Phosphorescent
Confluence
L. Edgar Otto 27 February, 2013
* From the
generational abstract physicality of geometric structure, brain development is
the combinotorics as seen from right and double right angle relative
orientations that are dynamically embedded within the natural dimensional
foundations of dualistic mirrors within or on these level. This determines the rate of expression, for
adaptation, and the state of general development in an individual, and what
genes persist as if in a reduced level as off or on.
*Hallucination or
illusions as such where so distinguished structurally and at what state of
computational speed in these abstract and or physical confluences parallel
between relatively fixed or within a threshold of adaptability as the clear
exchange between conceptual and neurological processes of symbol substitution.
*The disruption of
the process needs not be a catastrophic or instant transformation but is within
a certain span analyzable, predictable, and reversible either intrinsically or
from outside- yet it may be that these abstract conceptional confluences reduce
to irreversible isolation and regression to looping default internal or runaway expression unto confused chaos and progressive incoherence.
*Within the relevance
of the profiling as a probability of uncertainties, the polar or linear aspects applied to angles of quasifinite view, including the core instinct that defaults
at bottom to survival, we can expect that in general human behavior should in
the main be considered, even for those we distrust or fear for some reason,
reliably that of good will unto others at survival depth. This in dimensional confluences with reaction
to the temporal state change: the way upward from suicidal depression may be
acute within or hidden to what is seen from outside the person's state if
mind. Also, as with chemical intervention
for quelling of only the symptoms, the chemicals themselves may be the ongoing
and building source of hidden yet building thus catastrophic violence to self
and others.
*Some social agendas
while seeming good advice in the rearing of children, regardless of the concern
of the parents, the mother in particular, may socially promote violence in the
child.
*When we disturb the
sea water it can induce in stress or in shock waves the phosphorescent light
from the small organisms. Or in
sufficient mass the bacteria may begin to give off a glow or what may be or
seem action in the unity of the structural presence at a distance responding
also to numerical laws.
*We should keep in
mind that the observer and his observation stance or system is as important as
what we can expect from an individual developing psyche- in a more healthy society with emphasis on reasonable character and honesty the general
environment is that we should value and care for what in someone is the source of
future health and wisdom for the whole- especially in respect to children and
the natural rate at which they awaken.
It takes children to raise up a
village as well a village to raise a child.
*As there are no
necessary realities there are cases on all levels where in technical ignorance
in the depths of complexity, such as physically in the growth of cancer, there
is no hope- but the descent to this is not a catastrophic instance. Moreover, there are physical traits that
allow for the substitution or confluence of concepts in the bonds founded on inheritance alone, especially if acting in concert or secure as a power among
many of the genetic state of the time subject to the range of certainty over
conceptual chaos-science considerations of spatial group numbers, groups, and
dimensions all interacting and weighing symbol substitutions.
*I know these ideas
as presented are difficult to read and have my developed personal jargon and
poetic idiom. So from it I want to
emphasize the scope of the general foundational principle of the non-necessary
and quasifinite conceptual stance. We
deal as best we can carefully in the depth of expression and in partial
adapting to a set method of things like spell checking choices and standards of
say, technical writing while these of course change either superficially or
substantially. It suggests a the core of
our long held debates as to structured vacua or singularities as distinctly
continuous or as discrete, the issue of what is our concept of point or line as
the infinite, if we in fact allow the idea of an absolutely empty space as if
matter between objects of unspecified potential infinities.
These do not
necessarily interact- nor do I think we have settled these paradoxes explicitly
while we seek and try to do so. That
general caution in translation and the texts possible treatment as the not
intended ideas or even misinformation the general principle is that we also
should consider a super absolutely empty space, questions of unitary or
multiple objects or paths put aside for the moment as well if there can be a
continuous space in the arguments that can never be empty.
For in general space
such a line may not only miss its crystalline finite points but pass thru them
in the hierarchy of dimensions or even a dimensionless stereonometric
environment as if invisible- that still a question of technique to develop in
higher dimensional cloaking. On this
level of complexity we may have in a sense innocuous super-positioning or even
a distance to where these may be more probable in proximity of some idea of
distance inward or outward to merge or interact or decay into some sort of
symmetry of vacua as substance or force.
But if these two core
concepts of vacua as full or empty can meet in some singularity like unification
or compromise conceptually or physically- may this not only suggest from a
wider sense of space and time such properties may be exchanged as to the
general reality of all nonnecessary cases?
This then the not necessarily quasi-rational core of what could be like a
teleology of an even higher theory of everything- something still beyond our
questions of why and where from the universe if it can be asked rather than not
so its being... Something transcending
and not necessarily imagined or known beyond our idea of consciousness even
beyond the multiplicity of connections.
Sometimes in the
exploration of such question, if for that we are open to concepts and in a
habit of care in reasoning, from the complexity of awareness, a phosphorescence
of light so to speak at a threshold, understanding and new concepts fall out
with explanations apparent of what were mysteries not expected in general from
the confluence or remote mixing of ideas and metaphors- words if creative may
do so in concert collectively as much as any symbols that condense the concepts
we evolve. Why do we expect the
simplicity of the universe so as to ask of nature why something like the triplication of particles? The
foundational ground may not evoke or need memory nor energy to move where some
things persist as fixed- or they can equivalently expand and amplify the small
or large beyond beyond apparent empty depths that existence somehow constrains
confluences intelligibly.
* * * * * *
The Supernilcontinuum (Sncm)
Thoughts while posting this afternoon:
I probably do not need a name for this super absolute vacuum concept as a continuum- and I mean continuum in the sense of it as a first step of world views to a hierarchy of physical and philosophic models.
Can we not explore a higher analog here by those interested in analysis, especially the complex analysis, of such a space to Riemann's mapping a sphere to the complex plane?
The chiralities involved apply to carbon especially in the general workings of the genome and other organic phenomena. A chiral state can be considered a vector in such a quasifinite view because we consider the direction as well the totality of a coherent system. We moreover show the connection of such directions between organic molecules and chains of them which at a certain threshold of complexity and the presence of material these vectors intelligibly relate with intrinsic locations for such quasifinite directions and all the reduction symmetries involved with the quasi-superposition of forces.
This apples to the subjective expression too, for we imagine the quasic representation of the genome, the codon encoding, matched to basic chemical properties- now how would that complex brane like plane look and how well can it integrate macroscopic organic subsystems from such foundational structures?
* * * * * * 02-27-13 5:53 pm
No comments:
Post a Comment