## Friday, November 19, 2010

### OMNIUM Prime

OMNIUM Prime An Intuitionist Theory of Everything?

Well, asking myself a child-like question I think I have a child-like answer of which we are all looking, sometimes childishly about what is happening somewhere on the frontiers of the strings and dimensions. I call this an intuitionist view if I understand the term correctly because it deals only with the integers.

It turns out that I may not need to have a model of say octonians as rotations in my hand to understand such. My first attempts did indeed seem a putting together of inversions of objects which reminds me of the 3+1 formalism of Rowland which combines complex numbers labeled distinctly- Dirac and all.

In this "intelligible" low prime discontinuities our Platonic and discovered notions always encounter haunting similarities, neither way alone close to true realization of our intuitions.

(But what nation or people can afford to waste genius and leave them homeless and starving? If merit and competence are not to be interpreted liberally then the idea of efficiency as a fascist word arises to keep the order as the pendulum swings and leaves civilization wondering how it can happen- a question asked by both sides as the authors of provocation.)

In the above illustration is an example of the quasic grid (a way of ordering the plane elements that clearly shows some logical relations) of the 24 units of the algebra. These can be embedded in 64 or 256 or as here even 1024 space. If 24 is the valid ones and that is the rigid rotations of cube, the where do we set up the 192 valid ones in the next quasic level of space? How do we rotate things back to some identity element?

The answer to this was inspired by Ulla's perpendicularity applied to her recent posts- not sure if these are her ideas alone- but the idea of a shadow of elements in the periodic table. Recent work seems to suggest these as a few atoms of anti-matter (and Lubos it is not clear to me antimatter needs be attractive and not repulsive- like so many ideas of handedness that seems confused and arbitrary.)

So let us start with some simple representations (making perhaps an arbitrary choice of labels):

*1 Imagine a cube with four colors dividing each face into 4 for the 24 orientations of the faces for rigid rotation. In effect three colors of the edges are at right angles to each other.

*2 Label these with the operations of the 24 group, i rho tau alpha.

*3 Note that an inversion across all dimensions still results in 24 squares of four (the surface) colors.

*4 Two such cubes can be twisted and compared such as to be equivalent to a table of the operations as if to make the computations of the permutations in the group.

*5 We note that similar dice can do this job if we use the dodecahedron of 120 operations- that is ten times the edges.

*6 Presumably in a square we have 4 surface colors, in a cube have to deal with six, and in a gamma-4 or hypercuble there are 8.

*7 This amounts to a doubling (as well we can imagine imaginary duplication of elements or operations) of the quasic grid- in this case 512 and 512 pixels the aim of which is to combine 48 or 24 such valid pixel vectors into an integrated overview to reach the 192 (or double this for all the 384 of the hypercube rotations. And with considerations of information as binary content find the appropriate quasic dimensions to so fit the description. How far can this go into the dimensions? What do we mean by this question?

*8 I distinguish now between the Unified Field and the Unitary Field, the terms formerly interchangeable.

*9 I can imagine now that in topological structures there may not be a distinct Platonic arrangement of elements that distinguish the nucleus from the electron configuration of atoms- at least this seems to be the case where all forces are thought to be of one common origin. But experimentally this is apparently not the whole picture.

*10 We now extend the idea of a labeled and colored orthogon on a four base system to call the material atoms K L M N and ultimately in 4space matter the shadow or mirror atoms (see Ulla's post) O P Q R each with the two bit code 00=K=mirrorK=O.

*11 A system of prime numbers in an even quasized dimension if only one way an even number can be factored into primes (and as far as we know only integers 4 6 8 and 12 are unique this way) the discontinuity is contained.

*12 But as in the case of 10 there are two ways to represent it as primes- that is 3 and 7 or 5 and 5. Thus the 3+1 formalism or the 2+2 formalism are both possibilities that may apply to a designed theory.

*13 The question of unity, or 1 (unified or unitary) defined as a prime may open up a whole can of wormholes or stings. In fact they seem to state the rules of symmetry breaking in the idea of compactification of dimensions in string theory.

