Vulcan, Xena and
Gabriel, and Other Flying Dutchmen
L. Edgar Otto Friday, 25 January, 2013
In the outer ring of
the sun in the debris of confusion, the Oort belt, Pluto dethroned as a planet
or by size to come back again periodically, all such classical radii a matter
of refinement and debate, we find orbs
like Eris as much a ghost of our theoretical dreams to view, test our ideas of
dark matter.
Even as an airy spark
some say their super-particles, twice ghostly, are designated with names that
speak for our universe so close to holding to the idea of dust, so the fanciful
gravino and the graviton- this correct in the spirit of it but still not a
surprise to the new philosophy- not so much a radical idea although a radical
effort of speculation in what seems in our cautious climb a breakthru, new
idea.
Yet in the general
scheme of super-particles that they underlay the fabric of the world, half real,
half dreams of abstraction, ghostly the balances of equations of momentum
beginning with neutrinos, the design mechanism, the dynamics, would not work to
so describe if such particles could explicitly be seen, SUSY verified - that
world would be outside the scope of our present inquiry in a sea of yin-yang of
the general Omnium, system open yet closed, moving yet still.
But it is simply not
for the credit or gifts of discovery and discoverers that we embellish some
structure with our own sense of design and names, nor the drive for legacy and
the meaning of life if that means much over wider time spans, the ideas
distinct in what we glen of some design and how we may think of them. Our names and symbols endure, we aware of
them or not, more than about anything else, not even our institutions, says
Santayana. In these brave and golden
times in retrospect of science or perhaps what seems its swan song, what is the
difference to the design structure and the Zen like embellishment of the gifted
dishwasher, Wilbur, or that of the Diracian doubled arrays of the complex
number natural codes by Rowlands?
Certainly we can
extend, at least in our reasoning, the analogies to simpler spaces while
knowing what is but imagined on the frontier if we are clear and careful
thinkers, such thoughts not abandoned to philosophies of chaos, luck. Octonions arise as some idea of limits, the
awakening of hypernumbers of positive roots of one that is not one- why not ask
then of the roots of imaginary numbers beyond what seems a reasonable extension
of the fact of logical form, the quasic quartering of possibilities, that are
not necessarily an imaginary number, so to for the idea of null and nilpotency
and its mirrors beyond infinity? Alas,
in the fundamental theorem that things change yet remain the same on what can
we base such a limit, on what aether may we define or experience reaction to
our action? An uncharacterized universe
in a sense weightless.
Sometimes, for awhile
at least, there is a Vulcan to be seen, and in the indifferent purposes of this
world, of action and causation, a real particle such as a comment to which it is
a synchronous coincidence over some range to which we get results but really do
not find foundational some perturbations.
The unseen supersymmetry does have its principle of potential contiguity yet division of such real effects.
In the idea of what is forgotten before the Big Bang a mechanism may so
be described that experience is passed on thru some nonnecessary realm of what
our forefathers at a distance learned in their colors, marks and symbols as if
magic in the synaethesia that begs for imprints behind an infants smile should
we grow wiser as a species.
The chemists and the
neurologists hope to find some ghostly magic bullet so reassure them of real
ground, but that proves nothing anymore than the coincidence of what we try to
measure in probabilities, that we more readily learn a human traditional
language in the teleology, in the resolution of the chicken or the egg, than in
a new and artificial design. Can such be
observed or scanned tho the brain in its geometry does partition its parts
intelligibly?
If one of our
interpretations is that of charge as fundamental, or any such ideas on what is
the substance of a force say distinct from gravity that eludes us, and if the
insights of Einstein stand then we have also a higher relativity, we call this Exxene
physics by the way, this as he knew an incomplete unification to which, beyond
the political stance and myths of genius, the logic of it makes a target that
so many ask if he was wrong- this I offer to explain the why always Einstein so
challenged asks my chat friend on the science forum who works in Fermi lab.
