The God is Dead Particle

The God is Dead Particle

L. Edgar Otto        04 July, 2012

For those in the know the announcement today of the discovery of the Higgs boson, (reported as the God particle in terms the masses may better relate to in the local news)

it must come as somewhat of a let down despite some of us full of enthusiasm for the project and what was expected with some dramatic sense of honest assessment of experiments and no crossing of fundamental bridges for the next troll to bargain with such as the promise of a Linear collider.

If nothing else it should alert us to the need for taking a deeper look into the foundations of our physics and mathematics.  If experiments can be shown to be indecisive then surely this could be the case for our theories of everything and it does not matter who calls what expert person crackpot or who is not wise enough to be an expert in the enduring mysteries of ignorance is bliss and its leaders.

Now it is nice in a formal setting to declare victory in the achieving of objectives whatever the chance reason to start a war, war said to be obsolete as too costly in our day of the end of history or ideology,  war moreover that goes beyond the known restrains of economy to be an engine of indefinite length in the latter day reality of its continued sphere of influence.  No one knows really where to draw the needed lines to which actions are justified for the sake of all humanity. The power the pen will not do any better than the power of the sword.

MK said the Higgs discovery is an opening to possible new universes, the spark that ignited the one we are in.  Now a model has some evidence in its experimental confirmation and certainly Higgs himself remarks how gratifying to see such results in one's own lifetime.  But there are many lifetimes and experiences, and many are the army of engineers and theoreticians each with an equal reason and each independent without fame that among some institutions such as the awarding of the Nobel Prize to Einstein was as much a matter of prestige for the institution.  We forget sometimes the names of those who made significant advancement in theory that made his work possible, and yes a work that should be challenged if not surpassed by reasons of our fundamental ideas of what may be the actual nature of a god, such as one that ignited it all and walked away or set up some unique and universal laws in the landscape.

(Institutions, all of which on this sweltering day in my community I feel have failed the common man, discouraged anyone of merit, and for all its praise of our failed universities at best nourishes a fantasy world of anti-intellectualism as some idea of a right- the mandate for this veteran is what it is told in basic training- we are here to die.  Volunteering for reasons of patriotism is considered of low worth after wars and as if the state were God one better not swear to defend and protect the constitution against foreign and domestic enemies after the service- not if our decent veterans restrain from fighting their own people.  The foundations of the liberty and the constitution are dead, perhaps a future with reasonable certainty and meaningful citizenship.)

Just when and where did this first spark occur?  If the idea of multiverse and universe are not different concepts in a general theory of everything what does this mean for restricting the role of the standard particle (standard mass particle, SMP would be a better name).  All this appears to give us is some form of measurement in this world to which as an assumption it seems to cover most everything intelligibly in one universe (or perhaps a cyclic set of them).

It is a question of rotation and symmetry too, the turns that define identity in string theory- but if string theory cannot explain the thermodynamic symmetry then how can it explain anything about what makes up any sort of physical particle?

What is the source of this amplification or acceleration from the big bang regarding dark energy and so on? If there is a multiverse (and not perhaps a multiverse of them) how can there be a foundation for even the idea of spontaneous uncertainty arising let alone its settling to minimum states of vacua?

How can we state in such a world that (save by the assumption of reductionist measure as if we can have by self definitions a complete description sufficient for all logic) assumes the virtual world particles in a vacuum contribute to the Higgs or any other mass (that is mostly a sub virtual particle itself of top quarks) that these have no intelligible and not random vacuum structure?  The non linearity of an argument on this level of understanding is but a catch all and cop out explanation.  But it is hot and string theory is said to show there is not God (Hawkings) even though it cannot within itself understand heat-  God that's dead and it seems that we have reached the frontier of theory where we killed him as madman in thought at least we the cause of global warming.

