L. Edgar Otto 02 June, 2012
I walked by the sculpture called Zion from the artist in South Dakota and notices that from the angle and the light that it had duplications of the outside structure as if an onion of shells. Recall, I had compared it to an atom or a universe. I thought it would be a fine picture to emphasize again the differences offered for foundation ideas of a more generalized quasic space, one that moreover shows where some of the alternatives in the physics description make these views stand out in their own right as perhaps useful new branches of the discipline.
I noticed that its overall symmetry was not conceived as balanced by the artist but casually so with gaps as well as regions of circular discs or hollows. I am wondering also what sort of picture Ulla asked me to try to draw- I think these can be so drawn or at least slices of such things that enable us to at least imagine a wider picture with structure.
But the issue here is one also of these spherical layers equivalent to the idea of multi layers of membranes and what forces exist between them in the mathematical analysis- and as Ulla says it is a question of some form of entropy relation. In a steady state universe at least I quite imagine that, as in Penrose's concept of quantanglement where the stars make the entropy as a source and black holes are its sink that this can be a dialectical and measurable dynamics of change despite the overall balance of these existence and non existent states.
We do not have this in the reduction to string theory but only hints of it for the string can be open ended or in a loop- but it is also what is outside this reduction that hints also of some structure as a field or gauge topology to which we imagine it can describe what we want to if we understood the weights in representations for mass or gravity. TGD of Pitkanen seems to me capable of generalizing to this neutral situation as indeed a form or statement of the dynamics in the topology. Of course from my view it is still but an essential part of the bigger picture. On open string I call loxidromic and a closed one I call minimum quantization.
I approach it then from the informational models. What happens outside the nucleus determines what happens outside was the first guess (actually of my father LLO in answer to a question I put to him once) But in the quasic generalization where surfaces are abstractly connected it is clear to me these have the same sort of structures and ideas of superposition as if a stack of branes or shells of an onion. I find it interesting that an artist would picture some form of Heaven, Zion, this way and give it more of a sacred name.
This transcends the usual meaning that arises in the Midwest as a structured object like Dante or Bohr as systems centered, parton like in the old sense. The idea too of trinity, or the three way psychology as Freud, or reduced further the parent, adult, child idea of transactional analysis. Yet it is the purpose or action of light that is the analogy here and the general idea of what sort of spectrum string remains on a curved or flat membrane surface. Is there a (psychological) transaction between different levels of neutrino mixing and can it be of an intelligible measure.
This initial theory may lack a certain depth as some first blush theories do for I envision two clocks of which one cannot tell by itself the correct mechanical time but the difference with another clock in a constant ratio might pinpoint the time (ideas of simultaneity naively aside). But I mean this more like a quasifinite sense of sequences (after all in the Zion space open and closed are the same ground and description) and these relate, as with the 11 dimensional idea to what I think Pitkanen means by the prime numbers such that (in terms of Fibonacci-Phi) his use of 89 in itself without his derivation explicit even). Over the plane or the sphere membrane is the two such clocks of infinite primes of which we can measure or sense the more fixed unity of time in the variations. This moreover establishes such directionality as the angles given say the 64 codon chain code.
Let us note also that on a still deeper level a little more general physics is required than that one global photon can initiate a number of paths and objects in the observed recent surprise involving photosynthesis. It is not clear that such a global phenomenon is free from a dynamic product of the state of such primes as things permute or perturb if these connect on a deeper transactional level. I like to think that this is a sort of grounding at least in the scope and compass of this possibly partial new physics also to higher pictures.
But it is enough for now to see the quasic idea between levels of the influences, especially the idea of something like a negative or neutral charge in the inside of nucleons in the Dante model as the shell plus the space between the shell as if a general omnic ray or closed higher space to which the boundaries are set and the dynamics contained within an action level including the limits of what is a pure conservation law such as that of the velocity of light. What then makes these connections between levels intelligible and in the default of averages congruent, commensurable, and coherent?
Only at this first level of conception intellectually might we truly begin to ask the deeper questions on the nature of the structure for cosmology. Why not in our naive idea of influence in our universe by other universes the same sort of explanation by one universe with these evolved prime informational multidimensional membrane dynamics? Or is that question a rather primitive one itself?
* * * * * *