**The Structural Basis of Tachyon-like Ghost Particles (Omnions as the General Theory)**

**13 December, 2012**

*L. Edgar Otto*
Concerning real and
virtual ghosts, mirrors and shadows of dimensionless scale, in concrete
design:

Many abstract physics ideas can be based on
ordinary analogies, water drop models and fluid flow, potassium permanganate on
freezing in water forming a ball, for
example when theoreticians expand the concepts into higher models.

Our standard model
evidence from the LHC is interpreted today to deny higher generations of
particle than the three but this in effect not only denies supersymmetry but
the very idea of higher dimensions, perhaps even the fourth as part of our
physical description of the universe.
This is after all the result of the attempt to define and add mass via
the Higgs-like mechanism. I find it not
surprising that the question of matter to antimatter asymmetry remains a
mystery as well the idea that as a foundational and concrete particle it can
have uncertainty in the measure (a recent comment in the science magazine today).

The existing
cosmology and the standard particle theory go hand in hand to present a unified
view of today's science and its methods supporting a dogma while in different
areas of research. But in a unified or
Omnium certainly there are echos of what are deeper foundations of general
theory.

Concrete is not a bad
concept or simple word to use as a departure point of analogous theory. Water expands most things, but in concrete
the effect is to harden the material. Yet, if we add aluminum particles as a
catalyst the concrete will rise as if bread and can be carved easily.

In the viriality,
certainly from a three dimensional basis, the 12 particles in the article as a
material physicality of the generations (not known why there is that number,
ultimately) with Diracian algebra, physics primary as Rowlands holds in
principle. This duality principle seems
to justify the use of doubling certain patterns in the observed real and
positive concrete physics. This sort of
duplication or halving as if inverse mirrors and compliment modeling has deeper
basis if indeed it can be legitimately used in all cases. These after all seems tricks or artifacts of
change of sign or the mirroring in entanglement contained over a natural span
for positions only found by reasoning in complex number spaces.

We do the best we can
with our given principles and language and I have complained that if those
languages are rigid and closed, the way we use
groups and dimensions in our general theories, our intuition has
surpassed them. I myself in the desire to learn and communicate have fallen
into the straitjacket of such terminology when unaware we do so, and that the
system then tells us nothing really.
What passes for new theory at the mixing of terms is not new other than
the cleaver mixing of empty terms in a new way.

So the old vision of
the General structure of the Universe on all its scales as the model fits does
resist the rise to the wisdom of it as unifying and wide physical description
if I cling to the material grounding with such terms.

In the classical
physics, as in a game of pool, the cue ball being of smaller radius than the
numbered balls is the origin of uncertainty in the play of the game. While it works on some grounding level, aids
finer calculations, the idea of a field as a vacuum (well one virtual also) by fluctuation that can materialize entities is not deep enough- such as that of
quantum physics or the Higgs field concept.
But can in this Wobble Virality (that is the halving and doubling of
things like groups and paths and dimensions, or some power set multiple with
additions or subtractions, number mixing of the oddness or evenness, of powers
as dimensions or those as if nature presents an inverse of dimensions, even of
time like dimensions in the symmetry, roots and squares and so on...) can such
entities or substance, form and process, arise quasi-randomly from the vacuum
by such wobble virality?

If we can double or
half things we can have ghostly planes or branes of real and virtual (perhaps
dark matter and energy as a very analogous concept occurring lately to many
serious or armchair physicists, speculative philosophy and science fiction
writers) so to relate these to oscillating patterns including ideas of clashing
branes or other oscillating wave universe models, why not shadow points or branes between those
considered more material and concrete?
In the general hierarchy of continua, and of higher spans of numbers in
theory, the sort of classical radius as
of an electron, or wobbling muon, (tauons?) of which the wobble may tell us of
the existence of parallel universes if we could see that accurately a single
electron, may also explain in familiar scale models a measure as if mass, a
grounding that can be so described as classical uncertainty.

So too the
observation of a photon of light which over the time since the big bang on a
foundational level seems not to have changed significantly, save of course the possibilities
of the emphasis of physics on the shifting and the color directions of the
shift, and apparently a path change that we take as evidence, as indirect as
our observing the Higgs, of the vaster sea of dark matter.

What is the
statistics here, random as a factor or perhaps that on a higher scale of
symmetries we do not yet see and barely imagine, if we can see them? In these quasifinite and quantum distortions
can we make deeper distinctions between the old idea of chaos and those of
chaoscience in terms of perhaps a higher idea of uncertainty in principle?

A set of classical
spheres is a useful model for calculation also that is confined to a sphere or
its general and parallel structure but it is concrete, solid as obvious and not
considered from the real material point as negative- yet it can be subject to
some random forces or become vanished. In medicine the question of the radius
of cholesterol comes up also as important as to how the system of the organism
reacts to it naturally including these as source of disorganization at the
frontier of our disease rather that result of this classical idea of such
spheres and radii.

It is not clear what
the Higgs is in the LHC discovery for it can be argued as a lesser particle,
confused with its own multiplicity manyworlds or parallel, if the universe were
modeled like the Higgs then it confused with multiverse. Or it can be something
greater such as my own necessary working limitation of terminology asking if
the LHC has discovered the quason, a more general and advanced idea among
others from the alternative theoreticians (some of these thankfully have ideas
which will prove concrete that nevertheless have principles that likely apply
yet remain outside or recognition of significance such as

*galatomic*theory which turns time on its head and involved consciousness in a great growing procession if we must make the distinction between the matter and the spirit.)
But I make the leap
beyond myself to what I have already stated as paradoxically general in my own
terms. What the LHC has discovered can
be even higher than the quason and its maximum three space atom
symmetries. In the need to coin a new
term that of Omnion logically follows although I considered a few other terms:
brigade-on, phiphoton, zionon, and most significantly, Casmiron... Phi, the golden ratio, is in the idea as
irrational limitation over a span of space (what I recently called the
grounding for a quasifinite asymptotic freedom as a strong force principle-
also chromosome fields and their interaction in one organism).

This omnium as
particle (iota, point ray) I here conceive as a series of squares of power as
if our idea of photon bundle but it is like the pressure between and on
structures around them of plates that show the Casmir force (hence dark energy)
on the microscopic scale. Only these are
plates of branes and virtual branes as if a stacking of cubes to form a general
octahedron, the antiorthogons, of which
the omnion is such a bundle an to which the symmetries of a cube and the lower
ones of its component simplexes (tetrahedra) may be divided and compared in the
abstract and evidently relative and asymmetric motion. The geometry of the Higgs as Omnion is a very
complicated but intelligible singularity, and its isolation as well as
interactions to other bundles does ground some of our uses and methods in our
dealing with groups and dimensions, meaning and information.

From the arithmetic
we add such properties of counting the things in the branes, single or doubled
or not, and the branes themselves, and higher symmetries of the ghost count of
such things, the looping in five fold duality of honeycomb Euclidean
dimensions, for the total and intelligible count of these multilevel but
coherently relating branes themselves of which the relation to gravity if any
is existentially or in a quasic span interval transverse and longitudinal in
everlasting abstract ineligible counts where expressed as geometry.

* * * * *

## No comments:

## Post a Comment