Quasifinite Omega
Omnium
(Non-necessary
Metaphysical Interchange Principle of Necessary and Chance Existence as the
Paradox of Ultimate Identity and Being)
L. Edgar Otto 17 February, 2013
Can there be a gray
color ultimately as the compliment of itself in a finite regime?
As there are
exceptions in the paradox of quasifinte nonnecessity as to what may be in the
wider clarity or emptiness of wildcards and null spaces, at this seeming borderland between philosophy and theology,
the visual and illusion system under consideration here for the purposes of
general calculation and understanding of sentience, I offer but a metaphysical
conjecture at this point for a physicality system and where it applies as to
issues of identity-
that :
"What is necessary in the exception in a non-necessary system (thus
necessary), may be interchanged with what seems the mirror or reverse
of a case as
exception (thus not necessary)."
Are there general topology
concepts of which I or all of us are not aware that grounds this pattern of
reasoning, particularly of some degrees of the application of this process as
to what is or observed in reality? Case
in point, the idea of hidden symmetries for action at a distance or non local
inferences between objects and states of spin?
I have seen children
of a certain age and heard reports that at a certain time they draw the human
face with four eyes. The idea moreover,
Piaget, of what it may mean when children or adults- or other creatures,
recognize others and themselves in a mirror (some adults who insist on covering
all mirrors they encounter such as in a motel room.) One child would draw clouds of lines over his
face picture and upon asking him about it he said "this is Jason all tied
up."
In some species, and
in sensitive nodes in the human brane we understand the idea of a third eye- yet
in the cross-eyed merger of the centers of left and right, or non-right, brain
hemispheres the third eye is not understood as above the other two so merged as
if a complex plane property although it is a general property of innate
grounding of a child's sense of geometry or of illusions of space and its discernment and processing. This
strikes me as a topological problem, greater than our understanding or lack of
it by so called differential geometry.
This relates to my
earlier post called "Athenation" and some of today's post resolved in
a very clear dream upon awakening of a labyrinth (not quite as clear as my
illustrations portray) in the path computation by the exclusion of color in
paint overrides from the first I tried such a representation of logic a decade
ago without animation. Jason all tied up
a resolution of these sorts of space discernment and degrees of discernment
paradoxes.
Clearly such
chromo-logic requires a well tempered set of colors with informational
complements in a quasifinite uniform color space of so many dimensions and sets
to make the computations apply across labeled boundaries.
I do not see it more
than an ideal case to which we apply the idea of a one sided surface that
distinguishes the surface from the boundary edge. But given this we may say that in a
projective plane the edge of a Moebious strip may map to that of a disc in the
projective plane. But since a Klein's bottle can be divided into two Moebious
strips can we not conclude as if with four eyes there can be a doubling of this
correspondence of the disc circumference and the edge of the strips? If such topology is known then why do we not
apply it to more general ideas of the halving and doubling laws that may ground
particle physics?
In the movie
"Looper" a young man meets himself in a public diner having not
closed a loop of time (and these are issues of our perception or illusions and
paradoxes where they involve tachyonic like ideas of time travel as an
extension of the three physics or philosophies of space so to resolve). The young man remarks that the face of the
older man appears "backwards".
This idea has been considered throughout speculative fiction in many
forms.
It is known that we
may not fully explain why the left and right in a mirror are interchanged and
not the up and down, relatively. So, can
it be in some sense that if we were to encounter the quasifinite (no inside or
outside necessary perspective set as exceptions or centering or not) that we:
"Do not
necessarily see the reverse or inversions in any space of a face we would seen
in a mirror in the same circumstance of time and space?"
Interestingly, in
these questions that are also questions of observation and unique or multiple
roles of observers, we may of course photograph what we observe between a
present face and what it sees in a mirror or so imagine the reversal as if we
reverse the symmetry of the taken image.
The idea I call
loop-chip is distinguished from labyrinth or path computation chips in the
computation application to computation as well the imagined energy differences
say between organic molecules of the same substance but mirrored if of a
sufficient complexity of matter, atoms. And these with degrees of n-space and
n-group superposition may be drawn or merged in functions together- may or may
not require some reduction into compromises of clock time.
While in the philosophy
forums I raised the intellectual idea of a great secret to express (of which
all of us can seem to hope for some overriding law of universe or explanation)
by which we explain or reject our vulnerability to the unknown or write it off
to chance, coincidence. The secret is
this:
"There is no
Universe"
One news commentary
mentioned the recent meteor event in the Urals of an explosion with a great
shock wave breaking windows- also a fire ball observed in California. It stated that it had nothing to do with the
near miss asteroid. While I am not
asserting in some sort of global space that this is not the case I raise this
issue from another show that said the dinosaurs did not have a way to monitor
such events from beyond the earth nor the abilities so were vulnerable. Some things their intellect could not know
while we do.
