**Supercondensed Abstract Atomic Matter**

*L. Edgar Otto*14 September, 2012

In view of the more
foundational aspects of quasic space I must reconsider Seaborg's speculation on
the extension of the chemical elements beyond the 120 or 136 as if there were
an analog to the electron in a higher or different space akin to the idea of a level
of mystically defined dimensions as used in the common literature as a vague
but intuitively and qualitatively equivalent to the more geometrical
definition. There would be no limit to
these levels and analogs in sight or the levels of condensing as far as we
can now see into the next generalization of the physics. So for now let us
style them quasic electrons, or quaselectrons that exceed the fine structure
constant in normal space.

Clearly, I am not
necessarily talking about either the ideas of compactifaction nor those of
analogs to quantum theories that center more mass into nuclei inside
nuclei. In that space itself is creative
in my senses so too the idea of mass I have vaguely called multidimensional
mass, now more general. It is not clear
such things are observable but by simple count over a quasic symmetry brane of
the natural level or basis and the relation to self-dual elements of the
diagonals of such magic matrices to the general transitive properties the
quasic structure does imply stereonomic and teleoscoping loops and boundary
limitations in a quasifinite manner to expressed physical phenomena and
directionality. Moreover, the role of prime numbers come to fore again in this
theory's context for in the spdf.. levels we should exclude the composite odd
numbers up to 17 on the next level of counting quasic cell multiplicity
structures.

* * * * * * * * * * *

In the illustration
Qx:00.01.00 above I offer a rather simple example of some path along the edges
of a hypercube of twelve nodes and twelve links moving on the level of the
dimension surface in question. Beyond
this we can shift the initial perspective to any of the twelve node and
furthermore we can define space between the nodes that are not as in error
codes or fractal algorithms on other subcell levels than the maximum surface
unto the dimension in question.

More than this, as we
try to describe what in nature is the potential ambiguity between open and
closed loops (for example in knight move patterns or in fractal curves) we
should consider the symmetry breaking that involves the totality of a
quasifinite abstract structure- for example we can divide the hypercube such
that a circuit is doubled that the path visits each node and all links twice-
that presumably can be divided to double the presented volume of the abstract
space (not just the considerations of what duality of some solids does to
realign say the links as in an octahedron and a cube duality.)

* * * * * * *

The variation on the
Confederate States Flag (because it is an historical example of the use of
proportions that involve the Fibonacci numbers over a pixel space that implies
the depth of quasic layering and the structural limits to actual physical
construction of material objects beyond power ratios unto the dimension in
question) make some interesting patterns across the alpha x and beta y unified
direction to physically inverse the sense of Feynman diagrams expanded (but not
necessarily in quasic depth for the hidden symmetries). The code from the civil war for the 26
letters in the Qx illustration is intended to show a linking from some item
preceded by or followed by some other item in a matrix, again a letter into
itself does not relatively move, this to show directionality in a general and
transitive digraph procedure and does divide certain numbers such as the
tempered 12 tones of music into intelligible and more clearly defined named
chords.

These should be
applied to the quasic depth in some form of the representation within a
totality. In a local space that
separates coherent quasifinite systems the role of the phi or tau ratio
determines the freedom in a closed but contained area such as with a
quasicrystal decagon with internal arrangements as in the general concept
posted earlier as "PeSla's Cube."

* * * * * * *

Researching independently in developing these methods has proven fruitful if only a
different approach in that I made useful procedures usually to solve some
problem like the classification of music themes. It takes a certain confidence or familiarity
over a long time to have the faith in one's own system for it to dawn on
thought that these are equal in parts to the general order of world academic
standards and those who are free to be the innovators and self learners- the old
advantage of being outside and then beyond the social systems. The greatest good for the greatest number as
an ethic from an outside view is not the best we can do with logic in our new
times and our stances toward future generations.

I find a sense of
beauty and wonder in the ability to abstractly move through these more general
spaces as the next step going beyond the thrill of new discovery now past. It is worth the effort and is a leap in at
least my understanding of the world and our place in it. I look back on the quantum relativity of
Eddington of 1929 and as comprehensive in the desire to be a theory of
everything, to seem a complete theory and one that in a sense did resolve the
still divided issues of the first two modern physics as now a very constrained
and limited view of reality for all of the beauty of that particular theory of
unified physics theory. Not to say it is obsolete or its grounding without
certainty on its own level- the intuitive idea of counting all the electrons in
a sense in the whole of the universe.
Genetics alone if we are to understand it as physics should be an
example of what such theories if generalized can do to explain the complexity
of the world and ourselves better.

It also resolves some
of the political issues that are strained in the political eras which on the
face of it are a dedication or calling to some particular faith or ideology-
that is we can make better decisions in which our present civilization takes a
further leap, one perhaps with more reasonable care in the risks of
exploration. I can even imagine that in
some sense this level of higher dimensional matter might be taken as a physical
fact that we may be able to have control, a whole new world to explore in dimensions
not lost in the expanse of time and space- still short of the idea of heaven,
and short of what we should learn about mathematics that still eludes us in
relation to the general quasinfinite Omnium, that sum total and miscellaneous
collection of ideas and facts we rely on as if that part of necessary reality
we call science but one that does not limit the mystery and diversity of the
human spirit and of the nature of organic life in general.

* * * *

I would like to add a comment to Lubos for his blog post on the abc proof of which I did not see on New Scientist yesterday as it was required to log on... Thanks for the explanation, I have pondered this Fermat puzzle for years. I do not think it is quite all the case as it seems to involve only continuous considerations while there is a finite counterpart, both extreme views as with all ideas of infinite descent - so it tells us more about the role of proof and what instances there are of physicality such as a concrete variation in things like light speed that do not violate the general scheme of relativistic assumptions such as the controversy of neutrino observations recently.

To those who follow my blog's logic you will find many comments on this state of things that fit into the wider picture and they do involve aspects of the nature of numbers such as primes and a little more we need to make explicit where the numbers are not integers, that is the squares and so on talked about. The finite view is essential for the applications to genetics by the simple counting, group theory is further generalized. Gravity in a sense does need some discrete quantization after all for a balanced view.

As for me I would not have wasted a life but would have regretted all the hours of quite contemplation only to come close but not reach this most beautiful of pictures of symmetry patterns. I was hoping one day we shared a Pilsner somewhere sometimes. But we do not have as much time and freedom as we could have...

not submitted due to out of library time....

I would like to add a comment to Lubos for his blog post on the abc proof of which I did not see on New Scientist yesterday as it was required to log on... Thanks for the explanation, I have pondered this Fermat puzzle for years. I do not think it is quite all the case as it seems to involve only continuous considerations while there is a finite counterpart, both extreme views as with all ideas of infinite descent - so it tells us more about the role of proof and what instances there are of physicality such as a concrete variation in things like light speed that do not violate the general scheme of relativistic assumptions such as the controversy of neutrino observations recently.

To those who follow my blog's logic you will find many comments on this state of things that fit into the wider picture and they do involve aspects of the nature of numbers such as primes and a little more we need to make explicit where the numbers are not integers, that is the squares and so on talked about. The finite view is essential for the applications to genetics by the simple counting, group theory is further generalized. Gravity in a sense does need some discrete quantization after all for a balanced view.

As for me I would not have wasted a life but would have regretted all the hours of quite contemplation only to come close but not reach this most beautiful of pictures of symmetry patterns. I was hoping one day we shared a Pilsner somewhere sometimes. But we do not have as much time and freedom as we could have...

not submitted due to out of library time....

## No comments:

## Post a Comment