Monday, March 11, 2013

Tangible Jack Stones (Strawberry Fields Forever and Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds)

Tangible Jack Stones  (Strawberry Fields Forever and Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds)

L. Edgar Otto  08 March, 2013 09:39:43 PM

Let us take the radical position that the actuality and observable properties of reality (the Omnium) is a product of sentience or consciousness, the Mind...  As this in a sense transcends the mere physicality models, can we say there is something deeper beyond our current speculations that may ground existence past principles of uncertainty where it paradoxically but with complementarity arises?  If not is there an adequate explanation as to why this is not the case?

A tangible principle is one of touch, intimate contiguity in close local proximity as opposed to inferred non-local vision at a distance so as to define geometry by these two aspects. This asserts more classical and Euclidean structures are central grounding resolving other models of space structures dynamically as well the idea of what is concrete or virtual in the sense they are objective or subjective mirrored descriptions.  This principle suggests that the arrangement of abstract objects can intelligibly form patterns independent of dimensions and scales.

For example, the idea of jack stones, crystal group arrangement of a number of lines, vectors, axes in space as if interlocking linear rods tells us in construction on our familiar, say the interlocking of toothpicks, level that we can expect the same symmetries on the molecular level as if we see such bonding at a distance beyond our instruments of sight- or given finer instruments confirm the descending scale independence of congruency of these patterns.

Being a follower of Coxeter and dependent on an early age by touch more than sight, Buckminster Fuller developed geometry more toward the tangible in his insights.  Vision in the abstract sense of Mind also focuses into shadows of at least a vague fourth dimension into tangible space- his term for this field around the concrete is tensegrity by which objects derive solidity even as we build structures with less physical materials.  A geodesic dome being centered in the fourth dimension does not collapse under its own weight as we would expect with respect to the gravity.  The less material, the more empty space around tangible objects the more it takes on the familiar scale of solidity and the symmetry shift laws of the states of matter.

Of course this view, being limited to four dimensionality, is not as deep in the physics model building as is Coxeter's generalizations, nor perhaps on to Conway to make the change from 8 to 24 dimensions then we debate what may be beyond this in simple algebraic and geometric patterns.

Given two ways to arrange six objects that roughly corresponds to doubled axes at right angles- or of the diamond lattice, not a cube but more like an inverse of duality (here I imagine Vuyk intuits and justifies as it is the nature of quantum ideas of which to address as part of a unified physics) our ideas of vibration of xtal lattices and these within the same level of dimension imagined doubled at a distance or even superimposed at some fixed points.  This is the general idea of what bonds tangible objects together more than just the surprisingly different electromagnetic fields as a description of exchanges of mediator particles. (this principle has many forms as description including as a model for dark matter or energy exchanges behind the scene in hidden symmetries but given these ideal xtal positions we can imagine objects "vibrating" dynamically between them as if in Vuyk's pinball model. 

We can relate this to Feynman who tries to see what it would feel like to be an electron vibrating and quite inside its own level of uncertainty to which hidden symmetries are unclear as to if they exist or not so that ultimate quantum reality, thus reality, remains mysterious and in principle unknowable. My take on the abstract group or xtalline structure I have called "flangelation" which can be seen like the principle of tensegrity with a little more general dimensions or a vibration between the natural count of geometric objects under projective duality as with the cube and octahedron angles involved in these abstract points of which moving things like light tend to bounce as in Vuyk's pinball concept. 

But the cube is not as fundamental as the tetrahedron as a simplex polyhedron to which the higher Platonic solids structurally intelligibly conform in the count of complex and real positions or resloved functions as if positions approached.  That said, Vuyk conceives of the subspinning of the points of a tetrahedron as relevant, especially chirally in physics phenomena discussing the vacuum more like an onion locally of creative black holes (while the raspberry idea is in a sense focused abstractly as some beginning of action) this carbon like property of bonding even without a higher dimensional center, a 4D five tetrahedral cell polytope, we could erect a theory that suggests it as a foundational totality (I call the celestic as I call a diffuse uncentered multiverse the ultranscontinuum, for it did have irreversible transcontinuum direction) this is the profound insight of Yuri.

What this amounts to is a deeper fractal like level or hierarchy of vacuum and concrete phenomena of which the resolution remains in a paradox if we follow part views of our general given systems of intelligible design.  Depth from the span of simple holographic continua... seeds in the raspberry for those who imagine baby universes of relatively free energy of its totality independent or dependent paradoxically in oscillations of what the state of things were at a beginning or came before.  Branching models to transfer energy are as important as warps like helices and spirals, discs and spheres, or waves. 

The Tripod of the three physics could see these as complimentary or unified, even contradictory but quantized discretely or flat and at rest to the natural dimension in a static finite (usually dodecahedral in symmetry but the sense of this goes deeper into 5 fold symmetry patterns when a distinct number fits the branching as structures in the stereonometry to act as if a unique prime entity whose unity may be independent of other primes in the structures of the vacuum as if in isolation.)  The physics are at once unified, quantized, and the third one a quasication mediating the other two but not less important than the other two legs for it too follows in the three into one thus four, quaternity, of intelligible but nonnecessary logic.

So these more classical ideas can be considered a return to earlier simpler models when in fact to consider them in new light as adding to the mix can be a more advanced case.  Yet the corpuscular view, closer to the idea of partons rather than quarks for example, of a particle is something I share with Pitkanen as to how we may layer the onion of forces even for the lowly electron- it is a matter of taste for our structures more than presumption of progress that can be a false, even delayed awakening of things hidden that is the hallmark of science looking under the hood of reality since the ancient Greeks.  But Pitkanen, as well as Conway is looking beyond the usual counting of things in dimensions of a higher qualitative level that despite their genius is all to often said controversial and dismissed by those we feel are not yet capable of seeing the obvious then explaining it.