Now, it seems that in a quasic world of 2^n continuum that with the projections we can double the area of a globe into a disc and so on until (at or near infinity) we find the lune or slice of the disc very small or even the radius of one such sphere.  An atom in the quasic grid as a count of even the 120 elements (there is still no bicentinuum 126 on this fanfare of a half hearted fireworks on the fourth of July.) that it may be reduced to several grids,  a sort of interquasic interaction is possible wherein all possibilities apply to the unique and specific and thermodynamic model of an element and the totality of elements up to the quasicity dimensions.  In which case is there a unique mapping along these lines, could there not be several for each local area of diversity in the landscape?  If the diameter is a sting (and via ampere in his grids and boundaries) then is a string not in a sense the entirety or reflection of a whole universe?  Or as a ray from the origin do we exclude this infinitesimal nothingness as a barrier?

Clearly we need to look again as so many physical laws that have evolved impressively but far from the equilibrium of the honesty as scientists in the creative foundations.

* * * * *

July 5    hmmm tantalizing excess of tau...  dark matter bridges, Lubos and TGD blog articles today... between the simplified 1 and 2^n continua in the illustration is a sort of wormhole full of bull fighters holding hands sometimes- of course there were matter bridges between galaxies known for some time, and I wonder if the excess is real in the tau thing?

Anyway, now what? But there is a lot to be done.  For me I am not sure the world is worth the saving or the education or the debate.  If the theoreticians are deluded the social workers and the ceo's must be downright retarded in their views.  Who rememebers the dodo's?

I would suggest a close alliance with the former Russia if this is to be a more modern century to come.  But either nation can work without the input of others because of cost or lack of human resources.  

Happy fourth of july and all that-  we cannot afford a grand finale where our mental universe ends with a whimper and not a bang as we reverse the god's truth in our social minds.  And this generation could have made a difference!

* * * * *

Incompressible Fluid Electroteleologics (Et)

Incompressible Fluid Electroteleologics (Et)

L. Edgar Otto   03 July, 2012

I imagine the frontier and foundational problems that carry over to our modern era from the awakening of the age of electrodynamics and its classical description, the unanswered questions left for future consideration for the sake of the utility of the bulk of the seeming totality of such a theory and for experimental observation, especially the question of monopoles and magnetic systems generally, come to a more modern resolution in theory and in evidence so far as to what we can claim with certainty from the experiments in our great colliders.

I find it quite possible that even the idea of quarks, or beyond that some thoughts of preons, these reduced to neutral particles point like or not has an alternative picture wherein the image or the physicality of the diaelectric meet in one philosophic question of existence or adjacency.  In particular this may apply from inside the flow of the bare monopoles in a circuit that as a velocity light speed is to be seen in the impossible separation in magnetic terms, not just electrostatic.  But only by the calculus can we justify the existence of the magnetic body yet it not shown an active carrier or cause of changes in the quasic generalization of space.

We imagine an atom in these alternative terms as the shells with capacitance or the membrane layers as if the mysterious sunspots in warps and swirls from some galvanic force of unknown nature in the classical physics.  I can quite imagine conceptually, if such conception can be described by a mathematical treatment of physics to some advanced nature that conception or mathematics come to correspond, that there are no quarks other than just as there are no electrons in the shell configuration model beyond the point with its approximate location (that a sort of classical but intimate uncertainty principle precursor) just as the epicycle idea itself too complicated a description of the planetary orbits thus an illusion more than a reductionist foundational system.  The same holds for the electrically neutral interior or volume of the nucleus by this extension of electrodynamics- a sort of hyper epicycle.

Yet what can be seen as a concrete particle is the geometrical sense of analogs into at least the next highest space of these warp sprial swirls as if sunspots, and these are to be interpreted as dipolar, or monopolar, or nilpolar of which we distinguish the "quarks" in combinations real or apparent or materialized in the adjacency of half images at the interface of what exists or not  (not just that complex analysis of mirrors).  By this I mean the nature of these n-poles (and 2^n-poles) determines the flavor and color laws we try to put into a standard theory.  Of what does this level of QCD balance against but the ideas of warps in n-poles.  

Clearly a nilpole is the balance against the greater dialectic of gravity and entropy at some point of universal cosmic description including real or false models of expansion and the differences given "infinite time" of the computation before the fact at these remote singularities of the polar endpoint images of the tertiary strings.  Quadrupoles are imagined but not in away that is new physics where the questions to ask are not clear in what we ask for such dimensional systems.

