Quasifinite Peculation Diffusion in Dimensional Natural Aleph Models
L. Edgar Otto 31 July, 2013
23:34:21
The quasic grid as an
n-dimensional n-symmetric plane or brane can be imagined as two space. Our
concepts of structural conformality can have abstract interpretations, the
laying down of principles such as what seems to emerge from information
contained if we represent this plane in three space. The idea of mass or gravity being a
relativistic illusion of the angles involved where geometry is non-Euclidean is
such an idea that we restrict in terms of what is the continuous or the
discrete where these loosely meet between these 1 or 0 extremes as contiguity
thus issues of proximity of unified focus and grounding for entanglement over
non-locality.
I offer a photograph
of a random chunk of glass against the reference grid of a window screen to
show variations in how we see the grid broken into its three space connections
if reduced again to a 2D photo. This
variation of intrinsic curvature, or of what in the transfinite count is such a
difference is what makes the usual methods of analogy to fluids and so on fit
what we accept or perceive in natural physics.
We generalize the intrinsic curvature as force that covers a wider
landscape of what is possible in cosmology for a natural philosophy (physics of
the corpuscular discrete or wave like continuity).
Thus we organize our
world quasifinitely by a better definition of dimensions, by n finite object
content, and the ideas of general continuum transfinite theory (that is the DNA
notation). Does this not suggest the issues
of a multiverse and our stances toward it?
Does it not beg for questions of depth of assumptions as to the so
called fine tuning of a unified universe?
Surely, this makes things a little clearer despite the complexity of
which we know seems the choice of nature.
In these models we
surely have wider and corresponding connections of depth between general
theories which we accept or not as we do higher dimensions, superstrings,
surreal numbers, p-adics, higher modular numbers and so on...
If we imagine some
power of ten in the 500's as points of singularity where continuity may be
erected upon continuity as division intelligibly is restricted by contiguous
hierarchies of numbers...can we not say a diffuse grid of them contained at
that value would be a p-adic map of the string landscape?
Proximity of
positions diffuse and transitive over a grid or landscape, quasi-independent of
congruency and definite measures, Archemedian in the meshing, shows that Nature
can restrict intelligibly the properties applied as if numbers, that of itself
in its working, and beyond the partial concepts of matrix values as described
by rotations or exponentiation and simple ways of apply the ideas of
differentiation to some physical asymptotic limits or horizons, suggests that
nature can have weights of privilege in its expressed properties. This would suggest that in the small ranges
over the infinite the universe itself is stable while the rare possibility can
exist that at some time or place its unity can unravel into more general
principles than in our time and place we so specify.
* * * *
The question of why
the universe exists rather than not, that it achieves the widest possible
complexity in the design and in our imaginations, that it exists more as
quasi-finite thus everlasting rather than eternal, remains ultimately the issue
of quasi-proof astronomically for or against in the fine tuning idea we
encounter in science as well as philosophy. In the sense of our desire or
wonder to so ask this question as our understand evolves, we part of this
design as a quasi-creative and quasi-finite universe we ask of our unique
experiences as well of the uniqueness of the universe.
* * *
In the photo of the
smoke and rings, distinct particulates, we could have moving tori... and we can
still ask why of hot fusion containment such structures in the quantum like
logic of advanced development of its postulates between existence and shadows,
what is the ground for plasma pinching?
Perhaps we need a wider idea of chaos and turbulence as well as what
their is, or at least to connect it to our quantum grounding.
* *
No comments:
Post a Comment