**23 December, 2012**

*L. Edgar Otto*
The very large but
finite group of 196883 dimensions
concerning rotations can be thought of as Godel metalanguage unique using the
notation of prime numbers.

The ground for vector
properties as jot products expands the usual laws into those of a wider
non-necessity wherein our intuitive inspiration involves geometry that goes
beyond our notions of linearity into the natural dimensions.

The reduced large
number of dimensions should be seen as derived from its component parts
foundationally and not yet a group number that we understand if it can be used
in a strait forward operations as in the study of subgroups which in any case
we do not necessarily bias the power numbers from the number powered as the
fundamental grounding as in the case where primacy related to only part of such
parallel cases of what is or is not in sequences definite relations of
generating certain numbers as prime such as this question involving Fibonacci
numbers.

There are 15 primes
involved in the numbers to be powered that define the Monster group.

The numbers in the
powering, including 1, sum to 95. Such
distinctions of the numbers suggest a simple relation of expanding basic
orthogonal models for these rotations as if starting from reduced geometric
structures to understand the complexity as if the elements of them undergo expansion dimension wise. We also
analyze the addition as a property of clear integers as to the inclusion of the
15 into the general 16 cells in the 4D matrix such that where it applies we
consider the nonnecessity of the null origin or addition.

Let us observe,
informally, the following additions and subtractions of these levels of powers
of natural integers as defining sets (still we need to find the rational in the
expansion choices of which, evidently low primes, are used and which are
repeated to multiple powers, these distinctly unique and functional sets
obeying what in arithmetic seems sound and consistent in general number
properties.):

95 +1 = 96 of which different sets of subgroups of the
monster if made as distinctions act as a measure of proximity to some aspect of
rotational subsets of lesser but included dimension groups, here four times 24.

90 + 5 = 45 where the
bicolor (hypercolor) is related to the possibilities of combing 15 colors as
abstract color vectors in these group interactive dimensions.

95 - 81 = 14 which recalls the spaces of the
associahedron, and ideas of the count of elements in a holographic surface as
well the internal center as null or two, or as gender unified and confused in
four space.

95 - 89 = 6

Nine of the primes
are taken to the first power 1 and 6 to some multiple power of which 11 is
significantly the square 2.

95 - 35 ( the 1 2 or 4 possible subgroups, here for 4) is
the reduction to the number 60 where it occurs as 5 fold symmetry.

121 - 95 is 26, and
all that number means

if we add to the 81
elements of the hypercube 2, then 83 may be thought to exist as null shadow
elements for a triality of creative objects in a centering. This number can be successively found by
loose additions and divisions.

Lastly, 95 is not
that special save it is 5 x 19.

We can privilege one
element of a group to generate a subgroup.

* * *

Would any group of
symmetries that did not distinguish its members as some hierarchy of measure no
matter what the complexity of paths and dimensions be intelligible if it were
only an abstract set at singularity?

Once this structure
is more concretely obtained then the missing numbers in a natural order unto
the maximum symmetry of the physical field in question, may in a sense
contribute as null (Rowlands metaphysical) values that influence the constrains
and evolving structure of a physical system.

* * * * * * *

Such abstract
thoughts may apply concretely to the expression and development of subjective
or the physical for organic organisms.
For such problems in that mathematics relates to our psychology, science
claiming it has no definite answers at this time for certain human behaviors,
this alternative theory may show a new direction to solve the problem and the
possibility that foundationally that science
but a hopeful monster generating hopeful monsters that science at its
ground may not find the problem without some future solution.

I have the utmost
respect for artists or even scientist that might be said to be held back or
broken in their mental development as if in fact what we consider a disease
element may be helpful for the breakthroughs for the mainstream not otherwise
found by irrational intuitive passion that seems to be part of so much
creativity. But in that I may be
considered by others a scientist or artist, we all crave role models for some
level of obtainment thru admiration including the open minded possibilities of
our own achievements even if these models are myths, I tend to judge the work
for its beauty and for the product or result of it as a work of quality. In my neighborhood I have known a few artists
of higher genius and yet it was among one of them who was a real threat to his
co-workers, it can happen anywhere.

* * * * * * *

## No comments:

## Post a Comment