Saturday, December 15, 2012
Uniform Synaethesia Colour Space
Uniform Synaethesia Colour Space
L. Edgar Otto 15 December, 2012
I present here mainly information in the forms of the illustrations. While we may imagine hidden and higher systems of pure color what I intuitively see here and come to focus on is the quasifinite or continuous and discrete ranges of color regions of combinatorial and subsystems. If some if this is not known in the literature in some form then there are a lot of ways we can expand recreational mathematics or mathematical physics.
Certainly some of these core principles and processes have their echos in such studies... relevant or deeply but distantly connected ideas or not the Soma cube is a way to represent and explore some of these issues of symmetry and quantum mechanics where it begins as structural foundations.
Somewhere outside the closure and unity of our concepts, the quasimetaphysical otherness and paradoxes of the looping of time we should question our thinking on the obvious to deeper levels. Why would we regard some object flying through space as unnatural if it makes an instant shift to a right angle direction? Such orthogonal considerations may not be completely described in their twists and turns by our intelligible complex number ideas.
A quasifinite system should then distinguish nonnecessary systems that so describe abrupt changes of the right or the linear straight angles directed or not, real or virtually mirrored or not. While we may choose discrete colors over the idea of grounding prime ones, relative or absolute or beyond the absolute in our imagining of other systems so implied, do we not suggest that the colors we perceive may be changed in the continuous context of say stars with a greater gravitational field?
In the abstract or quasic motions and the informational changes of coordinates, compliments or mirrored or not, or even half the infinity which is after all an ambiguity of counting much like what happens if we reason two photons traveling in opposite directions double the maximum velocity and all such displacement is an illusion that meets the same problem as to what happens in entanglement as to the nature of the parity and chirality of particle objects. These are part of a more general theory also to which the real physical distinctions need no longer confuse our physics theorists in their fine calculations and modeling or say the debates as to definitive proofs or not as in Bell's theorem and its seemingly experimental if not rational verification.
At the extremes of folding or unstacking the tetracubes with the non distinction of what is superimposed (what ground the unity or distinction, the invasive or not of magnetic fields on the human brain) are after all the issue of finite circles or lines we can imagine in motion or still, finite or infinite in rest or speed. The arranging of the parts into the 3^3 cube of the 24 as 6 sets of four of them leaves the three (which I have designated as wild card jokers to the various interactive groups and dimension representations) leaves a trionimo of three cubes to which in the flat space matrix we may count as superimposed cubes to be added or subtracted from the general concreteness of material space.
The arrangement of these cubes in the trionomo may be diagonal across the cube, the total number of soma solutions seem equal as constructable either as a 3x1 or 1+1+1 piece even diagonally (of an abstract quasic motion thru a point) as well as the motion thru a face. But we do then observe the logic that prevents changes or changes the representations of field array parity or the handiness and color of tetraominos in the sense they are mirrored not just in the simple information of entanglement as the issues of four fold space.
I have not investigated the motions through an edge but would conjecture the general theory holds intelligibly. But in higher space systems, just as the Magi Queens and Unicorn Knights from the logical extension and labeling of combinations of the n-chess games perhaps this is a way to better extend our differences of partial or multiple integration especially as these apply to our description of entropy.
In the complication of multiple, fractal-like stereonomerty systems presented by consciousness as if a substance it seems clear that the ambiguity of superposition and the count and structure at foundational singularities adds a place to act as if a wider hidden physical influence of which we find room for the self or soul at lest in our existential living- but we cannot show such positions, the jokers in the deck and the wild card, are full or not even while identity between competing subjective systems (such as neuron-net artificial intelligence dominating regions toward some unity of state conclusions) could lead, even if it magical thinking in our development as learning, to our strange idea of possession.
I leave you with this (Metaphysical?) poem of John Donne called A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning 1633 for I feel I can see into the frame of thought in his mind in that time- but I leave it to the reader to decide if his mind was sound.
Our two souls, therefore, which are one,
Though I must go, endure not yet
A breach, but an expansion,
Like gold to airy thinness beat.
If they be two, they are two so
As stiff twin compasses are two;
Thy soul, the fixed foot, makes no show
To move, but doth, if th'other do.
And though it in the centre sit,
Yet when the other far doth roam,
It leans and hearkens after it,
And grows erect as that comes home.
Such wilt thou be to me, who must
Like th'other foot obliquely run;
Thy firmness makes my circle just
And makes me end where I begun.
* * * * * * *