* * *
So too Lubos in his usefulness in some future of the string theories. For what I propose had a moment of epiphany of the sixteen places in the 4 space matrix of his ten as assumed at rest and possibly interpreted as gravitational and the six as electromagnetic thus a magic square unification of which today this array is to the higher symmetries as perhaps we regard the squares and square roots of multilayers intelligibly connected to classical mouths or wormholes or not, as we regard the diagonals of matrices so to show the forces and physics.
Let us not get sick over our fading assets, but let us also never give up the idealism hidden in our expectations. I can comfort another, commensurate, decry and say desist to those who test them to the point of breaking- and we will find a way that our small voices they put to the side of editorials branding the role in the essential free speech exception will make a difference after all. All you gods of theory as the reach to some Olympia, we look around in the best of times and worst of times and find our king among the gypsy dancers and the hunchbacks- we should be careful whom we pour down through the gargoyles the hot oil in defense of the cathedral.
In response to reading Pikanen's post attempt to awaken us to the TGD vision:
This post is an excellent attempt at trying to communicate these frontier ideas. I downloaded it in hard copy of 8 pages and read it carefully. If you are interested in my impressions where we may share some evolution in our approaches I have stated it there.
Professors, like Hoyle when I had tea with him- well he said students are always coming to him to comment on their theories-of course we talked about other things, down to earth and I mentioned supporting him briefly if I did not have other directions but certainly not the new Big Bang cosmology.
Still feel free to comment on my system if I have in discussing yours made it a little easier- then you can get down to maybe something more useful from my own.
I mentioned the Scientific American article ulla had posted in facebook- there was a time when I did break from just those two ways to apply and see dimensions and it was an awakening moment.
I think your more careful formal approach is much more difficult than freely allowing the intuition and poetic magic to flow.
But where you say you cannot understand some things even in the asking clearly that is an achievement and perhaps some things in the context were not an error (holographic stuff and surfaces for example) but the context is such an error.
As to why the advanced culture of Finnish science does not support your project that is like some form of economics it would take another Gauss to begin to phantom although I made meager suggestions.
All in all a great posting, thank you. I do wish I had the training in the exponential type notations but perhaps they slow us down.
The Pe Sla
* * * * *