**New Constellations**

*L. Edgar Otto**05 March, 2013*

Hunters, gods, ships
and eagles

their fall into the earth or sun

Add to the celestial
globe soul skeletons

connect the dots, fill in colors and myths

Beyond it is a fire
not just a sieve

these dots of light in hues and depths, stars

Or dark stars that
cannot decide if they

go nowhere or when, tortise chasing

New stars in the
night should fill the sky

a distant time of conflicting hearts

Twinkle, spark, we
long time falling up or down

the ground joined phosphene cosmic latte

Crosseyed in the
forgetful expansion taking time

Cautious spiral arms,
conscious vertigo into pole stars

* * * * *

**Theories:**04 March, 2013 17:23:34

*the cross-eyed
viewing as quasinfinite requires withing the empty wave like intervals integer
value focusing, plus 1 2 3 4 singularities in the quasic brane which amounts to
log like additive roots position wherein we regard an infinity over the finite interval that absolute infinite motion (repeated or cyclic) is the limit of
absolute rest over an indefinite linear multiplicity , depth cross-eyeing, this
concept is in general independent of strict dimensional relations of ordered
(hierarchical) quasic abstract motions of rest or functions of movement between
the dimensions.

In regard to the vertical axes the horizontal transition does not show local expansion, dilatation over boundaries.

*20:56:34 From the quasic quasifinite view, the depth
and span AM FM generalized multiplexing of it all, the relationship of
quasinifnite (endless chase unto a limit) between depth and span super positioning, better describes a solution to Zeno's ultimate Achilles
paradox. Consciousness on the quasic
level can be seen as a hard science of transceivers between sentient
singularities where these depth span differences ground the source geometry of
such synchronous source exchanges akin to when we pass horizons (here the flat
brane or cosmic worm hole lines) between space and time, or mirrors as say
electron or monopole, space and time, matter or antimatter, sub-duality
mediators, as physicality.

* * * *

Interestingly, the
science magazines are deep into soul searching as to what physics is in our
time and what the search for a theory of everything means, what the role of
mathematics is in it after all, and the ultimate question of what and why we
and the the universe are. This a thread
theme or topic in Gibbs website.

I come there as a
poet or philosopher, sometimes my art is art and not just mathematical but the
process of focusing the light of wisdom is like that of science. Thus I summarize these theories inspired by
ongoing looks at the foundations in this poem New Constellations, the colors at
least the four primaries of the birds.
An eagle flattened at least to the hyperbolic spinning disc which is an
artist's view, a drawing of a sunspot at least a hundred years ago at the turn
of the century.

15:05:46

*Depth Discreteness and Catastrophe*
It should be obvious
by now that the general idea of super symmetry theories, in the simple case of
issues of non-locality, entanglement, the physical apparatus we set up for our
thought experiments as in quantum eraser from at least dual slit experiments is
as theory incomplete as well as our idea we sense such an incompleteness in the
quantum theory- or alternatively the
insistence on a foundation as completeness was the wrong interpretation as to
the state of the reality.

These anomalies, that
is black body radiation or that lack of discovering the aether wind, have their
analogs to day in the observations from our modern particle accelerators. It is the unification, of which I suggest is
the comparison of a wider view of dimensions of singularity of linear (number
line) and brane flat spaces where we insist on the flatness as if an absolute
grounding. In the usual slit
experiments the spectrum shifts along this number line and the count if we
polarize light passing thru is discrete or particle like with respect to that
line but the wider plane, with tricks of reversals or not in two quasic axes
over the whole system as interpreted distinguishing particle and wave, is
the probability curve of wavelike
properties. But the ground plane
symmetry has more implied or illusion dimensions for this continuity as at
least the powers of 2, here independent of the uncertainty of equal
partitioning of path choice or the integration of transfinite levels of
description.

Can we design an
experiment which conveys this unification ultimately of the wave and particle
idea in these higher symmetries of whatever general nature? Have we only designed our experiments and not
necessarily or mathematics or intuitions to find the expected decision as to
the results quasi-independent of our issues of consciousness influencing
things? From one view the LHC and other such projects amount to such an
experiment, as yet incomplete.

Can physics exist as
intelligible without such anomalies so is unified in a general theory of
everything, the goal of what mass or gravity means without some form of acknowledgement of super symmetries including hidden or dark null spaces?

It is not clear that
we can merge antimatter generally to tap the calculated greater mass of energy
thus assume for all so called particles there are anti particles to fix to the
idea of super-symmetry involved.

Of course quasics is
but a third level of many physics possible but almost less relevant in is
spectral measures... but in the depth as well as span we have this century old
paradox of wave particle description, certainly there are techniques to resolve
this which is evidently at least a four fold problem- and certainly in possible
phenomena and properties of spaces of natural dimension can be at least five
fold.

These depth and span
differences, each in a sense cross-eyed, that is at least two chiral slits,
should be useful in the measure of physical phenomena over the omnium on an
arithmetical level, abductive, inductive or deductive or as illusions or not, of
exact values, approximations, or dimensionless intrinsically or not.

How we apply our
sentience (that is thought experiments) as influential in say the
interpretation of quantum theory (or inertia, gravity, mass, and so on) is
neutral yet equivalent to the actual possible influence itself, albeit that
intermittently and indefinite.

This is simpler and
more profound than simply and algebraic unifying formula. It is a question at the heart of unity, the
Law of Omnium: namely, unity equals zero times infinity in its widest dynamic
and possibly transcending metaphysical sense a we divide general space and
depth time or source time also as continuous or discretely.

* * * * *

## No comments:

## Post a Comment