like a mass social movement taking on a life of its own? We need to better define what is information principle and not just where does it go in the black hole of secrecy.) if Tesla's papers were released no one would be able to understand or apply them as principles evidently.
* * *
Reply to my comment on Matti Pitkanen's blogspot this morning.