Lampions II : Music of the Multiverse

Lampions II : Music of the Multiverse

Before I begin I note that both Lubos and Matti Pitkanen have interesting articles worthy of my comment. I will be back shortly. The Lampions for today will be most general and were not inspired from reading nor dreams, at least directly. These are abstract or even metaphysical observations and questions that seem to me in the background of our debates. Does the cosmology determine the physics or the physics of say particles the cosmology- I have a view of both and from a philosophical viewpoint call it dork-stork space to answer some general questions. (forgive the terminology I use for now, the stork part come from Conway's birthing order from the Null. We simply have to come to grips with the general application of what in our day are digital and analog considerations applied to many sides of an issue.

* * *

Lampion 12-20-10A

The Law of Omnium - (Potential) Infinity x zero = One. Or any unity has finite and infinite aspects. This core inductive law once considered too metaphysical a basis for the calculus.

Lampion 12-20-10B

Null is in some sense identical to Infinity; one in some sense is identical to one; zero to one likewise identical to infinity to one.

Lampion 12-20-10C

Zero and a successor is a direction (dork dimension) for counting, when it is absolute zero (ultimate infinite omega) this is the principle of abstraction which may in some contexts be considered in both mental and physical senses, a metaphysical
principle. In the deeper abstraction of null as a void (double zero) the hyper-surreal calculus may see even the transcendentals and transfinites as rational.


Lampion 12-20-10D The dorkiness or storkiness of some general space may interchange the curves or flatness of geometries before and after unity to some remote direction, as well interchange the sense of what is continuous or discrete.

Lampion 12-20-10E When unity is equivalent to unity there exists a difference between a singularity and the classical shell of some spatial region or matter complex in which we can distinguish different quasi-fundamental new "forces". This structure applies both dorkily and storkily to a general dorkstork space.

Lampion 12-20-10F In dork space each point can be a naked singularity at any point in the space and time continua. On such a point (Conway) we can erect a whole linear continuum)


Lampion 12-20-10G In stork space we can have a fractal like recursive and iterative abstract space (my quasic space) which varies the scale both linearly and non-linearly where the uniqueness of the universe is intelligible by dimensionless constants in measure and dimension free topologies in general.

Lampion 12-20-10H Such a quasicontinuum organization of space, real and abstract, is hyper-recondite (that is based on the different powers of two in some state region or scale, recondite systems theory named after Fermats remark on the lowest level of these numeber theoretical mysteries)

Lampion 12-20-10I I can imagine two points or singularities in such a space or spaces wherein we can measure the distance between them (the symbol being a script Q^n and as there is no essential difference in the oddness and evenness of dimensionless structures -Q^n or iQ^n are conceivable too.

Lampion 12-20-10J In hyper-recondite numbers we can adjust the measure of quasic pixel regions in bits to interpretations as if 5/2 or 2and1/2 "wobble hypothesis" codon bases.


Lampion 12-20-10K Q^n also applies to states of mind, especially over time- for example the recent data that suggests in older people there is more emotional sensitivity to others.

While we debate our emotional stances on if the universe can be determined by an overriding cosmology down or some sort theory up (Lampion 12-20-10L Without proper contexts of distinguishing the abstract shape or structure of the physics system any theory that precludes a top down or bottom up stance will not be logical, as most likely both ideas apply within a unified system.)

Lampion II Commentary and Origin of these thoughts:

As in the illustration above- if the universe can be reduced to a total randomness in its ultimate physics and space- how do we explain fundamentally and directly the fact that there does seem to be structural restraints- that is that in a world of widest variations of dorkstork space- how, beyond ideas of decoherence, do we explain the observed complexity in the world- in fact that between the remote universals and existential we experience a total centering with variability that seems to persist and only obeys laws mostly somewhere between totally free and totally determined?

You Were No Angel (Sleepy and Bluegrass on the Radio at Night)

I go to at the open mike at the mouse trap bar. I am in the agreed box from where the band stands to give us the music and the lights to which the people drink and dance and sing along. They start with Silent Night- a song so familiar the musician in me can see the errors and appreciate their trying the song, see the differences in the styles of say the woodwind harmonica and the percussion against the body of the electric base- how each individual in this play works his individual path and style.

But I am struck by the mandolin player. All of reality comes down to an atom in one of its strings. All the city around me, all the people I've known, over time too as the masseuse I knew once in the coffee shop now has short hair and a new beau that looks angry at me while she says hello. For awhile my vision is blurred as the strings are double strings and they resonate in a duet with each other, love bigger than both of them.

I do not know how it will turn out- but each point in time and each life to which things can be described so complexly, so wastefully it seems of nature and her reproductions, so uncanny that we can take the time to dream, to play, to hope that what we do has at least a purpose for today- or drunk try to enjoy it while the music plays.

