Uniform Colour Space (Detour from a General Standard Theory)
L. Edgar Otto 07 July, 2012
Uniform color space is possible in a quasic, artistic, symmetrical system provided we keep in mind the mirrors and dark compliments in this nonnecessary diversity of patterns and this law which acknowledges the spectrum view of Newton:
An actual physical entity as a higher analog to Rowlands metaphysical idea of existence of muons and all that is not muons adds units by addition as in the conventions of calculus and the insight of Sir Arthur Eddington. But the unity added is a wild card (*) that equals 1 or 0, a sort of gray area of intelligible non necessity including the paradox of dynamic necessary cases to which to find an abstract idea of uniform color space (here we discus the artistic or subjective view) as requiring the unity of the physics beyond the quason in matters of addition or subtraction of light by reflection. Nature is artistic in its design as well as scientific.
The application to the structure of atoms, singularly or in some ordered place in the quason in the periodic table suggests intelligible interpretations of their properties as materiality and physicality.
In general one side of the dark mirror (nature has no intrinsic bias but does regard an expansion or reduction into the accumulation of mass) centered at Ag will divide the table into atoms that radiate or atoms that hold or adsorb against the fission. Note that this is also an issue of what is to be considered 3 + 1 or 2x2 4D formalism. Pb is the end product of radiation and Th is the 90th element along the way that is the beginning (as if the place in such tables quasically represent analogs to initiator or terminator codons in biology) of the +1 of 14 shell elements in the Ac series all in that shell mirror radioactive.
In the higher electron numbers, beyond Ac in the mirror we find 22 or 11x2 elements suggesting a relation along the lines of the golden irrational ratio independent of the strict reading of the number base as count or sensation, Platonic or reductionist (for both philosophy's in a uniform sentient space and physical space appear to be uniform and unified also) which is also the sum after the decimal of the Fibonacci series where we do have a shifting count as well a labeling of the metalanguage so determined in a unified view.
I find it of interest Pt is a catalyst for parthenogenesis and Cd carcinogenic when it comes to (intrinsic) properties we observe as transition metals and the organic realm of non metals and metals proper.
Moreover, elements like Cm are known to be plane lasers (that is they lase but on the surface of the sun) and the stars in general are intimate to atomic structure changes. The atomic weight of Ir suggests it is a possible evolved substance in the dynamic hidden symmetries in atoms. Of course all this so far involves electron configuration.
The idea of primary colors in the metaphysical or metalanguage sense, to be coextensive with but not necessarily the substance of a pure but species specific consciousness so defined may be three or four in the description and in some species (birds see four and turtles five primaries to which this suggests a symmetric structure that can be useful to species if the center point is presumed to add a dimension to the abstract color space (we in three space assume in the hierarchy of interpretations of the quantum theory the center point at least a black and white polar contrast to the hues proper.)
Yet, due to our four color receptor structures we can imagine (psychologically) the reality of the addition of yellow as a primary with red, blue, and green which while it includes our ideas of color addition or subtraction by reflection also includes the four fold philosophy of a unity of the artistic and scientific view to which in the mechanical treatment via the binary system (internet bases) these are not unified as a single idea over a four fold color logic. There is variations and diversity of perception and perspective or the sensing or even the confusion of the senses in our higher philosophical ideas as if these are abstract pattern perceptions which may or may not be a common philosophic shared experience in terms of either the artistic or scientific formalism as proof.
Let us also keep in mind that 9^3 minus (8^3 + 6^3) = +1, that is c^3 does not equal a^3 + b^3 and so on in the elementary context of Fermat's last theorem dynamically for stereonomic space structures real or virtual.
* * * * *