Such lack of clarity suggests a concept of electrochaos (as randomness) exists as well in that philosophic core trinity of which we find real physical consequences and observations as well as the electromechanics.  In general we tend to regard a negative sign as relatively ficticous to which that on the other side of a surface dialectic has not substance unless the real but unseen concrete body a one end of the spiral or helical wormhole eye can be subject to the informational and meaningful idea we imagine in the limitations found in nature and presumably number to which we can apply to the mathematical physics the metaphor of heat. 

As far as consciousness goes in this system our lives exist in climates like a solar cycle in great swirls and explosions where the bulk of the charges and energy is hidden and will remain so in its great vitality while existing or in the shadow echo of its existed to which for those in this season all left behind is a fossil or gravestone with names that no longer connect or mean more than a footnote of someone with out measure of influence in any multi-history. But in the real or false hope of such an idea of a lifebuoy or rope for the connection itself and not the fading legacy.

It is still meaningful to ask in the physical structures how permanent and unique such a consciousness and where does that information go (with great emphasis on the structure of the where to which perhaps science comes full circle in season to put back into mystery what it strove to unearth and and command but this time with clarity and understanding- not just our poles of emptiness or  reasonably certain but doubtful faith.

It is worth mentioning that in the evaluation of who among the theoreticians made the greatest contribution, those original or observed and collected synthetically, are still recorded but not taught as such in their interesting and wide lives of research and contemplation. 

* * * * * * *

Tertiary Thermodynamic Strings

Tertiary Thermodynamic Strings

L. Edgar Otto   02 July, 2012

A string conceived as a dimensionless structure containing useful information in the abstract can be imagined as a creative structure on higher levels that we can interpret as Pitkanen wormhole phenomenology.

In this deeper idea of an ideal sting of zero width we can carry over the idea of apply heat to the super subatomic structures to which it seems the idea applies on on the level of the chemistry of molecules.  Heat as such is a mathematical metaphor.

We imagine, IN CONSERVED SYSTEMS (in the sense that the idea of any conservation law must have exceptions and conservation of energy seems the last one standing) that the boundary of such an n-ary string is insulated from that outside it.

The idea is to apply the mathematics to the transfer of heat of which by the combining of complex and real values we have similarity with the wave equations via the distinguishing between quasifinite values by the calculus to which we make the advancement over Newton to Hamiltonian systems of the shifting of paths- what is reduced to a linearity in one system in the path appears as the shifting of a path generally to which we tend to define the disorder in terms of the coherence of systems as non-linearity.

Other assumptions are made from the more established laws of thermodynamics as the flow from hot to cold regions and the mapping of isothermals.  I propose in this sea of conflicting and changing terminology the term heterothermal for the more general physics with new symmetry operations.

The conveyance from one view to the other assumes that the information is conserved such that the modes of differentiation and what of the view is justified in discarding where the equations suggest it as intelligible to do so, while in fact this relationship is not necessarily foundational for there is freedom to interact beyond ideas of insulation over a span of time and general space.  Nor can we express entropy as related to time without the sacrifice of some of these less than foundational physics concepts.

The transfer of such shadow mass-energy imagined as directional (but more complicated than the effects or as causative states and grounding of symmetry breaking as the working hypothesis) may be that of branching possibilities such as Fibonacci trees, feathers, double explosions and so on at the unons of decisions or may be general forms we associate with spheres and discs and other harmonics, waves and warps (helices and spirals) and so on...

The helix in fact seems to apply to the organic world while it is also directional as an ideal mirror.  Of course the right and left of our evolved experience is still a little outside the intelligible use of our geometric and mathematical concepts to which the glimpse of such an idea seems refreshing thus certain as ones new understanding, a sense of advancement.

From a given unon center decision point of paths or the integration of all possible paths in the inter-dimensional and inter-groups span beyond absolute foundations we may imagine what is negative or not for at a decision point or complex of initial or final singularities the direction is not necessarily chosen from the intrinsic properties of decision only for the sign is arbitrary at that point- and yet not that we have sub particles that give us the sense of time but sub routines over the inter stereonometry of abstract structures.

Such an interpretation may lead to commensurable and intelligible subroutines of a more general concept of order and disorder as in the relation of an organ to the health of the totality of an organism.

