**Transitive Turing Brane Mediator Reaction for Particle Physics Data Grounding**

**Sunday, 03 February, 2013**

*L. Edgar Otto*
* Just as we need a
difference that a change of position requires Newton's third (and original) law
as a balance of action and reaction, the oscillation in a field as wave
harmonics, the factorial excesses beyond balanced symmetry of Qbrane and vector
plane systems, its ultimate impractical computability of primes thereby, we
need reflective duality of excess as if a mediator particle given cohesion by
the exchange of quasi-bits between symmetric Quasic dimensions. To add 1 by Church-Turing logic is to define
arithmetical Translation foundationally, to justify some interpretation of
cause globally as asymmetrical in action within a system of such brane design
dimensions.

* As observed or
imagined, in the condensing (flangelation) of such duality decay, a mediator
may escape or be adsorbed as if itself an independent particle for differences
of brain grain and unified level scales.

* Between Yuri and
Pitkanen insights h has a unique and only physical constant as hyper language
metaphor or as such equivalently is a multiplicity a states in same
descriptions.

* A range or class of
structures we style as a particle, such as a proton or photon-packet, may in
multi-flagelation, condensing manifolds (connectivity singularities virtual or
hidden dark exchanges a conceptual or as higher mirror of Being, existing,
becoming...) thus a shell description of
its boson-Fermi radii clouds and information excess (emissions or evaporation's,
monopole momenta effects as virtual shell surface inward or outward
orientations) in itself self duality superposition of its several Tbrane
(expressed as an attractor or indistinguishable motion-rest spin within ideal
virial, Weyl, and metabolic 4th power inverse distance force laws) a quasic
generational condition of severely discrete views of its higher classical radii.

* In particular
certain factorial primes may describe higher resonances of philosophic and even
dark particles (For example Higgs or some invisible, clear transparent and not
directly observable such as gluons as mediators) are really one materialization of discrete
(quasized) energy states at ideal absolute rest in its own self duality (and
this in Pitkanen's insight applying p-adic prime or Mersenne sifting, on discrete count of the absolute rest state
of a wildcard (* = 1 v 0), or 5 or ten Yuri tetrahedral minimum quasication of
structural brane space- taken as substantial or physical beyond that dawning of
information so taken in our day unto the Celestic spin-twist branes as a
foundation for and the substance of physics.

* In vertical arrays
can there be (as if the stance to brane or plane nonlinear, chaotic, or
non-algorithmic ordering) do they regardless of even or oddness of formulas
applied and the fulcrum of reaction to real or virtual grounds, as sets of primes
have special unique relations and properties standing out or between other
columns in quasic dimensional parallels- especially as Tbrane methods of
phenomena of higher computational representations of subtraction,
multiplication or square systems logically, and division which is itself
hierarchical over digits of a number in its shifts so naturally applied with
higher modular quadratic reciprocity residue excess patterns- or between
diverse or multiple brane systems the same type superpositions (especially
projective and complex manifold planes).

If so, each column
may express universe sub-brane quasic computation over the designation of the
same data base and resolving action in ordering of attractors beyond growing
chaos as well as Rene Thom's catastrophe discrete and discontinuous flips over
the embedded round into the flatland manifolds Riemann enumerated, that the
ensemble of concepts so addresses the structural answer to where and what is
the information and where in a sense, physically does it go?

* The Newtonian,
Liebnizean, and Hilbert-Russel Principia formal views meet together as one general phaneron in relation to the idea of mass (and defined general inertia)
in that it is justified within a total theory to express or act with concepts
even undecidable with heuristic dawning judgements while the learning or
designing, things known in relief such as the idea of centripetal forces
(Liebinz) or force added to evoke or impart velocity to an object (Aristotle)
are intelligible views- these forces as well those which describe (via still
ill defined gravity and its various phaneron interpretations so defining mass
or charge- this as real or virtual computability excesses or residues so to
specify quasi-deterministically tides) in a unified or the same description as does Newton and the
effects of the moon.

But is the universe
itself informational as if the ultimate universal Turing machine where digital
or analog our lesser ideas of phase and configuration space as they seem to
expand, be stable and unstable depending on more than the power of our quantum
descriptions, the vertigo of our sense of the world and self as this generation
benefits from the technology of the informational view and takes stances
rebelling thru time against the old ways as surely as the last generation
benefited from the age of Maxwell aesthetic symmetry and experiments- more rapidly it seems will information as a
focus be replaced and I come to the usual pointing the way to more complexity
where an author may say- we may sense the when, but admit we do not quite know
what this age of computers will be replaced by.

In all this the
intelligibility of creative design, the hinted at deeper order of consciousness
as well as its encounter or products of science and philosophy as awakening
disciplines, seems to endure itself as a
last concept of all our laws of conservation not fallen, even if its symmetry
groundings ongoing, so at best we can say is a quasi-law in our being and
inquiry.

* * * * * * *

## No comments:

## Post a Comment