Pteron Structural Symmetry Concepts
(Majorana Magic Color Pterons in 1/2 Qm 3D)
L. Edgar Otto 14 April, 2012
The leap to higher symmetry, even in the reduced form is as difficult a leap as that into higher dimensions, or as a jump and intuitive gamble. But this is part of the natural process of our consciousness and reason where in the sequence or series of some things (it is not exactly a steep learning curve for evidently some such mountains cannot ever be reached in some senses where our edifices can only lead to accidental but real conceptual rises and falls.)
For in the order, the abstract motions and contexts of insight we break these symmetries of conception that the simplicity while explaining things loops and precipitates in a sort of isolation that breaks from the perceived general order of things. Likewise, on a more intelligible path of physical effects and generalizations we break out of the loops as if a leap of faith to return again into the teleoscoping mainstream.
Our debates, assuming we are not that different in our views of the universe, in our self reflections somewhere undistinguished as our own antiparticles that obey some concept of congruency with the mathematical methods is part of this interplay between the simple and the complicated in ourselves and in dialog with others.
But once we reach out into awakenings lesser barriers to our exchange and signals of dialog, such as our spoken and written languages or symbol systems in the various sciences are closer to mathematics and organic chemistry notations as what we can travel in retrospect of our human achievements as a universal language.
This is of course a transitional condition with no guarantees even if an individual or group of them set out on a quest of enquirey and as always the state of the world can discourage or lay the seeds for such prospects of enlightenment and benevolent technologies.
I think lately of what if in history if my thoughts are worth something to future generations- how modest the simplicity of any guru whom we emulate or follow into the abyss on the inheritance of no one special in the flow that is the challenge of maximum diversity- a logical and political paradox itself in that anything subjective and objective as indistinguishable can be called a true faith in philosophy or science.
But does it matter then how in an unlikely place we know or not the history of unlikely individuals even forgotten the list of them there for the prestige and formality only some new nuance on civilization, the photos of great men and women shown after all to be mere shadows in the fragile beginnings where a new world sets up as equal and independent the minor theorists and engineers in the pragmatism of the politics of the time that our musicians and philosophers, inventors and innovators, were there first or are as good as anyone in the business of cold war behind the scenes.
But such seeing myself as others might see me is not a thought I dwell long in for we were once a pragmatic people and will be so again. Still it has given me new ideas to pursue and new resolution and awareness of others if not new understanding, new jettisoning of the vast false goal that would be dead ends were it not we locked into the search more than the goals.
There is endless speculation as to whom in history traveled where and learn what a sort of reverse of prophets not loved in their own country. So why did this strange life of circumstances happen and would this be how I would live it again. Perhaps with those throughout history who find the razor that suggests the simple explanation is the best- God as the creator not a bad hypothesis by that standard yet also the potentially most complex.
We do the work of God, yet we are not gods in that sense- but even the Christ thought about cups of circumstance and human doubts if we read that passage right and imagine an answer of the nevertheless Thy Will.
I mean, to explain myself to myself at the frontier of my experience and despite rejection by the example of those who sleep or live without wisdom the idea that it is God that has guided me is about as good an explanation as there is for our time anyway. I would say that whatever this is in us on some level of the ultimate, be it just the awe of the cosmos or the rare moments of joy witnessing childbirth is in our faculties a great achievement of human intellect to which those of lesser vision are content to walk parallel to the unseen hand and that is not forbidden yet if there is such a spirit our best imaginations pale in complexity beyond this world He would not tolerate what we do to each other in His name. It may be that simple.
Yet, the humanity I witness in my own earthly father was an example not explicitly said and as children dream or imagine they are forbidden to know higher things I ask him would God get mad- and his simple words back, as we perhaps often speak to our children when we perceive our parents as all powerful and wise gods he said "If God did not want us to know things He would not have given us brains."
It is no charge against anyone who stumble in their first impressions and beliefs from such sources in life for what humans do not know we cannot hold them to have given us a lie. Inside us all, and even toward the end of our allotted earthly time we each have to make this struggle on the ongoing frontier and listen or not to what we take as fore-granted as the air, even after things cannot be changed in the tragic loss of love or cosmologies turned on end with short lived sentimental poetry and crying out in pain, that we did listen to our intuitions, maintained our intellect, and lived simple and stable lives free for just the living where there is no question of apology for our instincts but that is the blessing and disease of beauty and truth and love to which the great complexity of the flow of things draws us into loops back to the night again as we do in reality the blasphemy and unpardonable crime of self deception against the world itself then expect others to do likewise.
Let the monkeys mimic do as Simon says as we hopscotch on one leg- three millenia of zombies is too much for a civilization to bear. Too much of our grasp of the world in our simple and ergonomic counting depends on ten fingers or that between our parents and children we cannot count beyond three although numbers in words and symbols are among the most stable of our shared or borrowed languages.
It is far better to be in technology obsolete than not to know one is or think they are while the world is the thing crumbling. But I should end this epistle for while I am not repeating myself I have not broken through to new and wonderful things that surpasses the entropy of our dreams - not in terms that we share directly anyway. So know that I did cherish so many of you and if it comforts you say of such a life that he did so many things we have not the scope to record in verse- know too that so did we all.
* * * *
Define "second".
ReplyDeleteOne should perhaps study geometry when young as a model for clear and true analogical reasoning. What calculation is too difficult of which you write? Is not the subject of geometry not covered at all beyond its axioms of what we already seem to agree upon- such a point or line or anything built on such notions that we can say is unique?
It is also true that mathematics is a faith and unlike other faiths can prove it is based on faith.
So what if we can use DNA to solve things as if a supercomputer in a drop of water if in the logic within it there is a wider conception of the physics and cosmos... progress? Well, if calculation is that complex and many layered certainly it is potentially there and active in one's mind- not reduced to some water drop from the vague outside view of matter. If you do not see it from the start how can you understand it- or worse as so many look for the same ultimately simple thing they have no idea where the problem is in closed or open universes or minds or that at the frontier of science we may have to face a limitation to our ultimate knowing.
So nolin, what do you want?