Some Implications of
a Many-Sheeted Universe

*L. Edgar Otto*04 December, 2012

Numbers can seem
vague sets of things as well as vague absolute sets of things. This may reflect the nature of our inheritance where in general multiplicity for example the recent speculations
in the evolution paradigm that has us gain intelligible sentience at the cost
of hallucinatory dream state sanity- these being innate from early beginnings as a
path singularity divergence defining diversity and uniformity of a species to
which there may be actual differences in the mixing and weights of instinct,
intellect, and intuition between individuals of which to challenge the symmetry
of the situation within an individual resonates with the frontier and core
sense of reality of that individual much like the justification of being by the
Cartesian claptrap or its reversal of the phrase and the virtual or empty
compromise in the paradox or contradictions of something between mind and
matter as a mediator even in the case of Hume that may rely on the experimental
facts and debates that by thoughts or words alone can actually undermine the arguments of the opponent as a logical fallacy or not.

Thus the vagueness of
the quantum level that may strike some pragmatic people as a sort of mysticism
is a property of numbers between the horizon of balances or interchange that is
the fundamental unified state of change and integration over a natural
intelligible system to which what we experience in understanding this as
mirrors, reversals of negative values or those absolute (as I understand it
from my terse reading p-adic type theories investigate the absolute to which the
complex numbers seem to apply where they are used in mathematical physics and
philosophic logic).

To have this feel for
numbers as I present and tend to see them myself in the illustration becomes a
more certain focus than the vague numerology over the statistical grounds of
probability- to in particular pull a Newton and investigate the negative values of Pascal's triangle
extended (much as in that method we extend things to the neutral or vacuum
values of singularity states of particles and numbers.) Of course we are prone to calculation errors
that may in fact be a lapse in our state of careful problem solving and looked
for wishful results of problem solving pattern recognition that may find it yet
not necessarily a logical fallacy when in the unstable state of thinking we
return again to a clear grounding from exotic logic to the simplification of the
valid classical varieties as well this an issue between exotic physics.

Does 1 and 1
necessarily equal 2 if we may imagine something possible like this vaguely
outside and alternative and quite illogical for our usual scientific stance of
the nature of the cosmos? In my habits
of calculation much as we find tricks to check our work by hand and rearrangements,
I tended to ignore the positive and negative differences but adjusted them to
get the correct value after pressing buttons before the fact as a matter of
narrowing the ergonomics of pressing and contraction needed to correct the
errors for the sake of time and storage in memory so accessed.

Also we may press the
wrong button or leave out a step in a calculation. This too is something to consider as we
carefully and for work place safety,l inguistically, half rely on this trade off
of sanity and creative sentience. I do say that throughout such times I posted
such results, not just a typing error of calculation among various multiple
interpretations of a given number as a set in some systems context with
imagined usual properties, that the old calculator I used to check my work was
defective in the functions and connections to such buttons like the factorials,
not to mention it not deeply programmed by today's standards. So the half illusion was instructive at the
core if we take such poetic possibilities seriously while we depend ever more
on such machines.

The sort of creative
presentation I offer here today is of course a sketch of the way to be worked
out as a work in progress and any errors as such in the usual half pointless
and paradoxical statement of some authors as a caveat I adjust to say: "any errors in understanding are not the
author's own." But I meant to say
in earlier posts that we have to have a sense of the real and my experience is
that general stances of arrogance detract from the finding of the truths in our
honest enquiries, especially in the sciences, even if from some stance we over
or under estimate our own or an others states of wisdom.

*1 In a many-sheeted
universe (to more or less borrow the term from the TGD pardigm of Pitkanen
because many world and multiverse I use technically in other ways) even when number properties break down up to
the octonions, globally, these laws still hold existentially in the (quasic)
field element entities relative to each other in the same or between levels in
structured singularity arrays. Thus a
sort of indistinguishably distinguishable, a radical and ambiguous theory or one clear
but not necessarily so defined.

*2 Thus we can assign
order (or colors, symbols, shapes) to embedded element entities in their stance
of degrees of freedom that gives a potential measure of "weights" in
the interactive multidimensional (and hidden fractal like) paths for the
resulting dynamics (as permutations and half effective or expressed perturbation
or even as a non-necessary class definition of a number as prime) for string
theory states of which globally the effects of higher dimensions and the loss
of properties descend into dark or empty vacuum field unity either in an indefinite expression or to some limiting point, or both.

*3 A conformal non-necessary array as many-sheeted, immutation fixed on the physicality of
these changing sign properties of the facticity not to be free linearly or the
counter facticity of the paradoxical not free formally.

*4 Between (and I used the descriptive term
earlier epsilon-delta especially for these embedded boundaries of embedded
systems) in the dualistic and more general grids, an intrinsic material order
in these independent sets (not just a dispersal of spinor like objects the
limit of the case as a physics generalization) contiguous between the epsilon
and delta (also in a geometrical dualism projection manner) the existential
"weight" and general global airy strength or shifting (super
multi-sheet path integration of added sub-values open or closed or both) is
reflected in the relaxed integration of the field totality within these labeled
values of intrinsic elemental entities on multiple and general state
"multi teleoscoping" of the tachyon-like quasifinite thus organic system
that may logically spontaneously arise or differentiate to diverse and usually
equal immutative state sum pathways most likely an individual organism in the
natural selection mirror path mutations conserved but most likely lethal to
the organism.