* * * * *

In Which Direction Flows Centered Negative Entropy

In Which Direction Flows Centered Negative Entropy


L. Edgar Otto    1 July 2012

The above illustration is a mathematical game involving the patterns of the sums of digits of numbers or these taken literally and summed.  Unlike most Indo-European languages for the subtle idea of negation in the question and answers four way dialectic (that is a process of logic:  to find, to loose, to take, to give...for example) not only by word order (does this not show the innate idea of permutation structures such as the braiding of our sequences of words in the meaningfree and meaningless cases?) but Finnish uses the particle ko uniquely to express such linguistic differences.

But this is a game of sorts, the shadow atom or matter idea as I tried to express with the two small mushrooms in the grass  isolated as if a particle pair in a wide space and the color inversion.  It should be a caution that supports the claims of some of the more advanced in intelligence (if we believe MENSA) that we can find a mathematical theory of pattern for most anything we imagine, even in the informationless or information free ideas of haunting coincidences in numerology.  This is part of the task of clarity of a total system of ideas or a specific case for science as far as interpretation goes.  Now a lot of this can be the result of our influences in the evolving and state of culture of a language.  Indeed, part of the modern view suggests a great deal of theory is just its linguistic basis - but that is one side of the philosophy of science.

In the modality of being, that is of the Being, Doing-Making (homo faber) and Having of Sartre we should observe that in the English word 'do' we sometimes find it close to being like the 'particle' 'ko' in Finnish.  Such connector words to subordinate clauses are close to the mental foundations of language which certainly the evidence suggests colors our perceptions.  This is true of the actual use of our tense syntax compared to the ideal.  It seems more radically true in the structure of other languages such as Semitic in the cvcvc word structure as opposed to the acknowledging of right and left brain states of the consonants and vowels.  The god particle in a finite language can be the unspoken mystery implied and unseen even with a trinity of quarks.

I see that the TGD related commenters are coming closer to the sense of general theories.  I quite imagine that I must have the application of the theory inverted, that is when I add the entropy concepts they progressivly go down to lower levels.  Perhaps the analogs to the unity of the Planck value in Pitkanen's multisystem goes out from the lower levels or centers.  I had this same inversion with galatomic as far as the direction of time involved goes- and in both cases there seems to be a middle path of the applications.  But I have not gotten an answer yet from Pitkanen a to which points of theory we have missed of each other.

"It is not that one can be unholy, but that one is not holy..."  quote from a tract in the "Holiness Church"

* * * * *

M is for Monster Group Max Symmetry

L. Edgar Otto 01 July, 2012

The mind as quason from one nonnecessary dimension to another or alternatively our supercontinnum unon (or unity nonnecessary dimensioned particle from one intrinsic view) would suggest not only the field of consciousness as part of the general symmetrical structure of abstract space in rest and motion or return to the sign, but empty space of which there is room for higher spirits beyond materialist reduction (although the quasic model can be viewed as a reductionism to define dimension in its own right.) From the physical aspects of this as an organic entity it is most likely the higher connections and parallels of the levels of at least the orientation in the interactive enguagement with the center singularities of adjacent dimensions that among other things may define better what we mean by schizophrenia with physical evidence as if a chaos like magnetism as a totality system.

There is room for the reality or idea of the 'soul' while it is intelligible yet still a vague concept as is consciousness. But clearly in this model of room that we cannot in actuality say is filled or is empty the idea of what is real or external of 'possession' as well as shared sentience is closer to scientific intelligibility. In the generalized quasic and dimensioned developmental space a node of decision, the unon, is also that which is ambiguous or paradoxical in so far as the inertia of it all can be seen external, internal, or perhaps neutral and invisible as per our long time debates of such intelligible and creative intensions and intuitions.

