**Invariants and Quasic Crossed Braids**

(An Interpretation of
Another Kea Insight)

*L. Edgar Otto*24 October, 2012

I assume the method
of Kea is an original insight on her part and is a statement at the frontier of
such mechanisms that I imagine works on the frontier of such combination
algebraic spaces.

The looping and knot
like description of the dual 14 sequences, but one of a whole new
generalization possible, as I described in the last post with the Arabic
alphabet as an example involving the sun and moon distinction of combinations
and pronunciation of the letters, a sort of parallel quasi meaning or nuance
of patterns of words, suggests a quasi or multiple invariance at the primes not
unique in the complex factoring.

Again, at the
frontier the braids crossover in their abstract functioning assuming we can
cross the frontier. This is a property
of number itself. I found in Singh that
it was Kummer who raised this objection for the Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem
of the time, the issue beyond current mathematics.

Each dimension, as a
grounding, as an invariant that involves also the logic of knot invariants, as
if the idea of an associahedron is unique to a certain dimension does seem to
be open to a wider generalization of normal group operations in a quasi closed
manner by which we need further depth across the main quasic diagonal in which
we make further distinctions between the simple idea of even and odd numbers-
this alone would question some of the foundations of proofs and show the
intuitionist soundness in a quasifinite concept where it applies as in Ernst
Kummer's and Leopold Kronecker's (dare I suggest Einstein's partial return to
Newton's corpuscular idea in photon wave packets?) insights.

Kea, (Marni D. Sheppeard)
also considered various ideas she understood as useful of others as to what was
a little more different on one or the other side of a normal matrix (as applied
to the logic of particle physics and the role of asymmetry). I also saw her use of the general depth of
the quasic field as something she considered in these crossover cases she
suggested applied to particles as if sub-quasic and thus generational regions as
if normal matrices withing matrices.

But I do not speak
for other living theoreticians as I cannot claim the training. Still, hers was an effort and language of
which I felt at home and it natural and simple to understand as is usual in
other areas when the attainment of understanding as the days anomalies
vanishing gives us the usual feeling of a jump between the mystery and that no
longer interesting save in the detail finer significant figure engineering of
new physics. She noted a child could
understand the physics which of course the aim is to make simple principles of
the diverse complexity in the world- but this is a frontier for all of us who
can be overwhelmed by the thoughts and sensations in that space between
childlike confusion and concrete genius.

As a learning and
research metaphor model we certainly may imagine the universe itself moves in
such evolving directions that in a sense it learns. This still in the spirit of things the
spacious shell of ground and cycles that the world as at least quasi unique at
the foundations is in a sense a oneness of consistency (a quasi invariance) in
the context we all are potentially capable to understand.

* * * * * *

The illustration is a suggestion of a dynamic splicing of patterns in the realm where we apply such combinatorial ideas outside the usual span of the physics. As of this morning, and let us count the sharpness of the stacking of siccors, I understood the application to real and virtual codes in this wider span as well the technological implications beyond that frontier we now explore such as 3D printing in a context. In that these ideas are also ideas of information I begin to see there is no minimum well, pixel as such and there is more beneath minimum quantization than the base ball curve figure's seem to state that appears so in our common sense. More on these notes of this morning later...

## No comments:

## Post a Comment