Saturday, January 22, 2011
I find it a strange concept to imagine in an endless multiverse of ever evolving and ever expanding irreversible complexity that in the sum total, the Omnium, that the laws of nature can be seen as reversible and symmetrical after all.
But how would we exist given a reality of all possible existences, even unrestrained, otherwise?
What have we done with our wisdom, that second philosophy of Descartes, science, that in solving, bringing to light hidden mysteries as a tradition long influential from ancient Greece? We sometimes, going so far, apply it with less than complete knowledge and resolve that we take our chances, cost benefits of expediency.
The dogma and philosophy and how far we've come! in our mapping of our own chemistry, of drugs, imbalances said the be all of our mind, claims this our modern identity, wise husbandry of life's sense of survival dominate in the main, reinforcing and nullifying our addictions.
How can he in the stupor of narcotics and spirits hope to awaken to wisdom from such confusions? To that, the slave of anodynes replies: "If you have not experienced these states of mind you cannot know of what you speak." The entitlement to the growing constituency thus a self-fulfilling prophesy while those who truly need and would be helped by medications go without it, slip through the cracks.
But here, my children, I speak in examples and parables. For it is not about who evolves to become the monkey on their backs- what is one life more or less in the billions even if our frame of mind and sacrifices in war sees no more millions perish?
It is about a problem in physics. Cosmological imbalances. I offer the metaphor to hold up an answer in a mirror. In the creative state of mind we can think about and talk about our intuitions, soberly, of the frontiers and the still unknowns.
This a long and exhausting journey to mountaintops. Reaching there the path appears ridiculously simple. The idea I ponder tonight come from a terse remark on the blog by Kea - who most certainly understands the intuitive aspects of the game: "There are many ways to find the number 56."
Although I cannot say how this problem arose in other researchers, I find parallels in my own modest meditations. 56 or 57 dimensions I have read applies to some real space representations akin to the 240 + 8 dimensions of maximum symmetry, involving I imagine, complex number considerations. My concept I called "Quason" mostly eight dimensional. But how is it many workers too years to enumerate this recent discovery? I know our work is not finished.
So, Arise, my child of Earth! Listen and seek, ride and dance in the light, wide the world for the work and rewards of tomorrow's wisdom.
* * *
In the ennead, a thing of informational color code, we find 56 changes of the 1's and 0's of their coordinate designations. We also see that there are 6 other elements (15 a key four space number) 28 in the extended Conway matrix has many ways to label the duality colors (I should try to enumerate them in a global unified picture.) A key to this is the upper right to lower left diagonal of the quasic grid and dimensions (the duality diagonal I now style it).
But these enneads involve trialities (and so too the original idea of strings, partons, QCD etc.) Yet because of this, when extended into a 3x3x3 representation we find that the quasic motions between these duplicated backdoor gin labels (ie orange, green, violet BDKGIN) it suggests a concept that we cannot privilege one view in the usual quantum associative and averaging manner - nor can we narrow the search by labels to a unique case- even if in the linear algebra we start as some vertex. We have, in the limitations of triality, a "quasi-privileged" freedom as a more general and fundamental concept. (But of the quasic abstract motion numbers corresponding to the informational coordinate ones, I have seen no pattern yet.)
* * *