Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Physicality and Mathematics

Physicality and Mathematics L. Edgar Otto August 16, 2011

I come here this morning with thoughts on a different way to view the landscape of string theory, from a few notes and coloring between sparse lines establish a system or conclusion- rather fill in what has evolved in my thinking. It is a new experience for me really to apply to physics the creative juices flowing in the background that comes unbidden from mysterious places and sometimes full blown- as in ideas of philosophy and themes or details of a poem or song.


As mathematics is an intrinsic part of the being of things I too asked the question yesterday of this author in the blog I follow which is really beautiful and has a certain good grounding as philosophy. There have been other times I have drank from the pure water of the babbling brook of this authors heart.

But mathematics is something we at times stumble on or in the hard enough work it dawns on us what some picture or solution is- but why? I quite imagine in the arrangement of the color cube notation that some people find easy and I do not (of course they can miss half the picture), is a key in fact to answer what nature does herself. It is a question of cognition and computation.

From a more geometrical view some ideas are really need to find the right paths or restrictions when consciousness or nature tries or experiences the order of things assumed and causal or ad hoc. For surely given a state or ensemble of objects in disorder in theory there is at least one path that could return to whatever origin there is- ad hoc after the fact God's-eye view and the finding of submarines in stealth from the confused echos of the jumbled sonar. It does not matter that we can assume at any point that there are no certain links to such paths or predictions.

To this end I offer a new theory or further refine the idea of iota particles (that is a point- ray rather than a string only or a point only formalism, and one that is in principle scaleless), a particle really of the Omnium. What makes this an idea of physics is it defines on one hand the idea of action-reaction (also a state of vibration) on the other hand the looping as in strings in regards to the compass of the grounds of a complex or ensemble of iotas is less strict than what we assume we know of the idea of rigidly defined natural dimensions. It is no wonder, knowing greater energy may be involved in higher space, that the leaking of such loops suggest an idea of gravity, but one that is lost in the landscape.

Or that we use such combinatorial or string methods to describe our distinctions, seemingly physical and given on some level and in some recognition of space or math properties, of the styles of particles involved- mediators, bosons, fermions and the whole particle zoo of virtual things. Yet, with the vertexes of the color cube type theories as in the above illustration one could sort it out to make distinctions in the fields and particles ro what is the fermion or boson.

A key idea, of Newton really, the action-reaction, states that action is blind and can go in default instantly into the center of some system. But the reaction goes around a bit. Sometimes it goes around so much it allows vast organisms to develop by delayed biochemical pathways- and where things are finite, as Rowlands points out, such delays are in a sense lagging and take time.

* * *

There is no reason to make the universe conform to our ideas of a total theory, and so to make a metaphor as if consciousness is a property of the universe itself, if the universe does not make such a limitation of cognition- while a partial answer is useful,even universal, we should keep in mind that in effect we are limiting our own metaphors of cognition.

Indeed, such is the case as "the only way possible Riofrio's theory could be right," (and that to me seems to keep the question open for after all at the remote conceptions I have already considered an inversion of the geometry where in many theories the inverse of the inverse square laws make sense)" is with considerations of such remote or initial conditions." Pitkanen replies to me in his comment to my comment on his evaluation of her hypothesis. Both total theories on the face of it while universal are not as general as the metaphors of a total Omnic system or what the universe does despite how we try to describe or understand it.

* * *

*1 - there are distinct possible states of singularities with or without structure.

*2 - the relations between iotas or point-string physical localities are more general than a natural progression of the concept of dimensions.

*3 - a structure may have a center (for simple connectedness) or not and we can regard the shift between such views of a singlarity as a surface or one of higher dimensional depth.

*4 - the division of a color cube structure may be a minimum quantization (baseball curve) or a division into three regions of two faces each, in at least two chiral ways and one that is neutral.

*5 - the six colors may color a cube of 24 regions but the opposite ones are the same four colors along the axes (feel free to explore this mult-raygun or angle and right angle, idea in 4 space.)

*6 - the enumeration of possibilities of the coloring of such axes follows the factorials but starting from the highest number and the x1 last one is forced or left out as the last counting number.

*7 - the symmetries of the group of such enumerations apply- thus at 6! we observe the intelligible pairings of in regards to duality and the symmetry of groups.

*8 - at zero dimensions the question of inertia as action-reaction is non-existent or ambiguous, depending perhaps on how we are to regard complete dimension levels or what in a sense is the idea of the filled vacua.