* * * * *

Later that day:

It occurs to me that we should distinguish between dimensionless and dimensionfree constant numbers.  In effect I have to take seriously a range of entities beyond natural dimensions, beyond the transfinite transcendentals, in short that question of more in the idea of continuum to which we expand the concept of number in the number line and can find a sort of location of uniqueness for some point like location.  This goes beyond the default reduction of say surreal number concepts.  It involves unity, that beyond the idea of more or emptiness past the idea of dimensions even as abstract branes.  There is no reason to thing that in such numbers we cannot have quasifinite and teleoscoping patterns in the repitition or not of the digits after a decimal yet these shore up the general continuum and the nonnecessary connections between then isolated maximum symmetric group.   M is for monster and the monster sleeps in the center of the great labyrinth of our theories of numbers.
A good candidate for this sort of number I style "intelligible numbers" is Euler's constant.  In its special way it approaches unity in that we imagine an infinite sequence of factorials nth! which with its inverse progressively is such we can measure or even introduce the concept of a whole number and discard the ever smaller values after the decimal.  In some senses we abandon a rigid idea of ordinality also.  This goes beyond the quasic concept to one I have called as the generalization in conception ever recedes, the physics of the Omnium.  Such numbers are quasi but completely over the span of totalities this question of uniqueness in relation to prime number absolute or relative concepts and to the nature of the multiplicity or unity of such an arrived at dimensionless constant place.  These are quasi-indefinite values and may be as seemingly empty as replete in multiplicity.

To a great extent it relates as the Fibonacci related numbers such as the golden ratio of dimensionless unity or structural restraint of its sequences and powers.  This is most likely derived from considerations of the two common transcendental numbers, the natural base of logs and the number pi (pending some further investications).  That a continuum of a set of countible infinities or within one such as Euler's observation that there are as many integer squares of numbers as there are intergers these omnic considerations of the rates of growth have a certain dimensionless reality at its unity of foundations.  In the quasifinite plane of rectilinear numbers these superholes are cracks in the foundation leading to nothingness or repleteness of information over the color spectrum of all given absolute ideas of numbers.  This sort of idea if not the totality of the numbers up to the intelligible is needed to resolve and complete our intuitions of what is a continuum.

Such numbers appear to have adjacency to the lower ones that make the number line or can do so in the paradoxes of nonnecessity.  As such their vastness as if a greater level or aleph transfinite is greater still so the probability of finding such a point is zero or less than zero in its influences on the general development of the cosmic structructure of the omnium (that is the omnicontinuum as we deal with both the highly abstract and yet from  a universal influence or perspective the highly concrete).


* * * * *

Ideas Arising along the Journey

Ideas Arising along the Journey


L. Edgar Otto       July 2012

*Ultimately in the most general theory even in consideration of strurctures of surreal numbers, we cannot distingish between games that depend for the winner on the first move or initial conditions or those that have in the development and complexity an indeterminate outcome.

*In the resolution of the quasic dimensions of binary global context the nature of information is at least the generalization of Penrose's idea of quantanglement that generalizes in some aspects between such dimensions or particles as entanglement to an end or up to such an end state where it becomes as if one of instantaniety over an abstract and once established field of action at a distance.  But this is moderated by the intelligible laws of arithmetic and geometry applied in the omnium development itself over some nonnecessary or even the lesser case of the uncertainty principle of relaxed metalogic.

*From the computational view in this superquantanglement model we do not distinguish the idea of hard or polynomal time universal or existential considerations.  For it exists conceptually as a neutral or empty compromise that may sometimes actualize to set the solution to a unique structure in reality including our ideas of negative or complex images that arise everlastingly.

*The question of orientation by reflections as being a similarity or a difference in angles is determined by the complex solutions of pi in its transcendental finite node reflections these naturally numerically intelligible or by our stance from the inside or outside of our view at the frontier boundaries of an interdimensional system. We abstractly generalize the idea of a turing universal machine and the role of pi and phi in one equation (Ramanujan) that asks also at a projection end Omega space of infinity the sum of all games of "lard" as generalized golden section laws and those of irrationals in general, by which we do not ultimately distinguish the shifting processes of addition and multiplication logics as necessarily differnent in a process of computational view and measure.

*The quasic plane may have more than one fractal like patterns of the general higher dimensional aspects of number and for the 24 recently discovered patterns this applies literally to at least the Euclidean topological view and implies shadow lattices multiply and independently hidden.  We can solve some of this as if linear even if of a more general non linear idea of space in its interdimensional complexity.