Can we not see, or at
least deny, a higher equivalence principle on this issue of what is at rest of
what in SUSY space (and by now my readers should realize this sort of space a
given, a priori, and not really opened to debate despite the dearth of proofs
by discovery) if we are to probe deeper into the physics and metaphysics of the
standard theory, charge itself on this level has its weightless falling that is
acceleration. Beyond this what is
something at rest so seen on this level full of zero points and
singularities? Charge then a working
hypothesis and an embellishment.
I concur with
Churchman, having independently found such design structures myself, that there
is a forth and fifth box (indeed a generalization that seems open and closed
beyond these). What I think this amounts
to in the new philosophy is that beyond Mechanism, Chance, and Teleology we add
at least two others, as with this structure method in the new physics,
Tachyonics, then Transcendence to the frontier of what are the possibilities of design structure beyond the Omnium if there is such a place. But this has to exceed the intelligibility of
our current mathematics if possible that it is not a loop to the same design
structure in reality and theory as an unresolvable case.
For at the
existential core of things as we see them, experience and experiment with them
physically and subjectively, Aristotle's
and Plato's stance still suggest there may be some unity in principle between
what we see as that contained or what is as if some real or reversed idea of
action directed out from our own singularity center.
This idea perhaps
grounds our intuitions on gravity, and thus the higher form we interpret as
charge and even mass, that direction aside, the logic of what three things
together by be conserved or combined two by two, or how we feel these can
somewhere be unified without contradiction, sometimes, while we fall into a
black hole without noticing the change of horizons, the identities of our own
projected or parallel similarities or differences, we find a hint of hidden or magical
unification.
But these abstract
motions between things in the general structure can be described by our
existing mathematics even if we have to assume for the same of the idea of
balancing series and equations that beyond the surface mirror ground is half
real or unreal. That is true of the
applications of groups and the count, as well that in one dimension of rest it
can be a quasifinite or discrete motion in adjacent natural dimensions.
The ideology of the
day does seem to color its times as in the golden age of feminility as a
philosophy and its one sided application to the core idea of gender and species
evolving discernible indiscernible ground states of differences. Other groups may desire to break thu the
certainty found at the tachyonic box to which chaos theory suppresses
effectively any such usurpation of mutations, the age old comparison on a
philosophic level of the diversity of the right or left hands in our bilateral
symmetry.
We then find the
usual partisan division that claims the out groups as part of the same
unification movement in diversity while denying their own double gender or
double chromosome drive as resulting in the philosophy making them still the out-group to suppress into the evolved consensus as only dogmatic truth of whole
teleological creatures into its organizational outreach and hegemony. This by nature not suspected to last save that
those who imagine it may not and take or just find, the opportunity to extend
the life of it in the moment.
But Xena and Gabriel,
from that show of our powerful amazon warriors if they can handle the tests for
the expediency of combat, to that end the removal and great ritual of sacrifice
of their breast so to carry their arrows, two lovers by the swampy lagoon
waters in respite and mock replication from the world and its wars, from the
judgements unto equal opportunity in paradox with the hierarchies and ceilings
of glass, containers still sensitive to touch holding hands like school girls
thought nothing of where the slap on the rear of quarterbacks is accepted in the
name of war and power games and other prisons.
I would have preferred
those names for the exoplanets even though it is dated to a time and
classically replaced by words still long forgotten and unclear in the
collective memory of dating... we could not have extended the periodic table of
elements with just the planet names- and the great saints of science so honored
become just touchstone names the personalities forgotten- so many gravestones
so little family living history. Flying Dutchman is romantic too and keeps raw
friction innocent and virginal. But to
continue the elements with mere numbers only and not the wealth of names, that
is not what my system of numbers should be seen to do.
By sea of yin-yang I
mean a sea of singularities with symmetry.
We while intensely alive and creative do not quite resign ourselves to a
limited, quasifinite, and identity vanishing life space...and in the face of a
wider design generalization of philosophy and physics some explanation or
intuition say of what is God or heaven with a little "h" in its rise
of mind in possibly measurable intelligence in a universe diverse and pregnant
with creativity set in motion toward the new and some end again, the rebirth of
passion, these do not necessarily satisfy us, we creatures still with great
promise and in that sense open ultimately and incomplete.
* * * * * * *
No comments:
Post a Comment