September 23 : Late in posting I plan the next one, the germ of an idea that takes advantage of the principles above to be called Distributive Prime Patterns & the Politics of People or
Unified Primes Pattern Systems, which considers a generalization of how we define the prime numbers in view of the quasic and wormhole ways to organize topological and algebraic spaces.
For those who have followed or will follow my awakening of reasoning in this blog, here beyond those spaces into the aspects of the physics level I call the Omnium, it is a questioning of my own first blush conception of differences in the quasic grid and the contents- that is what I called the epsilon-delta idea.
The problem of distribution of the patterns of primes beyond the familiar or traditional level of investigation as a unified theory will include special developments of higher prime number ideas among them the p-adic and so on. This continues to generalize things and question the limited foundations of a pure quasic conception of space also- in fact particles are at least a merger of Pitkanen and my ideas.
I notice today Lubos actually talks about one consideration I put into my manuscript in relation to this yesterday- we know in normal space that had to do with gravity that Einstein's thought experiment that leads to equivalence principle that we may stop but not reverse gravity as in a falling elevator. Yet he even knew there was differences beneath certain event and other boundaries. I question the model of Tyson in particular where by stretching and squeezing that if one fell into a black hole he would bifurcate. But what is this but a 2 to the nth, and moreover the patterns that would take this bifurcation to what approaches a continuous description (for beyond this is the new level of mathematics and physics concerning number) and the Eddington idea of the adding of one or anything such as the value of mass to an equation or say any such constant as addition including the primes Mersenne to the more general trace and pattern of what makes a prime in omnium general space.
We should not also the idea of flatness as Lubos mentions as not just a coincidence of scale or exploding equations as a quantum idea that get ever more chaotic but a foundational stance of the existence of what I now call the higher dream space or capacitor space.
Can anyone say really if such a dream space that the Dream that accepts our curvatures of falling as receptive to our dream designs cannot be an actual Deity? or in some special cases if we can reverse gravity as such that where there is emptiness thought we may find evil after all- of course if I follow Rowlands I have gone on to generalize a metaphysical principle here on the nothingness- yet it is clear we need to understand better the foundations of number and as well generalized the quantum idea (of which the universe and its principles may be grounded in computation as the quasifinite between the steady state and the dynamics evolving and static forms that too being a sort of higher equilibrium. I leave it to the reader to decide how this relates to ideas of dark matter and so on in general...
* * * * *