For those at least in the spirit of it suggest sacred geometry or those who point out long traditions of intuitive knowledge tried and true as evolving folk medicines or even cultural laws appropriate to the times, the great Eastern traditions certainly have just as an important a place despite the mystery often if not made unhidden of the unknown it remains the same spirit as science in its goals and can be like Buddhism a science cryptic in replies to what it cannot say, mystic in what it may seem pointless to contemplate.  Kepler said to be the first falsifiable scientific system is still dismissed petty much as a mystic in his system of worlds. In a retro engineering and recapitulation of his system with new insights into dimensions his could prove, in the Western tradition, not the first but also the last of our current regimes of mathematical physics down to the subatomic and string like theories.

Let us consider, beyond this first this essential relation between two point like entities and that between them, abstractly and ideally as one of many models, dynamic or without clear dynamic causation, what is better explained where in an intelligible matrix or as algebraic patterns over our vague idea of  cloudiness as non-linearity, an arithmetical extension of parallel axes, dual or not, of significant polarity and signs or not, of spins and drags and shadow momentum or virtual but unreal spiralling or not as if one sided in the extension of quantum theory to Feynman diagrams simplifying to three parallel rods to map nuclear effects, quarks as conceived dynamically thus linearly in a simplified sense with counts of loops and their meaning or not, or the general inversions or projections of such flat brane like graph notations...we should note that the cubic right angled thee axes of two rods form a tensegrity or a concrete interlocking structure globally as if embedded in a higher space with an unclear centering of connectivity's.

But in the diamond lattice, as with Vuyk's pinball diagram,  while doubled axes may interlock, to see the pattern globally requires three such rods for each of the vector axes.  But the tangible jack stones can be imagined with analogs into the higher dimensions where say we interlock parallel planes, and so on.  Geometry is difficult to try to understand or develop a higher sense of things and we can decry the lack of this understanding when we see the beauty and truth of such systems at least as systems anyway or even dismiss such thoughts, really of a higher qualitative leap or step as fancy only to which this does not explicitly apply to the real world... like Sheldon in the Big Bang sit com we can feel sympathy for others not as wise if not for their state of ignorance, yet humor has qualitative levels too in the epic of our search for a theory of everything, of comedy and tragedy depending on our human evaluation of our states of mind and achievements.

If science does consider evolution a fact and contemplating our own navels or beyond as if some origin a waste of time, considering the rapidity of xtalization of wisdom and technology in even mechanical evolution- is it wise to keep down the level of learning or evaluation of any promising new path or idea? Do we fear the known being in ignorance of more than what a meme can do in the sharing be it influential for good or ill as our science grows more complex?  Have we not seen and touched genius in some minds as a mysterious whole as well its small universes barren or full of seeds as well against the climate and plucker's of a variegated rose we sprout an army of thorns?

The lowly box turtle keeps its rounds, sleeps in the heat of day or hibernates in the winter. It survives with its shell opening only when full of summer berries and for replication risking if falling on its back and cannot get up it suffocates as in the competition of war.  Like it I have made the rounds close to the simple logic and foundations, not the bloated bounty of fields grown for the jam, for of all things in the old forests and meadows, the box turtle relishes above all things the simple wild strawberry, its bright seeded surface anyway and outer shell, carapace or canopy or gray matter to smile it seems as foundations hold up our wider skies.

In the simple illustration I name a new color, raspberry, and a variation.  You see, sometimes the total effect is brighter than the dull hues that make up the colors in the spectrum of a maiden's hair... or the vibrant colors lost into the whole.  These are #A73931 (167,57,49) and #BD21155 (189,33,21)and their compliments (that is the raspberry oscillates- it may not need a virtual cloud of empty absolute objects with a keyboard to call it a blackberry), but I have yet to find the ideal color spectra to which it is hard to distinguish hues if I try for a 40 based system for example.

* * * * *

 Monday, from Dupage County Illionis Posting:  I see Lubos has recent posts coming closer to the more intricate and deeper ideas of space and dimenion... I suppose we will all arive there shortly...

******* Addendum    April 2, 2013  Eau Claire, WI

Leo Vuyk remarks on my drawing above on facebook... that maybe one raspberry is enough... this of course is like the paradoxes we encounter in the many or one entity problem...  But my area is quite different with these quasic concerns of similarity and tries to see deep into possible structures in the void... in a sense there is but one principle as if one universe but that would have consequences as to what we may view or what theories may find new energy mechanisms- the insights of Vuyk stand and do seem to have some confirmation- neutral particles and so on... Higgs which perhaps is a wide range structurally as if one of the raspberry sub berries much like the overall Planck map picture.  Things could vibrate as a field and we should find the specific theory and sequence informationally of  the interrelationships- a sort of n-dimensional printing and architecture.  The idea of a monopole is such a paradox of which it seems  very much reduced to a point or sea of points, the seeds on a wild strawberry... the usual problem with Maxwell's equations so I do not know if Leo's posting today is not a paradox of the insight of the variation as if we have a few intersecting universes.  If in my old idea of the ultranscontinuum as a step beyond the continuum (which is more or less relativistic, quantum, and Newtonian in the old sense) then the step beyond that of the transcontinuum (irreversible's, thermodynamic, a direction where at bottom the direction say of time is as infinite indistinguishable  then we have two insights that need to be better resolved here- but certainly there is not contradiction- just the need for wider views--- my Ulcm considers all such objects as if parallel multiverses the same, rather a spatial crystalline view- but the raspberry idea is more general than this and should prove useful in better understanding empty space and the role of thermodynamic symmetry laws.

* * *

No comments:

Post a Comment