Somewhere the music jumps between the memories of my mind. I am a child on US 1 going to Miami. The AM radio makes its cacophony of bells and whistles, dots and dashes, squeals and squeaks. My Dad tunes the channel after one fades away while we went under the bridge. He is looking for country music but finds Blue Grass. He says he cannot stand it but I find it refreshing to the tears in the bottom falling out of the beer glass of his life of blues and cheating hearts. And for a brief few moments I hear the mandolin- and the same atom of metal I hear now- somewhere still resonating with the few persisting and half life of the carbon atoms we are now and still are if we can only grasp it- then.


* * *

comment on Matti's blog post today:

Ulla, I would like to see those diagrams.

Matti,

We have not really talked theory. But around 2003 I did conclude the concept of dark matter and black holes essential for understanding some aspects of biology. In some ways string theory applies too. I was meditating for hours at night in hopes to help a friend with brain cancer.

I am not sure there is a need for a space to be seen as non-linear nor that the quantum theory is the best level to understand such things.

I have not understood your multi-sheeted geometry in a picture- are these embedded in each other or float around generally in some sort of biological field? I mean of course we can describe it one way as magnetic (but what are dark photons but still a metaphor?)

ThePeSla

And perhaps Matti will address further remarks here: (Ulla spam me any time!)

I wonder if this is simply n-ply Riemann regions with complex jumps? I mean there has to be more, especially in a pure 4x4 topological space- I am not sure even as infinite dimensional spinor like geometry the physics of this is so close to the general system of things- is this not a membrane like idea also? Again, what limits the dimensions to low levels? What really determines the interval of lifetimes and could this not still exist in a dimensionless and measureless flatland of general geometries. Are we discussing quasics after all? Do we really understand the idea of dark matter? What of the light a 1000 time dimmer the ATP puts out? How do we address someone who would claim this sounds like Kyrillian photography? And why cannot the geniuses around us see how these ideas relate to biology (including those biological aspects of conscious?)

* * *

Lubos,


If we accept separating the imaginary and real parts of some equations- then of course we can conclude that black holes have the properties as if thermodynamic heat transfer objects.


Are you saying that black holes have a certain higher or hidden mass than we can observe at the Planck scale?


If our hearts are not in this universe and we should leave it- are you saying that perhaps there is a multiverse after all

maybe one less conservative and in the creation of god fer sure atoms we have to explain it by finding a hotter place. :-)

The Pe Sla

Well, it was a long and informative article but I found little new in it that backed up the claims. If string theory as the only reality and game in town somehow is shown out of experimental reach or forever so- the philosopher in me must ask why this is the case of things. Clearly, even in current science theories something very fundamental is missing.

* * *

Today's facebook status:

Each of us has a center naked singularity in space and time and the distance between us fixed and free- as objects in the here and now the void vanishes its hidden creation energy with which we dream.

... So, Lubos, what really stops the mini black holes or even the Higgs from in a sense vanishing in the phenomenal world? Why in theory can it not be emptied? Perhaps we confuse the empty and filled vacua- as perhaps nature herself does.

* * *

And a final note to Ulla today:

http://zone-reflex.blogspot.com

Ulla,

The water drop is a most excellent illustration for the general trend of your blog.

The geometric view we skirt around in many ways can act as if broken super symmetries and hidden higher dimensions.

Matti has always replied and posted my meager questions. I wonder if all of us hope for a new era of theory after all? (Evidently even Lubos)

I wish we all were younger. I am impressed that perhaps the future of Physics is in Finland after all :-)

Let us not regret living in interesting times- not that long ago DNA and photosynthesis I recall were mysteries.

Quantum is just a term really, eternity in an instant, none of us needs to throw out the Cheshire quantum cat with the Dark waters.

We are what we are, something like a superconductive, supercomputer, super-collider at room temperature with some sense of life measured in barns and barney- I am sure those who come after us will wonder and admire our brains- in these matters our children's futures are very bright.

Thanks for the blog.

The PeSla

* * *



From one of the blogs I follow they pointed this out:
http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/

which searched books from 1800 to 2000 to find some words.

I tried it for:

solid geometry
octonions
metaphysics and

solid geometry
relativity
quantum mechanics

Now, clearly when the abstract concept octonion was high the publication and interest in metaphysics and solid geometry was low (in fact not taught by the universities for awhile- I should have tried linguistics too)

and interestingly at the hight of solid geometry both relativity and the quantum theory was in a valley low- also the word uranium was more prevelant over the abstract (that chart not posted). But these charts are new to me and I know you can have multiple words on the same chart.

* * *