*More than this may be even more foundational questions of structures of non-necessity and the unique unfolding creatively everlastingly or eternally as a steady state given or in the idea of cyclic models, both surpassed and in the subsequences, the multiply telescoping into isolation of subseries and cycles we can have intelligibly distinct such sequences but on this higher symmetry issue level.  These concepts benefit from the idea of quasized colour encoding notation.

*  *  *  *  *

*Just as we can have an array of which the symmetry although one directional, an arrow but is really two directional, we can have a bidirectional state of things that folds into a reduction into one direction such as the obvious first experiment in the quasic ordering of the periodic table.

*It is noteworthy that 89 and its shadow add up to 6 cubed plus one (in this count).  That is 27 x 8 plus one.  The experiment can have a three space representation with neutral directional holes (that is the 24 plus 3 of soma).  Successive binary substractions of 7140 leads to 121 or 100 squared as a remainder set.

*Of course this is but a first experiment as I expect a wider treatment to appear more pleasing and clear in the plane ordering into some dimensional representation in the interdimensions.  Now in a sense we can use the symbols for the elements as a code itself combining any two such as OsAu and try to examine its chemical properties as paths for general structures.  The quasic dimensions of the diagonal is equivalent to the magic square like arrangement in which such a matrix of the model can be interchanged conceptually and with the abstract motion information.

* * * * *

Quasic Interdimensional Reference Frames

Quasic Interdimensional Reference Frames

L. Edgar Otto
30 June, 2012

We can assume that any quasic fn motion function of an intelligible change of coordinates is independent of the dimensional basis it is in.  A rectilinear motion may be considered and acting through a space of any dimensions and a particle can obviously shift between quasic generations of various dimensions of space.

This can be regarded as a constant of the abstract motion function and may be assigned a unitary or limiting value such as the velocity of light.  Clearly, in terms of quasifinite wildcard coordinate information or the concept of force in the determination of mass or gravity, as in the centered mini black hole concepts of Rio Frio the foundational measure of light speed may vary in space, time, mass, energy and so on, that is in a general frame reference the speed may slow down.

This can be seen an intrinsic property of rectitude quite beside the idea of what is the relative measures of curvature.
Within a discrete and statistical compass of the interdimensional interactions the force assumed as a source into actuality or observation may appear as if from a greater dimension and as kinetic and potential are aspects of the same concept this gives the foundation for path duplication and multiples of such duplication.  It also sets the general value for the interdimensional game of life.

We assume that where there is mathematical intelligibility the laws of physics in the count reflect this intelligiblity in the main.  The universe can be thought to be not necessarily intelligible so we ground the idea of statistical influences. The concept of this general relation does not require strictly that in the actual paths, choices and birfurcations, enfoldings and symmetry breaking of string or brane like objects. That is, a string does not need an extra dimension to vibrate within and it usually called time for that is also an intrinsic null property of oscillation, yet on a general physical level is nevertrheless an intelligible description unto some dimension.

Thus we may regard some actual particle in its abstract motions within the ranges of absolute rest and unlimited moving to move without radical change in the coordinate basis yet this could be a model generalization within the compass of what seems a limited model- thus we intelligibly form a basis for the nature and roles so adjacent in this manner to the idea of transfinite number manifolds.

E = D^m x D^c = D^2 x mc more or less where c^n is reflective of its interdimensional rectilinear abstract function invariance.  D here for the idea of Difference.

In the TGD view the actuallity of a wormhole is intelligible acts as if it is a moving or still coordinate light speed velocity of which the speed can be hidden or dimensionaless, that is a neutral generalized quantum-like dark quantum manifold.

That the values here are powers of two we apply the general ideas of discrete computation such that the addition or substraction along the rectitude in a Turing like manner can result in the power and error correction codes (of so many concurent variables in the logic of a choice at the moment) and these also relate our idea of order and disorder as possibilities in the general space and that it can have directionality.  That we can in this positive space as the only rectitude (that is no negative distance, probability, or time realized as the general actuality) observe the time arrow. In the computation numbers represented by complex notations or the question of primes as in Mersenne (as Pitkanen observes in his system and the value of recondite quasic structures in my own) makes intelligible quasifinite deductions as if proofs by complexity resolved by infinite descent as one of the possible views.

