**Tbrane (T for Turing) and The Spirit of Science beyond the Teleoscoping Information or Brane Theories**

**02 February, 2013**

*L. Edgar Otto**11:50:56 PM*

* In a quasic
hierarchy we can fundamentally distinguish dimensioned coordinates of what is
rest or motion.

* It follows that on
the same abstract dimensional level relativity my not generally, completely,
ground ideas of conservation, and levels of say acceleration may act relatively
(for example not recognize constants of velocity in its physics of particles).

* The diagonal method
does and does not necessarily work to solve a given problem, formally or
explicitly, continuity as analog has its value (outside of the coincidences and heuristic initial states of chaotic inputs for a theory) if not a better way to computability than digital depending on what we regard as deeper singularity
structures.

* Is DNA (as an
example of encoding, quasic at that) in a sense a universal Turing machine ? It
shares the quasic property of no explicit meaning beyond four 1's or objects.

* Computation as
digital or analog, a minimum (as in the celestic continuum or Celestron, at the
same excluded null or zero equally gives gaps or holes in a linear continuum.

* Thus teleoscoping
as the square root of the quasic brane may halt things by the descent into
loops as well hierarchical come to rest vacuum states, these also proposed as a
system of gravity in its geometry for modern physics unification.

* Pointless repetition (as in DNA) or if it totally random, quasifinite in its vague fields
like regions of contiguity, over a segment of real continuity, gives no useful
information nor an actual DNA sequence of abstractions (see Church lamba logic
on this term) as generating functions of
functions (so to we regard the bracket notation of quantum theory.

* This excludes in
the discrete case the experimental compass of Bell's inequality or in the
continuous case of what we infer from our double and single slit experiments,
that is the generators in Pascal's triangle, 1's or nulls.

* Numbers, and
geometric structures, both are abstract as classes or algorithmic functions to
which in a world of general nonnecessity there are algorithmic exceptions.

* The success of a
computational program at a sufficient threshold of complexity depends on the
closeness of design models in which we privilege or are biased toward thus
unnaturally imbalance that which could focus to a unitary view.

* The emphasis on an
informationist view as foundational physics is not enough to envision the total
theory of everything as if it could replace all other trends and views.

* Over an infinite
expanse, as if Omega Omnium, an Ultimate or at least an absolute, with
quasimotion as the measure of the scale of things is not an impractical
impediment to the general theory for large numbers, for these in the idea of
the null simplify the Plenum of divergences.

* An abstract brane
may indeed be an algebraic superposition of Universal Turing machines held close
to the general brane (quasic flatland) ad a beginning unto the existential
(points or events) singularities as quasi-coordinates as Qbrane encoding of
geometrical dualities, this the innate given of complexity reduced as
actuality.

* In this we may still have room for at least
what evolves and is given or appears as a greater generality (n-branes interact
just like n-groups, collectively or partially, or as n-dimensions, not necessarily consistent for the greater empty space of any local or universal
view.

* We may be able to
extend the Omnium as states of interacting realities (or equivalently a unified
reality) as if super quasifinite and with lesser levels of these branes in
abstract rest-motion allow for certain physical or external given of material
or encoding datum so permit the combining of
and self regeneration of, different
endowed systems each and between n-body force-like resolutions, the
lesser results of determinism or free wills.
In quasi-isolation or in self-referential closed looping dark zone
proximity thresholds, conflict what of perception and observers surpasses even
the teleology seen now as the reality of metaphysics as magic.

* Self- destructive
systems, the dual interplay of the data in cell systems from a single algorithmic source, including spontaneous or inadequately endowed material or context (aside
from Mind as if a computational machine); the persistence of non-algorithmic
interplay systems such as cancer, can be bypassed up to some higher level, that
also transcends the paradox of time an entropy as reversible and yet
irreversible views, that the spirit as higher sentience, consciousness,
awareness is defined as unique while the general sense of it begins with the
transcendence of transcendence imagined as a quantum leap as welt it a qualitative emergence.

* At this higher theory level, for example, we
could create physical entities that work such as gravons in theory if we cared
to invent them de novo. We need not remain, with luck, forever prisoners of
outdated ideologies of false scarcity and worlds end or limits believed on all
scales of frontiers, even if quasifinite the ultimate description of the Omnium
- if we so desire such awakening and do so carefully with sufficient
inspiration, innovation, and intuition in our implementation of knowledge.

* On our current
levels of achievement it is not necessarily true and is unlikely that solving
one universal problem from these now understood directions (the NP hard for
example) solves all in the wider generalization. There are still surprises in our existence
(and what a so much wider gift or stumble upon this universe now seems to me)
beyond our wisdom possible in its magic.
I am amazed at how little I know or in the slow awakening of the steeper
learning curve that of some things I understood in part but did not see the
significance of nor comprehend- and this coming so late in my life with the
feeling that someone in these things I was born late and thought I knew but
have not since say that height at thirty have lived- this surely our shared
feelings as we move thru our smooth or punctuated states of age.

* These items came
last but out of place in the flow of thoughts from the original page of
manuscripts * a. that 5 branes can in a higher physics abstraction interact as
if a cyclic duality as if 5 hidden and explicit universal Turing
machines. and *b. We imagine a distant
Heaven evolved from or some condition pointing to the real, but this possibility
of vision can be as much here and now as earthly also.

With the philosophy
out of the way I had hope now to get to the mapping in quasic space the Turing
patterns, I expect as these listed in
Penrose in denary and binary, his sketch, that these put meat into my
speculative theories of yesterday or so as to what in the shifting patterns of
dark space we may decide what is surrounded by what as if found in the
distribution in one universe but most likely uniform in pattern if seen as many
of them of the class of things we call prime.
Would these not seem looping and self-referential, perhaps teleoscoping
with all its paradoxes still...

* * * * * *

As a rough guess as
to the dimensions, pixels in the quasic plane if there are roughly 2048 denary
digits then in binary these most likely involve at least a doubling of the
digits for a general count to which we should look for patterns as where sub-regions may influence different scales as such machines in this case closer
to a square form of say 4096 to add a general dimension as with the usual way
to find the degrees of freedom as if dimensions in string theory. Note, as in the partial suggestions in the
illustration I just made for this post to the usual count we add a few as
multiples of 6, for example for a double particle add rigid rotations or these
doubled all involving the patterns of 24 up to four space.

03 February,
2013 01:52:06 AM

* * * * * * *

## No comments:

## Post a Comment