Time, Clay, and the Slow Recapitulation of Simulations and Interpretations.
Progress
in the mathematics and physics in that it is an historical process
really adds small differences not that far from a first breakthrough
idea such as that of the Pythagorean Theorem applied to processes and
forms in topology.
While
some concepts are suggested by our quantum theory as to if a certain
path of history could in theory be changed in the past or future or
are forbidden in the states of our probabilistic interpretation in
the spacious present, both modern physics we seek to be unified as
grounding our reality lack this Quasic principle of “similitude
and differences” wherein from that view by human attributes or
machines (the modern conversation with computers in particular), we
should ask what past or future do we change if that landscape is
richer than any one particular path we interpret as evolving in all
possible ones of pasts and presents so changed?
While
some concepts are suggested by our quantum theory as to if a certain
path of history could in theory be changed in the past or future or
are forbidden in the states of our probabilistic interpretation in
the spacious present, both modern physics we seek to be unified as
grounding our reality lack this Quasic principle of “similitude
and differences” wherein from that view by human attributes or
machines (the modern conversation with computers in particular), we
should ask what past or future do we change if that landscape is
richer than any one particular path we interpret as evolving in all
possible ones of pasts and presents so changed? (So it seems to me
that such ultimate grounding for such cosmological questions in that
our understanding and perceptions have reasonable limits of our
individual states of sentience that there is little point in not
sharing our wisdom where it is possible. To withhold such wisdom has
consequences for society and intrinsically cannot be sustained in a
moving historical landscape where as things stand history in a sense
repeats itself so issues like wages, the assembly path and equally
arising but also decaying consumerism is not sustained other than as
a general truth as an apparent totality that also intrinsically
stands. Yet, if we come to use this world view as a scientific
approach beyond the age of war and ideology and where it may fit into
something as quasi-real as a post-economic and even post-alphanumeric
era, there are wider consequences as to just how far we can guide our
own evolution or what we need to do to imagine what seems now at best
debatable forms of speculative philosophy as physics. There is no
'never again' for any state of history given itself more than a sort
of miraculous illusion if as thinking creatures we bury our heads in
the sand or come close to breakthroughs where in some cases of
ignorance we only take the necessary stop signs on faith but not in
the depth of our measures and evaluations regardless of what or who
in nature and on what scale are 'observers'.
No comments:
Post a Comment