Uniform Synaethesia
Colour Space

*L. Edgar Otto*15 December, 2012

I present here mainly
information in the forms of the illustrations.
While we may imagine hidden and higher systems of pure color what I
intuitively see here and come to focus on is the quasifinite or continuous and
discrete ranges of color regions of combinatorial and subsystems. If some if this is not known in the
literature in some form then there are a lot of ways we can expand recreational
mathematics or mathematical physics.

Certainly some of
these core principles and processes have their echos in such studies... relevant or deeply but distantly connected ideas or not the Soma cube is a way
to represent and explore some of these issues of symmetry and quantum mechanics
where it begins as structural foundations.

Somewhere outside the
closure and unity of our concepts, the quasimetaphysical otherness and
paradoxes of the looping of time we should question our thinking on the obvious
to deeper levels. Why would we regard
some object flying through space as unnatural if it makes an instant shift to a
right angle direction? Such orthogonal
considerations may not be completely described in their twists and turns by our
intelligible complex number ideas.

A quasifinite system
should then distinguish nonnecessary systems that so describe abrupt changes of
the right or the linear straight angles directed or not, real or virtually
mirrored or not. While we may choose
discrete colors over the idea of grounding prime ones, relative or absolute or
beyond the absolute in our imagining of other systems so implied, do we not
suggest that the colors we perceive may be changed in the continuous context of
say stars with a greater gravitational field?

In the abstract or
quasic motions and the informational changes of coordinates, compliments or
mirrored or not, or even half the infinity which is after all an ambiguity of
counting much like what happens if we reason two photons traveling in opposite
directions double the maximum velocity and all such displacement is an illusion
that meets the same problem as to what happens in entanglement as to the nature
of the parity and chirality of particle objects. These are part of a more general theory also
to which the real physical distinctions need no longer confuse our physics
theorists in their fine calculations and modeling or say the debates as to definitive proofs or not as in Bell's theorem and its seemingly experimental if
not rational verification.

At the extremes of
folding or unstacking the tetracubes with the non distinction of what is
superimposed (what ground the unity or distinction, the invasive or not of
magnetic fields on the human brain) are after all the issue of finite circles
or lines we can imagine in motion or still, finite or infinite in rest or
speed. The arranging of the parts into
the 3^3 cube of the 24 as 6 sets of four of them leaves the three (which I have
designated as wild card jokers to the various interactive groups and dimension
representations) leaves a trionimo of three cubes to which in the flat space
matrix we may count as superimposed cubes to be added or subtracted from the
general concreteness of material space.

The arrangement of
these cubes in the trionomo may be diagonal across the cube, the total number
of soma solutions seem equal as constructable either as a 3x1 or 1+1+1 piece even
diagonally (of an abstract quasic motion thru a point) as well as the motion
thru a face. But we do then observe the
logic that prevents changes or changes the representations of field array
parity or the handiness and color of tetraominos in the sense they are mirrored
not just in the simple information of entanglement as the issues of four fold
space.

I have not
investigated the motions through an edge but would conjecture the general
theory holds intelligibly. But in
higher space systems, just as the Magi Queens and Unicorn Knights from the
logical extension and labeling of combinations of the n-chess games perhaps
this is a way to better extend our differences of partial or multiple
integration especially as these apply to our description of entropy.

In the complication
of multiple, fractal-like stereonomerty systems presented by consciousness as if a
substance it seems clear that the ambiguity of superposition and the count and
structure at foundational singularities adds a place to act as if a wider hidden
physical influence of which we find room for the self or soul at lest in our
existential living- but we cannot show such positions, the jokers in the deck
and the wild card, are full or not even while identity between competing
subjective systems (such as neuron-net artificial intelligence dominating regions
toward some unity of state conclusions) could lead, even if it magical thinking
in our development as learning, to our strange idea of possession.

I leave you with this
(Metaphysical?) poem of John Donne called

*A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning*1633 for I feel I can see into the frame of thought in his mind in that time- but I leave it to the reader to decide if his mind was sound.
Our two souls,
therefore, which are one,

Though I must go,
endure not yet

A breach, but an
expansion,

Like gold to airy
thinness beat.

If they be two, they
are two so

As stiff twin
compasses are two;

Thy soul, the fixed
foot, makes no show

To move, but doth, if
th'other do.

And though it in the
centre sit,

Yet when the other
far doth roam,

It leans and hearkens
after it,

And grows erect as
that comes home.

Such wilt thou be to
me, who must

Like th'other foot
obliquely run;

Thy firmness makes my
circle just

And makes me end
where I begun.

* * * * * * *

## No comments:

## Post a Comment