* * * * *

Given this general model we see that the general quasic notation can be interpreted as parts of an algebra or a form of a ground for differentiation of which these can form in a relaxed nonnecessary intelligible way an arthimetical system and a geometry as well as that implied in the logic.

By colour I mean the added dimension of the generalized math of this algebra, a global, that is not just vertext method of computing groups and abstract structures and the relations between them if we distinguish ideas under the heading of generational phenomena quasic and standard as well a better definition of our terms information and dimension.  These uses of terms are close, parallel in meaning and not that far from our intuitive theoretical intuitions.

As such it becomes a useful form to explain particle decay paths in standard and quasic as well as general relativistic spaces up to the frontiers of our ideas on consciousness.  To consider such things is to sense the frontier and foundations of science itself even if we do so from vague lower models we impose upon such sensations, intutions, truths and deductions or even inductions to steamline the data from our great experiments- part of this being the threshold of self-replication or local vanishings itself.  Clearly there is more than one way to see supersymmetery, or to the abstract nature of arithmetic and geometry in dealing with information and higher spaces as well the applications in detail of groups.  Virtual particle concepts have legitimate foundations but these should be taken with the clarity of good theory.

Wildcards aside as well as the immersion into quantum ideas of uncertainty or any theory of physics that has an underlying determinism for its model will distinguish those coordinates which are zero to partly (that is without the tool of inversions and mirrors) from some decimal or arithmetic center and direction from it) define the base of the dimension of quasic colour.  So too for ideas of expansion as for example the conception of spherical waves or our ideas of false vacuum force and that of models of inflation.  In this take we imagine zero in its closed idea as non existence or impossible.  We imagine these, and one as possible and existing, as if a virtual or philosophic absolute (the relative and absolute are at bottom equivalent concepts) to which from any level of a theory of everything we can imagine going beyond it with vague or real computational and conceptual extensions such as p-adics or theories in general of the nature of ordinality.  Quasics gives us a portal into the possibility of such spaces and processes so as for measure.

The measure of a good frontier theory seems to be it is a stage adjacent to such abstract realms where all are a possibility as to as yet unlimited choices (diseases of thought and intuition can be that the model or the state of mind is logical but too rigid to see even the lesser generalities) that is that the truth of such a model is close to its own objective state ameliorated with doubt in the weighing of the model. It is as invisible from outside or approaching some angle as light that is not seen as light save by reflection on something.

We also justify the working idea , hypothesis, that we can distinuish the artificial from the natural, as in elements created to fill the periodic table or hints from structure in the common world language of organic chemistry to find new molecular sturctures and discover (invent them also) new properties.  In that language we clearly see that the heart of orgainic chemistry just as the dodecahedron is the hymn of Euclid to it so dedicated despite its paradoxes of irrationality and the finite global view as cosmology, that DNA in its hierachircal and diverse structure is the center of it as well its reliance on quantum grounding in all its counter reductionist diversity.   But these can be one intelligible unified theory.

We as sentient creatures are intimate to the descriptions and interpretations as well as have potential connection to understand artificial applications with our without a reasonable guess as to the unexpected consequences.  In the reaction to new theory and new doubts the sentient theoretician from whatever side of their stance on the philosophy of mathematics and science, satifactions or dispair of exploration in the poetic if epheremial comforts or challenges welcomed at the frontiers of creativity, simple merit and competence in pride of benevolent expertese to which we can expect others along the way to trust and depend on others of their own for cures and adivice as best we can advance on the periphery of our civilization.

I find it worth noting that whatever our theory or modeling by the mathematics the logic of it all can unravel when faced with cracks or anomalities at the frontier or the sense that we have reached the end of frontiers.  As to wether there are things beyond the totality despite our ideas science does have a certain objectivity, Nature herself seems so grounded while we exist, despite us, where it meets such an enquiring system of doubts and take from that the sense of belief as absolute and certain.  The reality of our creativity is that it everlastingly endures and resolves in each individual life no matter how long or short the existential balanance of a sort of equifinality.

