Friday, November 25, 2011
Tempered (Scale) Space and Primes
Tempered (Scale) Space and Primes L. Edgar Otto November 24, 2011
I have the feeling that we do not really know how to reckon, to count when we try to do deep calculation (no matter how intricate the equations and symbols.) It is of interest that coming here after the holiday break which seems a long time in my posting I find Lubos with such a quality posting which seems to touch on my and other bloggers in this issue of how we use and perceive numbers.
This post addresses some of the issues of a more general Triality and in particular the third axes in relation to prime numbers and Kea's and Pitkanen's take on them also.
I offer a almost numerical model of the 15 or 30 cubes of these primes discussed on Kea's link to wiki, the three sets of primes make an interesting factored pattern in quasic space- but I not know why or if such primes listed are limited or an accident but I know that their quasic arrangements apply. In this model at first try is the z axis as oriented among each other in a variation of distinct ways of which I vaguely see them as particles in relevance but not sure on what level of reality these particles exist in what higher symmetries and so on. One thing for sure this way of looking at the z or temperature direction is a distinct if informal recreational view of the triality beyond Lubos posting as a presentation which does discuss among us the issue of CMX mixing such values and if they directly connect. One might call this genderfication of the underlying concepts geometrically.
But all this goes back to what would have been a fourth page or new post from a more philosophic perspective- that is Syncopated Rhetorical Style (A Unified Alphanumeric Age)
Such ideas have their price in relation to others (whom appear much more stupid to me as if I had the stereotypical arrogance of Sheldon on the sit com Big Bang of which some people making a middle class living with degrees at least to second year calculus discuss ways to evaluate how long a project of encoding may take via the Fibonacci numbers (of days) which is of course not he case in the quasics as a more accurate picure and the log, as I have said, does not really address the issues of the infinite beyond e to so many decimals or phi for that matter in the syncopated or calculation mode- the number crunching view verses the linguistic and geometrical visual modeling. We seem to have degrees of this mental development literally that reaches some threshold of understanding say beyond whatever autism may be.
Twice I was asked if the technical information in the sit come Big Bang was accurate and related the story of Lubos as a consultant- of which I said the information is accurate as their better trained friends said- but the theories can be quite different in their approaches to their truths.
I also checked links here that for some reason put me above the worlds average of presence on the internet in the top 96% or two million (for what that is worth) as these links were the traffic sources for this blog. Anyway, this is what the fourth page says (not a photo this time).
Syncopated Rhetorical Style (SRS)
*Noether - Non-commutative algebraic systems (do not necessarily resolve transitively over a holographic shell) prime polynomial numerical analysis... in relation to surds, like pi and e as syncopated or number crunching (SRS).
*Thus a middle ground for the concept of commutativity and non-commutativity.
*Ordered distributivity as a general prime like uniqueness (also do-first issues).
*The abstract value sign contained, zero or greater than, or if positive less than 0.
*If (Noether) light has a purpose (least action and a relation to the spherical shell K-group) then >c would have a greater purpose in potential infinity.
*Understanding is not guaranteed by containing concepts exclusively within a range of syncopated number crunch styles.
*Although in a wider concept of number the issues of logic are freed.
*Some people and there perceptive endowments cannot see the visual or geometrical (Greek Rhetorical) view hidden in the symbnolic syncopated algebra easily.
*Expanding generalities of unified alphanumeric spaces decohere yet focus unique states, place and paths among singularities.
* * *
And on Kea's blog this comment as it directed me to such prime numbers:
I took from your links the discussion on super-singular and other low prime numbers put them into my grid and got some rather interesting patterns.
The adding of one as in the 56 or 57 dimensions does refer to more than even and odd and how we see as did the Greeks of zero or one as the first dimension. (without zero they developed a more geometric style- more rhetorical than syncopated view). We may add a dimension or see some negative absolute value as less than zero- but more can be observed here than something presumed non-linear. (I use Pythagorean concept of gender as an old view of number-not to be mystical in the sense such ideas are now viewed.)
I also presented a rather recreational model of the 15 supersingularity primes in the colour cubes- for now of interest for its own sake and to show perhaps that things may be a little wider in view than absolutely symmetrical.
What these things would be if they are particles I am not sure- but I do agree with you things like mentioned in your next post may be a little vague and fanciful- mirror neutrinos in and hard to see- but no gravitons, gravitinos or fairies. (of which we may also have a historical disconnect as well that between physics and mathematics.
The Pe Sla