*14 Clearly 2 cubed represent the pair of cubes (plinth theory) in surface space of the four dimensions. A plinth for technical reasons (as say with the gluon matrix) is a left over 1 or unity. We can add two things in the formalism as they may be real or imaginary in applied interpretations. Two significant numbers the occur:

23 = 2^3 + 2^3 + 1^3 + 1^3 + 1^3 + 1^3 + 1^3 + 1^3 + 1^3 which we can regard as 7 unity dimensions and three or four space- that is 9 or a triplication of 3 dimensional units.

*15 Now the other number that can be represented in this 9 quasi-quasic dimensionality is 239 = 5^3 + 3^3 + 3^3 + 3^3 + 2^3 + 2^3 + 2^3 + 2^3 + 1^3.

*16 These two integers, 24 and 240 (when we add 1) represent real structures, the 240 being the close packing number of 8 dimensional spheres around a central one.

*17 12 is part of 16 in the 3+1 formalism, just as 48 part of 64...

*18 Again, in dealing with the rotations of a 5D cube we have 3840 a factor of ten and also that factor of ten fold symmetry that determines periodic Fibonacci number ending digits beginning with every 11.

*19 Ten structures inscribed in a icosadodecahedron reduced and divided (actually beyond the natural integers as a metalanguage of the prime continuum- a uniqueness and division arithmetic) have shadows around some presumed center or shifting center. The permutations over any quasic state level preserve the shifting between the actual or perceived "generations".

*20 We note that the space representation of the 24 elements and 24 mirror elements of this intuitionist arrayed grid form topologically Lord Kelvin's solid which seems the surface on which the electrons or charge flows in a wire. Not also that for a honeycomb of such solids as space filling- this truncated octahedron to serve such function is not a perfect shadow as it may need to deviate faces slightly from flat.

* * *

Today I touched base with Kris: before I posted these thoughts. Because of his keen intuitive insights I asked to make sense of this:

Exchange on Facebook msgs:

Kristoffer J Martin

I'm getting strange outcomes for an equation I'm working on to determine the amount of energy to travel at C in a warp field of 7 dimensional space based on my Regulus space.

base equation.

WE=(a(Q*f(d)))*(Cp-Cm)^2*(Mp-Mm)

where WE=Warp Energy

a=area of effect

Q=quantum limit

f(d)=frequency of dimensions

Cp=normalized C (speed of light)

Cm=Quantized C

Mp=normalized mass

Mm=quantized mass

treating Q as ((ħ = h/2π))

Base calculation is then described for 1 cubic meter of space effected to move 1 kg of mass.

WE=(1meter^(3)*(ħ/7))*(C-(C*(ħ))*(1kg-(1kg*(ħ))

Its giving me 1.35400246*10^-18 m^7 kg^2/s^3

does this make any sense to you?

L. Edgar Otto

Wow, I am not usually into measurement- hard to read my and other standard stuff of bloggers on my peslablogspot. But today's post does say regulus space make sense in the counting of things- I will have to try to work on this, glad you are. Not sure how you mean 7 dimensions. that is a good one like 8 as a sort of limit Octonians and is sort of loop qm gravity stuff if I read it right. We could continue this on the pesblogspot. Certainly density of some sort applies- and our ideas of dark matter-energy.

Kristoffer J Martin Well 7 dimensions: 4 physical, 1 standard time, 1 super time, 1 exo (ie the final pov to observe the 6 dimensions)~ relatively speaking reference to the need of 7 points of reference to find any point exactly in space. Its the same number of base dimensions decompressed in Regulus Space.

Also we need to look at Spacial Tension and Energy Transference. I think I've figured out the problem with Warp Drives as currently viewed. Warp Drives don't force an object forward through thrust or a push force, it pulls it forward like wind moving from high pressure to low pressure.

L. Edgar Otto

not much thought on it yet but clearly there are two times, at least the real and the complex- but I am still trying to understand what I am reading on this. I tried a little in my peslablogspot today. Dimension and time are hard concepts. But your space is still part of my greater understanding of the universe.

Today

[You]

9:28am

you there?