But without some
further breakthroughs in new physics if such a wider view is there, without the
threshold of learning or the materials there or not yet processed from gene or
other natural encoding endowments is it wise to reject what we show we may not
clearly have progressed enough to understand?
Now we may try to
explain what amounts to conspiracies of coincidence where a sentient being of
limited freedom of inquiry, thought, and interpretation imagines the world as
all there is and that such things as felt traditionally as certain identity, as
to the idea of immortality in at least the life of the mind or memory as fame
or legacy to pass on what is the brief but concrete reality of the physical and
social world. This reaches paradoxes in
defining behavior or for a while equivalent ideas of systems as if possessed or
controlled by self or others or the general climate to contain or develop a
path or agenda of belief and behavior.
The rule of law as
indifferent in principle has no reach for what is such an ultimate truth so to
resolve the scene so there is some truth we the watched are no worse than some
of our watchers. These are as much universal
issues as newly discovered ones- for we can, as if an exception to the
diversity potentially in the world classify dramatic situations and enumerate
their dentric pathways fractal-like as surely as to the probability of two
snowflakes alike if we allow a sense of what is quasifinite in our choices and
findings.
We at least as
intelligible sentient beings react to questions on these ultimates at least by
self reflection that it changes subjective observation itself if resonating
subjectively- independently of similar quantum theory interpretations. Therein we know of the perils of such inquiry
as to what we as special, or even in the spying on the future or past or range
of what we are individually and collectively of those who assert as necessary
their wills and election, in a sense a likely falsehood of true self belief in
their divinity. But the understanding of
nonnecessary reality does not justify such belief.
We are back then to
how to live in this world for all practical purposes as well how to treat or allow us to be treated by social systems and other people who desire to escape
life or expect more than the hope of immortality. The usual answer comes back,
as well the engagement with what we own or owe to the world of what can
actually be changed (in all time directions) or a fact in the complexity of
things beyond reversal. That unlike the
child who relishes the same story repeated and in rituals of our cycles of day,
expectation of stages of changes of our lives, we can only cherish and move
with the changes of the story of the moment... all such pictures enjoyed
existentially and nothing thought to remain permanent long, neither love nor
sorrow nor money nor our worlds far from hidden vulnerabilities. "The Universe does not Necessarily exist
would be a deeper statement of our intellectual ideas of ultimate
issues." If you can grasp
the reality of the metaphorical sense of this when even it is a paradox of
nonnecessity as the case. Life may be
immortal uniquely and individually after all as far as proof goes.
But does our very ephemeral reality not enhance or being against the vague infinity and scale of
immortality as dust? Can it not raise the sensitivity to the crime of taking a
single human life or what we need to do for our world itself that we have so
much positive potential to waist or neglect what is true against the false periphery of security felt over some scale of time for such tangled crumbling
of things?
I do not like the
illustration I placed for this post for it represents a view in the mirror of
sorts, one of an older me. It is useful
I realize to monitor general health- say as what is good or not in our insane
and lying ideas some give us for diet or other partially understood and falsely
labeled better living thu modifying with what we do know of our earth's
resources. We do not heed the indicators
of species in our environment even if the health of children of ourselves. No gods so to judge us save those that would
try to fill such a space- as if we do in nonnecessity need the hypothesis so
for whatever agenda of living we may declare it is necessary to so invent such
an entity and one that is required for the functioning of the world as we know
it.
With such a core of
the sense of self and live in even more distant ideals and mirrors in depth or
span, there is no price to pay even in the revenge of leaving others to their
own tanglements, load the dice, walk away, let the great globe fall we dared to
lift up on our shoulders. Was it coincidence I survived what in stress would crush the average soul? Was it the intervention from before or later
by some gods? Is it the intercession in the processes of the dynamics of being
and refinement of our sentience in reflection and awakening- perhaps much, much
more if we decide something of meaning remains beyond it all. In the main long learning curves and threshold of mass before explosions and returning of that hopelessly broken
he who gives ups (that is if it is not destiny so taken away) the ghost has not
reached the depth of new physics or philosophy (and have none of the attributes of character or sanity with responsibility for it of those who harm
others in this world that in the end may as well not have existed nor have
anything in the greater scheme of things to give) - that we need if
we can maintain the faith independently short of what would be needed in
Heaven.
What make me post
this- and where does the sense of time go- not a quest for me for fame or
immortality that cannot endure this state of time- yet something endures does
it not, my defects are other than yours, my ugliness or false scarcity are
perhaps comic but not a tragedy you judge or face so it is easier at some
distance to reflect upon so to bear, to forgive perhaps- is that upon more
awakening and awareness, for whatever reason we may be interested and will
without false volunteering that crimes have permission, due process so to be
used against us or to take our properties real and intellectual we at the mercy
of others and ignorance control the license to own, to be- that it is not I
have not enough time, or that time is enough at some existential final
resolution nothing left behind, but that in the process of awakening, in the
joy of freedom itself and care for it in others, I have not lived enough so
awakened. Even if we have in our
struggles to forgive each other such neglect as to how much we could cherish
our living.
