## Thursday, November 17, 2011

### Transfinite Singularities

Transfinite Singularities
L. Edgar Otto November 17, 2011

The concept of zero division and the exclusion proviso of it in the useful information from equations may not apply at both the simplest and the most general description of numbers.

A general plane is a shadow (as higher spaces can be condensed and superimposed projected onto it) and a complete field for the complex numbers, and it reflects at least n-transfinite set spaces include higher curve enumerations

In relation to the ordering and location on the real x axis, (Riemann and zeta and so on...) and De Moivre's theorem so to recursively operate on real and complex virial spaces of infinite span potentials in all complex directions or contained real ones, we have numbers involving here the binary power (p-adic and quasic) continua. In particular - 1/2 mirrored vertical to the real x axis. This pint can act as a direction and attractor so be a Complex Singularity to the rest of spaces.

But in the process of deriving this we have to apply throughout the self recursive and referential identities the proviso excluding zero across the useful information or field. As such, at complex singularities we establish the depth (as well distinguish the span and its indefinite range of degrees of freedom) so to establish it for a plane more general than complex numbers, that is we ground the quasic plane (or q-branes and spaces) as a physical theory.

Information and Colour L. Edgar Otto November 16, 2011

In consideration of why we dream in color or black and white, as in the contemplations of this blogger: http://schwitzsplinters.blogspot.com ,depending on how we view continuous or discrete inward or outward space structure systems, I find hints on how to relate a less ambiguous definition of information in a model that relates to the physical spectrality issues of color. (to solve this question psychologically is a model to solve the question of color as physics).

Within an electromagnetic field or observing it from a distance our interpretations (and developmental cognition processing) may have dynamic relations or neutral ones regarding information and color. In this sense color is quasi-independent as to be defined as quantitative or qualitative where our traditions are attracted to more of a scientific or philosophic view of this.

I have wondered if watching color television does indeed store more information and so leads to color dreaming as in the bloggers idea that watching black and white TV might give us a generation of black and white dreamers. Do I use vastly more memory, say to recall a Tele show if it is in color than in black and white? Is not the world full of color? Now watching black and white TV with color information transmitted from the source one could decode (say by inference patterned discs or pulses) - so is this the same amount of information to be stored and retrieved or more? Otherwise it may be information variegated yet random and neutral this not useful as such and not distinguishable from neutral color information. So a sort of
quasi-noise, perhaps the grey noise for a name, either significant or neutral.

Evidently the electromagnetic field pulses (as lately and historically stimulating the tissues, bones and nerves, to heal by active electromagnetism) is as a raw wave of radiation or as a digital recording- does affect physical systems and puts decoded observation on a firmer physical basis.

* * * * *

Variance, especially involving ideas like isospin and 1/2 spin and so on, are casually and causally parallel and orbital in the higher quasic space to which complex number space is complete and limited to the scope of applying physical interpretations such as rest, force, particles to a closed system as four dimensions. In the 4x4 matrix, from which we have ten values Einstein considered at "rest" or the 6 in some sense electromagnetic- these too should can be considered at rest from the quantum view. Clearly maintaining vibrational quantum like spaces reaching this fundamental level vanish at quasicity to something deeper- it is no surprise it is hard to find a Higgs particle outside anything more than the complex number formalism if that field almost eludes us. It is a hopeful shot in the dark to expect by some accident some particle shows up at this narrow closed state of things that coincidentally or probably so confirms a theory from within its assumptions.

This thought on my mind walking to the coffee shop then finding things that evoked comments on line:

http://motls.blogspot.com/2011/11/tom-banks-and-anti-quantum-zealots.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LuboMotlsReferenceFrame+%28Lubos+Motl%27s+reference+frame%29

Dilaton, and Gene,

Keep your eyes open. There is a lot more to physics than our narrow vision of quantum theory. And a lot more to mathematics than Branes and the Complex number systems.

These theories are a little more than incomplete, Gene, as Planck said to accept a new theory we must wait for the old generation to die off.

Particle, anti-particle, sign, reverse sign... all are conventions we cling to and interpret within some almost closed and focusing or decoherent view.

Not that I support this author critiqued brilliantly by our Lubos ( there are also higher statistics possible that those merely attributed to quantum theory if there is wider unifed physics) but I see where some of his directions come from, and he gives them a more formal treatment.

The issue as well the appeals to illusion is more than questions of what exist or not independent of some form of observer- if we want more formal scientific focus.

The PeSla

***

Alejandro,

I encountered and answered an email from Yuri last year. This idea is another example of the universal patterns of the new physics and the numbers come up such as the 128 in Kea's comment above.

Kea,

Might the idea of 14 "qubit" space be a good view here?

Yuri when I saw his later stuff on line had much to say about tetrahedrons. But I was seeing it as a simple one but something more fundamental so I did not look that deeply into his ideas. How wise to consider the imaginary mass.

BTW if my comment is true then we could expect more like 48 protons in mass- yes?

ThePeSla

****

http://schwitzsplinters.blogspot.com/2011/11/empirical-evidence-against-my-view-of.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FFHhv+%28The+Splintered+Mind%29

Hi,

I wrote something inspired by your contemplations and in relation to what is light and color in general- and what is such information. It will be posted shortly on my blog:

http://www.pesla.blogspot.com

I think there may be a way to set up an experiment or survey for the data, by such considerations.

ThePeSla

* * *

http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8967515&postID=2890924686345368544&page=1&token=1321559341900

Hi,

That's me in 78.

I also have one of me in 68 with my hair all mussed up like Einstein (a joke for my friend) but on a blackboard I am illustrating my 4 dimensional chess game. Oddly, none of my teacher understood. If I can find it.

Yes, we have to begin somewhere and existentially commit awhile- but would I know what I know (valuable or not) if I had the training of the day. I have known physicists who had to change careers when a general theory failed.

How can we go through life and not wonder about these things?

:-) The PeSla

* * *