**The Foundations of Particle Physics**

**(Projective Color Iota Dynamics)**

*L. Edgar Otto*22 June, 2012

We say a picture is
worth a thousand words, but here I offer you a picture that links to thousands
more where those pictures show the path to a more unified view of particle
physics and explains general structure with our haunting sense of model errors
along the way.

It also raises new
possibilities of speculation. The
general idea I concieved in 1964 of smaller particle like parts to an
electron I called iotas with my so
called "Omnium Properties" as if a dynamic dividing by zero. In 1968
I concluded there were 8 of these for an electron which of course was beyond
the pale of current thinking and remained a vague and doubtful intuition. Today I encounter the idea again. Among other things it suggests the diagrams I
drew can be see as our first level of a particle table. The three colors alternating (and it is the
alternations that seem to shift and give us a sense of oscillation) are echoed
in the quark as a point like electron of so many iotas.

The duality between a
point and an edge of a polyhedron seems to me complimentary to that of a point
and a face. We can also expand the
spectral ordering or looping in a color wheel by the permutations of a set of
colors. The sense of symmetry of where
these are balanced constitutes a form of what we tend to suggest is a
particle. We immediately find the
Fermion and Boson division, and the grounding for exclusion or union of the
dynamic sets of so many quarks regardless of our conventions of signs. This duality I imagined as geometry back and
forth between a proton and a neutron in a nucleus (rather than just the exchange of a mediator
particle in the models of those years).

We also see reasons
that things are conserved more or less within a measure as if particle
decay. Now others have understood or
suggested the pattern of Feynman diagrams to so generalize, but clearly there
are at least two ways to do this. One
coming from the continuous view and one from the more discrete view. It is a matter of taste as well as ammunition
for debate as to what starting point we begin to reach some sort of neutrality
and final unification of all the forces of known physics as we now know
it. The fundamental view over these
plane graph generalizations shows a central view and count- or one from a more
flat view as if we see an atom from outside.
This is the question of what role such expanded symmetry plays (as
complicated as the graphs may seem it is only about the next layer of four
space matter and the theory can be vastly expanded in the count even if it is
iotas as the points of still higher polytopes that we vaguely confuse or look
for as some form of super symmetry) in the idea of holographs and energy
conservation of Noether depends on the idea of what sort of centered thing
belongs in what sort of natural space dimension. So too a wider understanding of all these
views for ideas of coherence intimately tied to thermodynamics.

I use the color
notation here for the Otto-Conway matrix of six colors (8 would be four space
and so on with conceptual restraints as to what we mean by higher mass
structures). Clearly we have a count of wholes and halves to form that essential difference at the lowest super symmetry, the kinetic and potential difference,
in the count of the iotas with or without a more complex (Kea like) center. It is not just a matter of 0 or 2 as the
count of all orthogonal sub elements as an (Euclidean) grounding law of odd or
even numbers or dimensions.

We can have the
duality between the octahedron and the cube of the same oddness or evenness but
over the "quasic" field we have something akin to the ancient idea of
numbers with gender. This will appear
naturally as if the logic diagrams of general and Aristotle's validity and
implication directions. We can make
among other interpretations and hidden assumptions a rule that no two iota
octahedra share the same plane or space.

The grey cube
iota-plexes in the lower right corner of the illustration in black and white can
be said to represent the muons ( the generalization of generations requires a
better integration, known, with the standard physics and my quasic plane,
something similar to branes, view). The
triads of colors ABF represent moreover
the faces of an icosahedron an also from some view the 30 edges. These are the quarks. The 30 color combinations of three or 60 with
four space inversion symmetries, would suggest various possibilities for a
higher structure (albeit a geometric analog) of the symmetries of life space
(including DNA coding in all its permutations of a mere generational like color
shift). Or I can imagine in higher physical space these may constitute a whole
class to add to the particle zoo (Is the inside of a quasar not potentially a
place for even higher dimensional matter?).

If nothing else comes
of this it is a visual aid to the ideas of combinations and the algebra (here
on the lowest level of exploring things orthogonally).

Enjoy. Your central perspective is as intricate as
mine and together each and every iota as if a singularity (monad as a physical
word would not be bad for this phrase especially as it concerns mirrors and
windows) is such a perspective in a fractal manner in a much wider universe.

It is worth noting
that in an array of these cubes in a cube of these seven objects as in the jack-stone that the diameter is 5 of them presumably cubed for a centering of
three layers but if we say there are two in the center than 8 x 27 = 6x6x6,
this requires accounting too of a small part that seems hidden or perhaps a
door or window for decay fluidity. Or we can find surpluses, 5! does not equal the 9x9x9 of space but
again there is a straightforward measure of numerical excess.

* * * * *

## No comments:

## Post a Comment