Also, I find a link
(let us hope that within ourselves that what is seen could be seen openly by
another- an that this impression is true seen by ourselves and that within
others) on this issue of encoding along the likes I have shown of our extremes
of the Omega hopelessly tangled or absolute empty ideal ends and approaches to
that observed in the world unto what is of its maps and patterns, reality of
being. That in the nonnecessity of the
discrete and the continuous, even the merging into a theory of everything as
the tangible continuous and material physicality, that we have more than a
discrete or continuous idea of an ideal Omega, or the merging of such stances
or reality- we have again met a paradox in the clarity of the nonnecessity with
exceptions scalar or squared upon itself its one or compound eyes, in this
clear hole of paradox we find the Absolutely Nonnecessary Omega to
which it too will challenge your sense of self and being, shore up your inquiry
thus far if you survive it, that is if
you understand.
Again, in discerning
the indiscernible in the measure of the parts of things against some ground or
whole, there are degrees- that is socks without handedness, or shoes with
hands, or something in many mirrored lines and surfaces in between... these defy
for now our pretenses of measures and understanding- but it is ignorance that
is hardest to discover or has already been, and so to bear more than a change
of our understanding of a better truth.
I add that the actual
drawing or printing of these visual computation (and as an aid for dimensional
printing) at least visualizes super projective plane or brane dimensions that
from some stance may be independent from nonnecessary centers of totally
symmetrical patterns (such as a 4D magic square) or other representations
involving the same number of elements- and of course intelligible symmetry
relations for the global or local linear logic where we admit sub-levels of
fractal-like considerations for the general omnic space or plane is part of the
third or quasic physics philosophy.
At the foundations
our directions are classically uncertain so dependent on various shapes,
stereonometry, thus it is a nonnecessity and indeterminate source which may loop
even at a distance as self-sensitive to changes and commitment to necessary
directions from which the source may exist over existence of possibles creative
from some random or absolute equivalent omega ground- and these are not
necessarily sources of amplification or divergent expansion beyond and dimensionless
to scale- but as such states are physically tenuous, so to loops of gesaltic
return as if in a global shift of information that may underlay as in the
various mutations (and immutation of code reading symmetry directions) that
permit as well intrinsic remission (as in the general exceptions to organic
coherence we vaguely explore as "cancer".
While in the general
symmetry of things we have the core abstract motion descriptions that suggest
directions of evolution between the reed and the lily pad, line and disc, that
between these have clearly two eyes in dynamic (not superfluous redundancy (
quasifinite clocks right if still in certainty cycles of the hours ) as our
strange but general mechanism of bilateral (or any binary) symmetry which
itself may seem as a focus or unity of symmetry in evolving space and
life forms.
Mathematics needs not
be sterile or infertile in its ideals and descriptions, nor the limits of
imagination and wisdom that found in the themes and concerns of our time and
our wildest dreams. Is it too soon or
too much to hope that when we do reach a wider wisdom beyond the scope of these
things and feel grounded in it that the sercurity and peace we find in the
world will not require constraints on knowing from outside our right doing by our
true creative character and depth of cherishing this gift of life and others.
The hope we know or
wish yet feel can be more certain than the despair after a fact beyond
redemption is still a steep learning curve to reach simplicity, and in the
search for fresh new and creative original and fundamental paths or some return
from a lie of following as cyclops some myth of morals as a maze or a labriynth
of being lost in time and chance circumstance the old problems fade as new
problems if we find the complexity has new ones to deal with when they punch us
in the eyes. Along the way there are
stumbles, as well the mystery and joy we find in surprise.
In the actual journey
of learning, no matter what the ends or beginning that integrates its reality
thru time or as past, like Merlin of old we can go back thru time against the
flow of that in the world- to grow old and wise in a sense is to grow young
again.. but the old man weeps and smiles, while the young child starts born old
with some much a cup of wisdom.
Why does this still
not seem enough, that over-world and view of science and philosophy- is
everlasting wisdom an attractor to our nonnecessary souls? Why then do I still long for her flesh
experienced, gagging perhaps at the stray long strand as our mother one combs
her hair... ? It would almost be enough to go thru love again, find the right
other one, cherish her better, and this time to get it right, even blind. We do
not know yet how to love this way even from the possible mysterious wisdom from
the design of the world we most improbably inherent at our birth.
* * * * * * *
No comments:
Post a Comment