But we can do better than justify our ideas on war or appeal that some things were meant to be or are determined soley by the gods or the state if we have a world safe for enquiry as all such color logics resolve its everlating singularities that feeds off the creative uniqueness of our universal totality and existential experience of the possibility of self, soul and spirit, if without the permission of the gods or with God's will we originally and fundamentally learn to think at times for ourselves.

This nonneccesary viewpoint is the paradox to which on the most rudimentary of levels of thinking we sense that what is the reversible or the irreversible space directions of time or its artificial clock nature in distinction to that of our subjective feelings is the first leap into new physics models and realities of which as if the establishment of an existential past, thus memory we build upon our science.

In the metaphor or poem on the SphereVirgin, above, as if the objects held were simple chess pieces (I suspect it is not helpful in learning the game to pay against the machines without the mythical human element and wide quasifinite possibilites of positions and moves) let us recall that she is woman, and also the fourth in my oeconomy of the Godhead before we reach the SphereDream as the fifth, the Omnium integration of a single soul walking an endless beach over time.  The fourth dimension as an idea was very fruitful for the awakening of our modern physics as the new discoveries at least as we scratch the surface by our colliders themselves the doubtful microscopes and telescopes to the next higher stage of the nonnecessary reality of particles and our world and our natures.  The LHC probes creative philosophy itself, tests our methods, in hardware and theory.

* * * * *
As a footnote to the concept of yesterday, the partial extension in directions of given dimensions that apply to the parallels of general quasicrystals involving the 4 space interpretations of the golden ratio and its laws- in my game of "butter" of such a structure analog of those proportions the one describe as square or made by such ratios, in three space we regard it as the game of "lard" and so on.

This suggests we need more investigation of primes and prime Fibonacci number concepts- intuitively at the frontier of at least electromagnetic electron configuration I see the element 89 as the gateway to the next and more general period and one that radiates, that is Actinium and its Series. I am wondering if I understand and in what sense by Pitkanen's methods we can project particles or atoms that exceed the multisheets of the Euclidean five membranes or that pushes the periodic table beyond these golden cycles that are intimate to ideas of unity itself that for the usual arguments we do not take as a prime number it being indeffinite. But would the LHC not see such a range of particles and its measure of their influences at least?  On the frontier the Higgs like objects are in the nonnecessary and perhaps not directly observable space.  Nothing forbids these not to be creative entities either outside the span of what seems the totality of our physical laws.

* * *

Thoughts on the Supercontinuum as the Number Line (Added Sunday July 1st 11:43 AM)


Beginning the month of July I thought I might start a separate blogspot with the sidebars to more readily link to those of which I try to understand and make comments on their work.  Last night for some reason seemed rather productive in my summation of thoughts.  This morning I slept on the nature of cardinality, the C continuum that is the question of the hypothesis as aleph1 cardinality and certainly 2^alph as a continuum.  I hold that the ides of choice is important here too as part of one theory along with the usual arithmetical axioms.

C is intuitively a rectitude for such reference frames and of course represents the transcendental numbers around that reference rectitude.  Where my principle of the equivalence of the main diagonal information of the matrix or it quasic form applies we have an abstract grounding of the reality of unon choice in the quasifinite span.  In a sense this grounds the idea of a string that also does not require a natural dimension to vibrate within, yet it does seem to ground the natural dimensions as Cantor had tried to do originally.


It is not hard to see that in this condensed aleph1 linearity that the transfinite numbers span all the natural dimensions and within the string of no width resides the ideas of the brane as that which is greater than the number of curves in a plane informationally.


I see that Lubos has some discussion on this sort of thinking today- I have to read  more that a first glance but the general idea seem obvious.  Theoreticians must finally be trying to address these philosophic implications.  The idea of a continuum of which the higher transfinites overshadow to almost non existence the lower ones as if at a "point" we find a hole in the continuum,  well, in that hole are further concepts of holes of higher cardinality and the issue is again of what stance do we take for the sum of all such or the last of such infinities?


But would it not be nice to establish at the foundations a good grounding for the idea of such strings and branes and the resolution of such quasifinite paradoxes of existence and singularities?  


* * * * *