*9 - (I am still not clear on the mechanism that distinguishes the over flow of the chiral forms of matter not being equivalently created save perhaps a deeper consideration of the Leibniz background as assemblies of ordered and disordered cubes- that is I do not show it yet in the computations)

*10 - in an iota of one dimensional continuous breath we have a center point or not symbolically halfway of over the potential infinity such that we may imagine the iota finite point vibrating against the ends and making its own action and lagged reaction.

*11 - an iota may fall into such a center and it be to a higher or lesser natural dimension in context. Or an iota in context may creatively arise, or it can get lost in a stable but isolated loop save perhaps its collective effects of self-recursive space structures.

*12 - in three space the minimum quantiation-quasication surface through the center, if there are 8 corners and inversion, results in 9 transitive entities or from a connected view 10 as two in the center of a cube. But such internal singularity complexes may condense into powers of two.

*13 - in the reduced form a iota line segment is 3 singularities or the diagonal of matrices with three styles of singularities, 1 or 2 in the context center, a square is 5 with center, a cube is 17. (what is the structure and what natural dimension of 257 with center and so on?)

*14 - we might consider the difference of some curves of falling from a continuous view as a measure of some observed natural dimension level phase effects- for example the fastest fall or roll of an object, for a lag consideration of the expression or averaging of what are otherwise integral numbers averaged.

*15 - the filled vacuum idea, or the relative vacuum as a force (Newtons relativity tell us a board scaled up across a ditch would collapse across a river) such as perhaps the monopole as point and electrostatic field as string, is a theory that needs generalization (as does the Pauli exclusion idea).

*16 - from a corner of 20BDK space the center singularity between them may exhibit a duality of colors, that is the pair production when relativistic ideas are applied and in general the ideas about black hole evaporation or as creative force. (can we create a black hole as such? or is that super-vacuum filled?)

*17 - the colors of the sides of an orthogon follow the linear integration of the Conway grid labels and its higher matrix analogs.

*18 - from some other structural point complex we can have a 2n portal to different orientations and general momenta directions as a quasi finite subset of them in what we may decide is a unitary field of determined directions. This is a generalization of the quasic ordering in a plane (the Z code or a fractal filling at infinity of a brane) in higher space representations (is there a general theory for this hierachy of things also or its it only partially true of the paradoxical structures of space?)

*19 - two or more branes can intersect in a creative point- or some distinguishing of such points as a singularity complex involving discrete and continuous values. (would we then call this generalization a membrane?)

*20 - particles may behave locally and experimentally as if the laws of symmetry apply and are in a sense absolute, as well the existence of such a notion most often corresponding to the existence of such particles in a quasi-locality creative context.

* * *

*21 - it no longer follows in a rigidly intelligible total theory (especially ones that reach into subatomic structure as an extended analog to this- the term hyperentanglement for example in Rowlands) that the removal from an infinite lattice of a note and its connecting points results in a shift from flat Euclidean to Spherical geometry via those harmoinics or other methods. For what is the node and the point but an iota point-string of some questionable location of varieties of singularities (including Higgs-like entities that are in effect like a pion as it appears other than a gluon mediator as a strong and weak force.

*22 - one possible theorem to consider in the arrow of time where in a world ambiguous to the symmetry of intertial direction, that these over a range of dimensions that they are invariant in structure but reduce in dimension of its real or virtual simply connected singularity (or but a surface no matter how we may interpret the values of forces in relation to the idea of electron shielding of the bare charge to presumably a minimum value or even zero) that the physicality of the what we signify as a filled vacuum regardless of sign, results in the direction as a natural dimensional reduction in symmetry considerations where intertia if first and formost the non-necessity of something to react against so it is not forbidden on a fundamental level of reality. Again, when things are so simplified and number appears to be intimate with its reality to physicality, we can image the remote and ideal points at infinity as if the reaching of some quasi yet concrete limit, but surely not just one we approach indefinitely no matter what the scale of our total theory.

* * *

It occured to me to google Charles Hinton's cubes (of which I had never seen them described but what they could do- for one thing the finding of 24 of them... wondering if such logic corresponds to my simple 24 in the quasic logic which deduced the 24 against the usual rules. But so far I see nothing exceptionally different than what we know of such cubes. Last time I checked the information was hard or impossible to find despite many references with the usual how such a procedure - well, the game of "instant insanity" seems to have a good name for such a puzzle for a lot of people :-)


* * *

No comments:

Post a Comment