Of
Time and the Omnium
(Creative
Philosophy and Science beyond a Fifth Vital Force)
L.
Edgar Otto 12
January, 2013
Perhaps
the reason I wax philosophic today was the focusing of my thought
relating two different articles in science daily relevant to the
scope of my foundational theories- the idea of a way (phonons) to
transmit heat as if light on the micro scale and the idea of using
matter waves from a single particle to measure time. I should
probably add the two that come from astronomy, how the density of
clouds do not necessarily result in clumping to star formation and
that there are very large regions of clusters of quasars- I imagined
it more crystalline and diffuse, still quasars as creative objects
are not primary but part of a hierarchy of creative principles. The
appeal as stated by Hoyle in reaction to evidence of the Big Bang
cosmology- quasars as evidence of not one big bang but a lot of
little bangs (I wonder how this in our day would be seen in relation
to particle generations and the ongoing issues of the creation of or
immortality or irreducible protons?).
Also
I have time and feel like writing but with nothing really in mind to
write about, certainly with less a sense of urgency and maybe lesser
desire to engage or communicate these pursuits in debate, explicitly
and directly anyway.
In
the distinction where time is intimate to mass as viriality, although
the philosophic sense of it may be seen as well as if the fourth
dimension thus instability of these symmetric mirror relations, we
may suggest that physical time is at least a property of particle
generations over some span of space.
Up
to three generations isometry can reduce to a question of vibration,
moreover these may be contained in nets of shadow space wherein heat
is transferred with them as boundaries, independent or a relation
within the omnium of a dependency as if entropy equivalent to a
measure of this general time including disorder of coordinates where
fixed as concrete or in definite intrinsic linear motion.
But
the general structure that gives rise to the replete generation of
particles is a quasic geometry also to generate the generations.
Nevertheless, space or material structures may exist as closed or
looped entities, and thus as creative entities atomic like and fixed
in at least implied patterns.
Thus
in the nonnecessity of the matter there is quasisometry by which in contiguity creative patterns will clump as a matter of hierarchies
where it seems this is uniform as laws of physics where on a flat comprehensive brane we may divide it into sub-squares without gaps
save the distinctions between generations (forces) of contiguity and
in the extension into three space we cannot so stack or divide
systems of analogous cubes- save as the constructions possible where
they relate to concrete rigid lengths of the power of space in
question with at least the golden ratio.
Yet,
it seems if we go into the depth, as if in a quasar internal region,
or of whatever creative object, the core laws of physics across the
universe may appear locally distinct. This is not a matter of the
infitesimal as the source of amplification as observed in the
electromagnetic forces where we deduce things ultimately from the
complex plane or its analogies.
The
source motives express the driving force for this amplification as
well the source quasic generations as part of a wider stereonometry
as universal law. Gravity is not so much a leaking into compactified
entities of stings that do not loop in one type of space or the other
to the idea of differences in natural dimensions as it is the general
boundary conditions in this generalization that is always the next
wildcard of generality.
I
continue to find it an open question as to if there is an ultimate
source, or an ultimate point of teleology- certainly the argument by
perfection does not necessarily hold not the raw question of what
exists or why it does rather than not also. Nor in a wider sense if,
as in our projection of what may be the ultimate ends or origins of
the universe the source and the omega omnium end as teleology meet as
the same created and creative entity. Teleology and its counters
thus philosophically not enough to prove or disprove the existence of
or our idea of God.
The
meaning and information in its distinct forms of a universe as given,
singular or in plurality, is quasi-source and quasi-teleology as the
foundational inquiring system. We cannot say that any subsystem, especially without these ideas of mirrors and generations, at least
as ineligible in the recapitulation if not the causation of
patterns, the analog or the discrete in the existing span of
contiguity and pattern, which in a design of a theory of everything
amounts to moving meaningless objects around and in the doing so find
no consequence as information or meaning useful or not- and within
the existing while the laws are intelligible we may not be able save
in the shadow imagination as if creative analogs on some level
determine the foundational laws of the universe, uniform or not, from
design, only quasi-meaningful or just asserted so our resulting
pattern.
Still,
the shifting between generational patterns are useful for our
experience of being in existing or becoming across and between
generations, or in our sense of a relaxed view of our thus
quasi-experiments and perhaps quasi-consciousness as a grounding of
some span of accuracy of measure.
Our
imagination of a most distant star (or of a creative entity) or of
that in the utmost depth as if quasinfinite generations, that we also
stand on some horizon as the concrete where being seems
(quasintuitively) the source itself of what is given at least in the
moment remains an open question of our self reflection universally, existentially as nothingness, or as the core of potential or
quasi-creativity.
As
such this itself may seem the meaningful ongoing source of our desire
to inquire, to learn, and to imagine in hope the transcendence from
the universal law as we understand it generally, is possible, even
after the paradoxes of vanishing or the ghosts of departed divisions
focused to the remote over wider generational time as if perfection
could go beyond the given as if being returns to such a place as a
goal, and ever remote could be but a new beginning of even higher
universal laws.
We
may not necessarily exceed the omnium in the sense of a refined
utmost particle as a single instance with high resolution of
observation, or the experiments of interaction of them with more than
a mechanical test in mind, determine explicitly all dimensions
considered, if our general universe can be said to be multiple, or if
so that fact even in abstract reasoning explicitly observable in
resolving quasisingularities or their patterns.
In
the distinguishing of indistinguishable discernment of indiscernibles we feel it a common sense truth that one best of
possible world may exist if any one of them may exist and that one
the special application of laws for systems if indeed in this
principle of intelligible systems we can know or not it is the
highest or deepest case. Time and space, the not forbidden design
where all grounded formally as nonnecessity that a necessary one may
exist, is generalized where the core philosophy meets pragmatic
science, at least the an omnic sense of time as if its abstract
illusion or reality or emergence of phenomena over clear thresholds
in the main, is this principle of nonnecessity as a source or
motivation.
In
the mirror of our hearts we may understand the necessary exception
that the same principle allows the possibility of transcending our
idea of a totality of being unto more general systems of the laws be
they in dreams or in reality. Thus for some this is the common sense
or feeling that grounds such hope.
*
* * * * * *
Footnote
on one of my illustrations of yesterday, the colors of the Pesla
cube, if the circuit is closed I would use magenta rather than brown
of the eight because that not found in the rainbow. And in the game
graphics I point out again that as it is presented as a sketch 256
will have its own f-sub-n reverse-6-sub-n abstract quasic motion functions
of which that general representation I have posted many times and I
suspect no one has understood or considered it. At least as a source
of combinotorics it is useful for the count where one may learn or
find clarity of questions as recreation. It generates some
beautiful number theory (which as the method is still very informal I
have posted very little of it).
Sometimes
we face a blank page yet it is does not give the usual anxiety or
sense of loss at completion for a writer.
*******
*
* * *
No comments:
Post a Comment