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:29am

yep wassup

[You]

9:29am

just getting more ideas and some seem to relate to you recent msg on dimensions and so on- but it is a strange and simple view

what do you mean by what happens as 7D?

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:30am

I'm working on the premise that there are 7 dimensions

which is what I reduced String Theory dimension down to in Regulus space

[You]

9:30am

you have some sound intuitions- lately the highest academic guys are leaning to new areas

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:31am

I suppose if I calculate with super relative dimension it'd be 21 dimensions

[You]

9:31am

7 hidden 3 or 4 overt but 11 or 12 euclidean for the 4 or 5 relativistic, as I understand it

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:31am

far more simple than that

[You]

9:32am

I think you are encountering deep number ideas of which they do not fully understand in the string theories

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:32am

4 physical dimensions, 1 macro relative dimension of time, 1 super relative dimension of time and one exodimension

[You]

9:32am

Einstein said never make a theory more simple than needed- I feel that is what they did

there are certainly more than one sort of time because there is more than one sort of unity or number 1

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:33am

well I'm presuming all numbers are universal

[You]

9:33am

-1 +1 and lateral one or i

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:33am

based off of set theory

[You]

9:33am

good philosophic and mathematically grounded thoughts

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:33am

ie: []:i/[]:i

[You]

9:34am

but I am caught between the limitations of integers and of set theory- so are they

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:34am

I'm not

don't see why any one would be

[You]

9:34am

ie: []:i/[]:i

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:34am

but thats not just one

[You]

9:35am

true but no one can understand you and many think they have the theory of everything in their own private ideas

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:35am

well no one ever does understand me

[You]

9:35am

guess I just wanted you to know that there is still substance in our contemplations

set theory contains its own self referential uncertainty

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:35am

well the problem is is that at 7 dimensions I'm getting an amount of energy that is minute

the only uncertainty in set theory is the type of infinite

[You]

9:36am

damn, I wish I could follow more exactly

yes the problem is between the finite and infinite

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:36am

there's no difference between finite and infinite

when compared to nothing

[You]

9:37am

philosophic statement- but then it is all founded on definitions and some metaphysics like what is = muon what is not -everything else

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:37am

well

[You]

9:37am

otherwise 0 and potential infinityOo are the same

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:37am

I'm being far more literal than philosophical here

and who says they're not

[You]

9:38am

I understand that- they will not

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:38am

still I'm getting odd numbers

[You]

9:38am

all their group theory is infinite continuos groups some of mine is the finite quasicontinuous or discontinuous groups

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:38am

I was predicting something of the order of maybe 1/10 the amount of energy that special relativity predicts for an object of mass to move at the speed of light

[You]

9:38am

prime numbers are the halmark of discontinuity

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:39am

but instead I'm getting less than 1/100000000

[You]

9:39am

theory and observation: inside quasars light travels at warp ten

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:39am

oi...well i've got to get back to writing

[You]

9:39am

what is energy density?

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:40am

force

[You]

9:40am

how does gravity fit into this

ahhh fordce

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:40am

i'm treating gravity and time as the same thing

at the quantum level

[You]

9:40am

ok well, one day it is worth we still looking at this occasionally what are you writing?

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:40am

homework

and I'll leave it at that

[You]

9:40am

time-gravity yes sounds good

hey last harry potter movie!

she is hot in the interviews

[Kristoffer J Martin]

9:41am

last two harry potter movies

[You]

9:41am

ok but back to homework thanks and hail regulus!

* * *

Note: in an earlier chat I recall mentioning Rime of the Ancient Mariner where the wind opens from in front and closes from behind- somewhat suggestive of the ways one might exceed light velocity by some sort of compression of space a few scientists speculate upon.

Kris is an avid fan of Dr. Who. On philosophychatforum we in a long time collaboration developed his Regulus space (which is a sort of exxene as I called it super relativity and is also an intuitive duplication in the abstract of points and other geometric constructs. He has an interesting to draw some of which the methods got the right picture for some of my more obscure questions. Creativity indeed from this Creative writer in school now in Wales. (rim and flange ideas compared)

* * *

Ulla and the natural numbers beyond the mystical and mechanistic oddness and evenness (that is the line without either perpendicular or parallel)... and at these foundations there may be a fifth accounting on the tally sticks of physics, that the omnium as a more human theory of everything, yes with its warts and all.

