**Journal Omnium**

**16 January, 2013**

*L. Edgar Otto**"In the quinidad of the godhead the ti-cornered snowflake of the world rejects the virgin and the sphere dream, these in hidden space feel the bond of love and do the creative work of lovers..."*The PeSla

We can see physics
more clearly if we can see the ideas of physicality and its intimacy with the
vacuum as quasicity more clearly.

The simple count over
the intelligible geometric, algebraic or group structures follows a consistent
mathematics where what we emphasize of a system finds its unities and parallels.

The count may
consider the paths so ordered as extensions of the Z quasic ordering across the
orthogons in the natural dimensions where in the low dimensions at least as our
world so appears as material. Both in
its nodes and one dimensional paths as the cube is not fundamental- thus the
simplex from a corner as if the origin of a quasic brane or the exclusion of
merged gluon groups has a wider vacuum influenced (transitive over methods from
an edge up to a symmetric space structure).
In that the tetrahedron is fundamental if irreducible to a given
dimension it is self dual as so is the 24 cell in four space to organize wider
systems of physics. These respect simple
number theory.

By self-dual we
understand "viriality" that can double a set of points or edges or can
merge them. 12 to 24, yet in the case
where we have one face as if the two faces not unfolded nor of a Moebious sense
of things beyond some existential stance, the doubling of 24 into 48 for each
face becomes again the 24 as if the totality of possibilities from one origin
of the group multiplication of them. But
this duality does not restrict the interrelation of such abstract groups that
as a general theory will seem not to exist or at least be hidden.

The Quasicalulus
stands in complimentary or contradiction to the Surreal calculus intuitively,
but there is a fundamental theory of the Omnicalculus in that there is an
anti-surreal calculus such that (in matters that the quadratic formalism over a
plane or brane follows the transitivity of corner hierarchical count) that
abstractly suggests it is the integers that we can see as if irrational
numbers. Or as in quantum theory we do not have an adequate explanation as to why
some physics is integer in ratios where in the general probability of things
each point on a number line can be transcendental let alone irrational in the
transfinite count.

It is important to
keep the generational quasic field power set wild card elements even if
abstract in mind where in the development or evolution of objects and events in
the world we find a consistence and thus grounds for coherence that seems in
its ultimate nonnecessity of design as intelligibly related. Of course at some existential unity every
finite group has a corresponding infinite group, but the idea of what is finite
as a power continuum from the Omirror view of the universe may be inversed or
fixed a little to soon in our interpretations.

The clarity of
quasics, again, implies and implements (motives?) the clarity of physics. But these intuitively developed ideas once
understood should not be a stepping stone on which the foundations as unifying
are to be forgotten,

In the 8 cubes BOG we
may regard these as 8 cube or 4 pairs at the diagonal (a change of all the relevant coordinate constant or by a mirror or at the merging variable) as
those of at least the face cube cells of a hypercube. In particular where we
have nodes of subcells at a point, here three edges to the corner, we can have
20 arise as well as 24 from the faces in a color notation and count. This seems to be favored one way or another
by those applying it to genetics.

This unity in the
comprehension and awareness of these ideas especially where they are still
confusions among those in the field, thus the problem even with simple
solutions can take a long time even if no generalization is guaranteed or a
unity forthcoming of diverse elements in a general opened or closed system
seems a very satisfying development for my personal quest of theories- I hope,
but maybe as vaguely so as it seems in the hints of unity and discovery by the
really average working scientist to which society may not support or understand
the deep need for the discipline, that
those working in astrophysics or the colliders do make some breakthru
discoveries by their emphasis on statistical methods- which of course we should
not ignore philosophically either or in it dismiss other inquiry systems.

This, trivially, there
are 15 or 30 color matching cubes of six (and two wildcard merged remote) times
the structural binary environs these are so embedded in as physical (not dark)
space. Waves behave within this contiguity of ordered information also at a simplex level. While it is said "we understand the
infinite but the finite will take us a little while longer" we see that
where such mathematics is that of the contiguity (as nonnecessarlily the case
yet not forbidden) has taken us a little while longer still.

The Omirror (O for
omnium or even null) is thus not necessarily itself a Brane, the Obrane in the
usual sense of the technical terms. But
such is the case through conceptual themes of recursion and hierarchy, let us
not depend so much on the formalism of polar coordinates and the complex
numbers in planes only, this is but a quasi-identity of identities, all empty or
all replete and full. In the quantum
theory did we not first think of the possibilities of fractional dimensions-
and ask in it where is the chaos science?
But such methods, conceptions in context and independently gives us the
freedom of wider and more concrete answers as these raised questions loops from
them and develops.

The omnium world view
has important applications to the sensibility of our states and society to
which while we may look forward we also can sense the frustration of a
primitive age. Not the least of this
question of privacy and freedom and trust in ourselves is the personal evolving
as we depend so much on our animal nature into higher forms of what is a more
abundant architecture that grounds by focused privileging of unique necessity
otherwise lost in the expanse of paths in this world and the experience while
vital and alive to memory or its access with others new states of our spirit in
the here or in the hereafter (if those terms are still a little vague in our
contemplations where the Omnium is not the ultimate last word as the theory of
everything.

The general problem
from the recreational standpoint of the actual drawing of the 30 cubes as they
match in the Otto-Conway like Abrane matrices tho difficult is implied in
principle and does involve the parallel hyper-superposition of high values of
binary numbers unto a simplification, so too the haunting yet intelligible
generation of shapes as in the Soma cube like puzzles from consideration of
inversions. The consideration of these
informational partitions of axial numbers may extend our theories into what
happens between those of endpoints or origins we understand as a powerful yet
incomplete theory.

I am not clear on
what Conway meant by "non standard" sets to explore by Mahon's cube
matching theory unless his square face matrix is considered somehow standard,
or does he too see a profound extension into such theories of space
possibilities having long been familiar with thinking in 24 dimensions? Clearly a "compacton" has at
least 36 or 2^6 bits of information
(quasibits) but things like the possible coloring of the edges of even an
ordinary cube needs not be too vast that it is beyond our simplified count,
labels and calculation.

* * * * * * *

## No comments:

## Post a Comment