*5 Terse Footnote
Observations:

*The assignment of
order may display statistics based on
general permutation properties of the various labelings.

*Certainly where
these involve negative values, absolute or relative, or complex ones beyond
that.

*Not all elemental
entities possible needs be physically present in the summations nor unique in
their weight values.

*The delta-epsilon
and the epsilon-delta as formalism may exchange senses, like at an event
horizon of that of space exchanged with time, and this formalism the squaring
or more of the concept of epsilon + delta such that as Pitkanen realizes the
Einstein paradigm can be extended into many sheet worlds, the not
mathematically but physically constant values such as h, and for some the constant
of light velocity itself, via Noether's teleology or purpose of the least
action of a photon of light over a sphere of rotation.

*Yes, synthetically
this involves the fourth power as the cell glue of the elemental entities
between them as if a simply connected 5th power or dimension of 40 in 5-space.

*In the 11-zies
sequence we can separate out the four bases of the suites of eight of the
numbers to distinguish the relative epsilon or the delta parts diffuse over a
brane or quasic grid as in the illustration of the Sudoku embedding and this a
hyper-dihedral irrational angle, small eta of Coxeter, as the next geometric
irrational after phi in the quadratic equation.

*The picture then is
of many sheets composed of many sheets and so on, a sort of quasic or
hyperquasic and fractal holographic concept of 1 or 0 or potential infinity and
of nonresistants inductively interchanged conceptually much in the Riemann
manner of his complex plane sphere mapping.
This a singularity property beyond the non-necessary concept of
multi-branes.

*The string theory
landscape of replete and thought excessive freedoms of models (the 500th power
or so) is powerful as not showing bias thus the unity in completeness of degrees of freedom in the 3, 4, 5 dimensional cases as well as low energy
(mirrored high energy) middle level or familiar physics.

*Inheritance in its
material breaking (such as in replication) is defined by some viable process of
our viriality (dualism and beyond) views (in my symbols super and preceding
subscript- damn our math notations are so inadequate!) the value symbol as two,
the square root of two, or halves where in binary the 2^R plus or minus n or 0
is the statement of many sheets observed as quasicontinua.

*Small eta squared
over the embedded topologies in hex that nine digits of the quasi-random pi and
its powers or for that matter e, both transcendental, the next nine over the
manysheets refine the accumulated values to find them explicitly. Why do we
think the bases are equal in such calculations of which the base ten cannot do
this? But in general the powers of
powers of e and pi are multisheets of these multisheets.

*The Universe is
capable of ever more complex depth and span of its total and miscellaneous
state structures, also at each state of a given slice, also with tachyon-like
dimensions and over the dimensionless aspects of the general Omnium, of these
quasi-substantial many-sheeted transcendental ordered but not necessarily
contiguous values.

*This seems true for
our theories and growing wisdom for our minds.
Implications of our ideas of entropy, oscillation model eternal
recurrences, finite or infinite stances toward and of time, persistence of a
unity over its general abstract transition as positive values moot for
creation, persistence, and annihilation of a set of entities bounded as an
individual in a general space of distinct yet absolute similarity, or the
question of what the origin or sources of the universe open or closed of real
or fictitious effects of creativity is a moot and simplified question as we face
and hold some stance on the yet unknown or still to be unknown while we see the
core importance of this stance or concept as a problem to have to address in
science given total theories of insufficient existential experimental possibilities
and insufficient generalization of our total theories of everything.

*Also it is to be
reconsidered as anomaly or analogy if we can upon these amplification effects
upward as a property of imaginary numbers to add to the familiar level of physical
effects of weights or the stone measure or the values of gravity and its
general signs to engineer such physics into our imagined speculative realities-
if such is not also a moot point of what is possible or realizable in a more
or less non-necessary quasifinite universe.

*The stance toward sparsity as creative conversion of vacuum into mass as in the steady state
theory in the excitement of those more simple times given the span of that
forerunner of the now golden age of cosmology and particle physics reminds me
also of Hoyle's statement following the Big Bang background radiation evidence
to which even he tried to further dispute as if some physical and substantial
particle was the cause (his iron whiskers in space or today's wimps and so
on...) in his book on Quasars: "The
universe is not so much the result of a big bang but a lot of little
bangs..." This the underlying
concept which quasics and TGD shares as well as those who developed the art of
fractals.

*We have the freedom
thus ability to find unity within our ideas and connect deep things in our
theories and yet what guarantee these a pointless pursuit where all such are
possible in any thought out form or where all might be revised via the physics
of the past, the source wellspring of the present mangled in return or not from
the nothingness, or that this creative property within us may never find
perfection (the world as intelligible and the desired myth in those of us who
hold life as a positive value that our uniqueness makes sense of the idea of our
best of possible worlds especially in the becoming and finding wisdom and our
selves), we driving on yet asleep awhile and not aware of it in our mental
subspace as we interpolate wishful unity to fill in the natural lapses in the
whole. I am therefore I am evidently is
tenable but not enough, creative intelligent design with small letters as Hoyle
uses it seems a little more real as we take some stand in the world from the
Olympia of our exulted yet paradoxically mundane physics.

* * * * * * *

## No comments:

## Post a Comment