The natural numbers on the face of it, the aleph 0 of points transfinite- on these we then turn our analysis to the questions on the nature of prime numbers- thus the idea of them as Godel's metalanguage goes beyond really our intuitive counting regardless of the relative negativity or complex lateral direction of the roots of unity. Arithmetic, number theory, even the mysticism for patterns and of numbers as to their reasons why someone imagined it that way- makes more sense. I do not assert an ultimate theory of everything, Ulla; but certainly consciousness is a sufficiently enough complex system to bring a bit of unity to it all. Our topological stance as primary for me starts with the dimensionful totality of things like E8 you mention in comment to one of my previous posts- not just an accumulation of materialized dust as in the core of crystal stars or in the LHC that may house a few of the simple anti-atoms- how is it so many cannot see the beauty in these pictures all around us? The color of your soul adds a dimension beyond this to all given in our experience and life. And in God's synaethesia He hears our songs as we were so privileged to hear in this era the first of dawning light reaches us- the likes of our dedicated and unsung theoreticians.

I took in a vet today- and the television had the service officer, a historian, of the so called "greatest generation" of dying off old WW2 vets who wants videos and other memorabilia the congressman Kind started ten years ago. They listen better when we defend others- but what do they want of any generation and the greatest is yet to come I believe? I suppose, and Matti commented on his retirement- what is the point now- that the veterans who freely serve and hold peace greater than war for the services of science- lost paperwork, on the streets to be forgotten- a fake sense of history- memorials not jobs, meaning of carved names in granite crumbling? They know not what they do, philosophers. Nor how our dreams are made such that the dice of wisdom are such a gamble in the hearts of all who pass by and leave in their vanishing to this great enterprise and sacrifices for personal gain and all too precious our family- vanished all the silent desperation. May we one day climb up from the sea and find the starlight! And all rejoice beholding it and feeling it and being it echos of lightning bolts around the earth's stratosphere know what best we need to share is that we shared it. We saw the equations in the sand between the tides and felt justly proud we were human.

* * *

Perhaps this I just posted on facebook conveys some of the idea of our identities and roles in the world- maybe out there in some five space or beyond, the geshalt after the music or near its end that addresses the absurdity in life and consciousness and how we achieve or are thwarted in the smaller view of our hearts desire. Each soul in some totality of everything, our individual consciousness a discontinuity, is a number as a multiverse. Also I address sultan on the nature of how statuses are read on fb, you always an ambiguous word these days- and of the idea of Abraham and sacrifice in this season of family and holiday.

L. Edgar Otto

Sometimes I think of your mom as your step mom. In the real world, apparently, we are all orphans. But was it not said we are in the world but not of the world? A great adventure it can be to be a stranger in a strange land- Only God can load he dice and walk away, I did not do that- after trials and sacrifice the Lord does not return to Job some strangers- willing ones still young enough to see true faith.

* * *

Before I leave I would like to comment (but not on his page) Lubos last article on what grand unification can and cannot do. Not a bad summary really, but his conclusions which should certainly disturb him if he reads my postings as coming out so close - how did I do this? Certainly not by saying that anyone who makes claims for grand unification say be E8xE8 (and because of no complex spinors?) is a HACK who does not understand how the groups work nor the need for the vague idea of supersymmetry of which after reading the summary we arrive at only speculation as to what this grand unification may be.

From my view, considering the aspects of a finite and workable positive group theory, I suggest that the young theoretician (who may one day make a great one or if he applies such a stance to discipline a fine engineer) does not understand arithmetic! How can someone know such complicated language and equations and miss the simple picture? One day we need to surpass our long line of mentors with their own agenda on how physics should or should not evolve- high praise hyped but the fading into what will be shown an error with aspects even die hard crackpots will still cling to as a faith- passes away quietly in the back pages in the history of struggle in enquiry.

* * *

Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

## No comments:

## Post a Comment